Why is being trans supposedly a mental disorder, but believing in crackpot conspiracies - like a stolen election in 2020 - not?

Because reasons.

Hey, it's better than their excuses.
 
because both premises are believed by THE SAME PEOPLE whose brains aren't functioning at a normal human level, whether currently or permanently. there is no discussions to be had with them; they demand to be heard but refuse to ever listen.
 
Front page CNN website has a woman that has served her time due to pleading guilty to the Jan 6th insurrection explain that she was brainwashed by a cult. Unfortunately...this is fact

Also fact: it usually takes a real moron to have been brainwashed by that shit.

If you read through comments made by the defendants, there's not enough brainpower collectively there to light a single bulb.
 
This thread is already triggering nicely!

That's what happens to Deplorables when you call out their hypocrisy - they can handle some things, but they can't handle that. šŸ˜˜
 
This thread is already triggering nicely!

That's what happens to Deplorables when you call out their hypocrisy - they can handle some things, but they can't handle that. šŸ˜˜
so tell me degenerate

why WAS it a mental disorder and no longer?

WHAT CHANGED?
 
Trying not to go too deep on this rabbit hole, but here's a reasonable, logical explanation...
There is no "trans" gene. Only feelings. Feelings don't make facts. Facts make facts. (Remember the cries to 'follow the science'?)

On the other hand, there has been ample evidence given to at least give the theory of a stolen election serious consideration. The only reason it's treated as 'conspiracy theory' is that the leftists and globalists in the media and in Washington have deemed it so. Fun fact: Not one court, not one that turned down the case for election fraud, did so on the merits of the evidence. Didn't even look at the evidence. Every court turned it down based on flimsy legality technicalities.

At any rate, one situation, no actual evidence beyond, 'but I feel this way'. The other actually presents hard evidence, whether you like or agree with the evidence or not. There's your reason. Have a great day. šŸ˜
 
there has been ample evidence given to at least give the theory of a stolen election serious consideration. The only reason it's treated as 'conspiracy theory' is that the leftists and globalists in the media and in Washington have deemed it so. Fun fact: Not one court, not one that turned down the case for election fraud, did so on the merits of the evidence. Didn't even look at the evidence. Every court turned it down based on flimsy legality technicalities.

^^^
If you or someone you know is experiencing mental health issues similar to above, there are resources available. You don't have to face them alone.

Consult a physician or mental health professional; see this site for resources: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/find-help

Also, a hotline is available: (800) 662-4357

ā¤
 
^^^
If you or someone you know is experiencing mental health issues similar to above, there are resources available. You don't have to face them alone.

Consult a physician or mental health professional; see this site for resources: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/find-help

Also, a hotline is available: (800) 662-4357

ā¤
You realize, just calling a belief based on evidence and observed objective facts a mental disorder, that does not make it so.

The frightening thing is that there are voices on your side actually calling for "reeducation camps" (remember Communism and Nazi Socialism?) for conservatives, and actually saying their children need taken away from them. Y'all are a scary, dangerous bunch.

https://wcti12.com/news/nation-worl...shing-for-re-education-camps-for-trump-voters
 
The frightening thing is that there are voices on your side actually calling for "reeducation camps"

Article says this particular individual was fired after making those remarks, and he was fired by "voices on [my] side" who didn't agree with him. ("his actions 'in no way reflect our values or opinions.'")

Oops. Play again? šŸ˜˜
 
Article says this particular individual was fired after making those remarks, and he was fired by "voices on [my] side" who didn't agree with him.

Oops. Play again? šŸ˜˜
Yet it was said out loud, and if you dig deeper, he was not alone in what he was saying. He was (and is) among many, even if they aren't a majority, on your side....

And I suspect (I have no proof, so it isn't fact, just a theory based on observation of past behavior on your side) that he was fired, not for holding that position, but because he actually said it out loud and exposed that faction of the left to the light of truth.
 
Trying not to go too deep on this rabbit hole, but here's a reasonable, logical explanation...
There is no "trans" gene. Only feelings. Feelings don't make facts. Facts make facts. (Remember the cries to 'follow the science'?)

There is no "gay" gene either, yet homosexuality also was once classified as a mental disorder but is not anymore.

Mental disorders don't have to have a genetic marker or cause.

Transgenderism is no longer considered a mental disorder because the organizations and experts who deal with mental disorders have determined it is not a mental disorder. That is the fact. You are free to disagree with their decision, but that is only your feeling and doesn't make it a fact.
 
(I have no proof, so it isn't fact, just a theory based on observation of past behavior on your side)

Your observation skills have also resulted in this: "there has been ample evidence given to at least give the theory of a stolen election serious consideration".

So, objectively, they're worthless.

Thanks for playing! šŸ˜Ž
 
Your observation skills have also resulted in this: "there has been ample evidence given to at least give the theory of a stolen election serious consideration".

So, objectively, they're worthless.

Thanks for playing! šŸ˜Ž
ā€¢
That ^ was like watching a cat slap around a dead mouse just for fun.

šŸ‘

šŸ¤£
 
so tell me degenerate

why WAS it a mental disorder and no longer?

WHAT CHANGED?
Perhaps research and science?

Back in the day homosexuality was considered a mental disorder. Then they did research that determined it wasnā€™t and it was removed from the DSM.
 
because both premises are believed by THE SAME PEOPLE whose brains aren't functioning at a normal human level, whether currently or permanently. there is no discussions to be had with them; they demand to be heard but refuse to ever listen.
ā€¢
Basically:

ā€œJust consider the Deplorable sourceā€.

*nods*
 
Your observation skills have also resulted in this: "there has been ample evidence given to at least give the theory of a stolen election serious consideration".

So, objectively, they're worthless.

Thanks for playing! šŸ˜Ž
Again, writing off objective facts you don't like doesn't make them go away.
 
Again, writing off objective facts you don't like doesn't make them go away.

What "objective facts"?

Keep going. We're enjoying the freakshow, and it's bumping my thread.

Either that, or you're lying - those "facts" don't exist - and you'll scurry away from this thread after making some lame excuse/retort.

Your move.šŸæ
 
Again, writing off objective facts you don't like doesn't make them go away.
Interesting. Especially as you're pulling "facts" out of your ass.

Please tell us about your extensive knowledge about genetics which allows you to boldly claim "facts" not in evidence regarding transgenderism.
 
Back
Top