bare_pussy
licking envelopes
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2003
- Posts
- 1,646
10 items or less!
Why the Libertarians can't get shit done
- Thread starter ubertroll
- Start date
richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
Who wouldn't want the cantina band playing the national anthem???
Ham Murabi
Plumbing the Depths
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2002
- Posts
- 23,159
Why the Libertarians can't get shit done
Because it's the liberals who specialize in shit.
Because it's the liberals who specialize in shit.
ubertroll
So always to tyrants.
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2003
- Posts
- 11,822
Actually, no. In most industrialized nations the birthrate is SUBSTANTIALLY below the death rate. Israel and the US are the only two where it's not.
This is where you start to go off the factborne kilter. Then you decide to take three swings of Crazy Ale and claim that, apparently, the military-industrial complex is using mind control to supress the birth rate so that we have to allow low-wage immigrants in or face national collapse.
You're fuckin' nuts.
The funny thing about sarcastic insults about ignorance is that they tend to work best when you're making factually accurate statements.
Good insight. It will be interesting to see how long you keep debating him.
TurdFergeson
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Posts
- 36,286
"The number of live births increased in 1998 to 3,944,046, a 2 percent increase over the previous year. The US population grew by 1,605,976, exclusive of immigration. There were an estimated 2,338,070 deaths in the US in 1998."
This totally backs up my statement that the birth rate .vs. death rate in the USA is nearly the same, like I said.
The USA only added 1.6 million people to the population in 1998. It's quite obvious the vast majority of population growth stems from immigration.
I never once mentioned any "complex". I said society in general tends to condition people and women into having less children.
You call mothers "baby factories". Nice term for the woman who gave birth to the likes of you. You prove my thesis with your disparaging remarks about mothers, and act like women who choose to have kids are somehow less than women who choose careers and less or no kids.
The fact remains that the vast majority of immigrants come here from Nations with lower standards of living. Children born into a higher standard of living enviroment will obviously demand that same standard , if not higher. Not the case wih immigrants, for the most part.
You're brainwashed.
Last edited:
TurdFergeson
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Posts
- 36,286
I've figured out uberdork. He's a femi-nazi!
lol
lol
TurdFergeson
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Posts
- 36,286
Immigration and Population Growth
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7d78
"Although the foreign-born are about one in every nine U.S. residents, they account for a much larger share of U.S. births. Native-born Americans average roughly 13 births per thousand people; immigrants average roughly 28 births per thousand. As a result, the foreign-born have a disproportionate share of the births in the U.S. According to the Census Bureau, in 2000, births to foreign-born mothers accounted for 17 percent of the births in the United States.2
Because of this difference in fertility rates and the addition of a large number of new immigrants every year, immigration is responsible for a greatly disproportionate amount of U.S. population growth. Although immigrants were under ten percent of the U.S. population in the 1990s, they were responsible for 54 percent of the population growth (counting births to immigrants as immigrant births rather than as native births).3
Immigration is the driving force behind U.S. population growth. It now adds more than one million people—the equivalent of two Denvers—to our population every year."
Now, the only remaining question is why? Why condition Americans to have less offspring and encourage much more immigration? Has to be economics.
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7d78
"Although the foreign-born are about one in every nine U.S. residents, they account for a much larger share of U.S. births. Native-born Americans average roughly 13 births per thousand people; immigrants average roughly 28 births per thousand. As a result, the foreign-born have a disproportionate share of the births in the U.S. According to the Census Bureau, in 2000, births to foreign-born mothers accounted for 17 percent of the births in the United States.2
Because of this difference in fertility rates and the addition of a large number of new immigrants every year, immigration is responsible for a greatly disproportionate amount of U.S. population growth. Although immigrants were under ten percent of the U.S. population in the 1990s, they were responsible for 54 percent of the population growth (counting births to immigrants as immigrant births rather than as native births).3
Immigration is the driving force behind U.S. population growth. It now adds more than one million people—the equivalent of two Denvers—to our population every year."
Now, the only remaining question is why? Why condition Americans to have less offspring and encourage much more immigration? Has to be economics.
