Why Idiots are dickless, right-wing neo-fascists.

[keeblercrumb]

Attribution:
It is only fair that I credit Amicus’ recent witty and erudite thread “Why intellectuals are left-wing wimps” as the inspiration for this thread. Think of it as a “spin-off” for those who think at all. –KC

Why idiots are dickless right-wing neo-fascists. Why indeed! Genetics? Environmental factors? There are a host of issues to be examined in what is one of today’s burning questions…

Consider the following facts:

90% of the KKK (Klu Klux Klan) vote Republican, the other 10% are unable to operate the levers of the voting machines due to severe hand burns.

90% of the NANP (New American Nazi Party) in fact, vote Republican despite party instructions to vote for Adolph.

90% of the AAI (Association of American Idiots) follow their association recommendations and vote Republican. Well, technically it is 100%, as 10% of the association (known as the “Truth in Advertising” wing) insists on “writing in” Dick Cheney.

And perhaps most telling of all…

90% of UEA (United Eunuchs of America) vote Republican. The other 10% continue to write in Richard “The “Dick” Nixon because his name gets them excited.

I was tempted to set this Nature vs. Nurture thing as a poll, but it would seem only fair to let Idiots vote as well but all those big numbers would just confuse them so I have elected to dispense with the poll concept.

Genetics:
The arguments in favor of “genetics” to explain why Idiots are dickless, right-wing neo-fascists, mostly centers on the fact that they frequently share the same physical attributes: pale white skin; thin, sneering lips, and beady little eyes which are commonly hidden behind oversized sunglasses. These attributes (commonly referred as “Honky Syndrome”) frequently span generations of idiots such as evidenced by the rise of vicious, fascist governments over the last century. Others, however, insist that these attributes are simply a product of in-breeding and the mother-fucking behaviors common among the group. On the other hand, others have observed that a very small, but noisy, sub-group of Idiots consists of women, for whom the lack of a dick such as evident in the male members(sic) of this group is, of course, perfectly normal.

Other counter this argument pointing out that these attributes may merely be the result of in uterine defects triggered by a dogged refusal to believe that they are living in areas of uncontrolled toxic pollution, citing the need to protect personal property while pouting in the corner. What do you think?

Environmental Factors:
In addition to the “refusal to acknowledge pollution” impacts noted, there are many experts in the field of idiocy who believe it may be related to arrested development in childhood. One example of this is frequently associated with becoming bewildered and dysfunctional while reading the Classic Comic Book version of “The Fountainhead”. This arrested development has been cited in the seeming inability of many idiots to move beyond a third grade public education or the completion of their Doctorate from the “Amicus University” home study “Learn to think Good” program.

Whichever side of this urgent debate you find yourself on, please remember…. Idiots are people too and deserve your love and consideration. Life on this planet would be far duller was it not for the hours of silly and witless entertainment these dick-less, right-wing, neo-fascist idiots provide us.

Reporting from the Commune Campfire:

-KC

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

KEEBLERELF

You dont understand Fascists very well. Nor do you understand KKK or Republicans. What you do is toss sharks and whales and guppies into the same tank and call them 'fish.'

I'm a fascist. I think the average Republican is a pussy and KKK are clods.

Fascists believe democracy is little better than handing the keys to the bank over to the bandits and expecting them to share. Fascists dont like you taking your shit out on the street. Whatever your vice or insanity is, keep it out of sight. But there are limits. You cant fuck little boys. We'll shoot you if you do. We'll shoot you if you embezzle your employee's pension fund. We'll shoot you if you murder your wife or mother-in-law. We only do black & white, not gray. We dont care if they were bitches. If you spray grafitti on stuff we'll beat you. If you drive drunk we'll beat you. Think of us like the wise-guys and the Mafia.

 

[Rumple Foreskin]

Now lay off us idiots. We got our pride, you know?

Rumple "remedial" Foreskin

 

[rgraham666]

Personally I refer to the neo-conservatives as neo-Marxists.

They pretty much agree with Marx on how a capitalist economy works. They just think this is a good thing rather than a bad thing.

They're expert propagandists, with a specialized language designed to shape the argument in their favour. And like the Marxists they have trouble comprehending any participation that doesn't use that language.

They, like the Marxists, live in a pretty much hermetically sealed intellectual environment unconnected with the world people actually live in.

And like the Marxists there's little they wouldn't do to make sure the perfect world they envision comes to pass.

As always the differences between ideologues are simply aesthetic, rather like differentiating between a copperhead and rattlesnake. The common point is that they're both venomous snakes and if you're bitten by either, you're fucked.

 

[keeblercrumb]

KEEBLERELF

You dont understand Fascists very well. Nor do you understand KKK or Republicans. What you do is toss sharks and whales and guppies into the same tank and call them 'fish.'

I'm a fascist. I think the average Republican is a pussy and KKK are clods.

Fascists believe democracy is little better than handing the keys to the bank over to the bandits and expecting them to share. Fascists dont like you taking your shit out on the street. Whatever your vice or insanity is, keep it out of sight. But there are limits. You cant fuck little boys. We'll shoot you if you do. We'll shoot you if you embezzle your employee's pension fund. We'll shoot you if you murder your wife or mother-in-law. We only do black & white, not gray. We dont care if they were bitches. If you spray grafitti on stuff we'll beat you. If you drive drunk we'll beat you. Think of us like the wise-guys and the Mafia.

But I did mention that only 90% of the dickless, right-wing, neo-fascist idiots voted Republican! You are obviously one of the other 10%.

Thanks for the input JBJ.

-KC

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Neo-Cons are whores.

 

[egelante]

Personally I refer to the neo-conservatives as neo-Marxists.

They pretty much agree with Marx on how a capitalist economy works. They just think this is a good thing rather than a bad thing.

They're expert propagandists, with a specialized language designed to shape the argument in their favour. And like the Marxists they have trouble comprehending any participation that doesn't use that language.

They, like the Marxists, live in a pretty much hermetically sealed intellectual environment unconnected with the world people actually live in.

And like the Marxists there's little they wouldn't do to make sure the perfect world they envision comes to pass.

As always the differences between ideologues are simply aesthetic, rather like differentiating between a copperhead and rattlesnake. The common point is that they're both venomous snakes and if you're bitten by either, you're fucked.

This post made me very happy.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

KEEBLERELF

I have a problem voting for candidates who intend to sodomize me, and both parties intend to sodomize me....in the Biblical sense of the word.

 

[neonlyte]

Now lay off us idiots. We got our pride, you know?

Rumple "remedial" Foreskin

Yeah... but you try hard not to flaunt it.

 

[neonlyte]

keebler... can you please refrain from quoting the arsehole, most of us have him on ignore.

 

[keeblercrumb]

keebler... can you please refrain from quoting the arsehole, most of us have him on ignore.

I know, I know. And I will try not to quote him.

It will piss him off even more to read it, but, in truth, I feel for the guy.

Maybe it's a Nam thing but he reeks with "Fuck it, don't mean nothin'" cynicism. I am just sorry that he has this compulsion to spew it out all over the place here.

I fully understand your desire not to deal with him....

-KC

 

[Roxanne Appleby]

I'm always amazed at how some of the most strident ideologues somehow claim that they represent no ideology, yet condemn those who are forthright about representing a particular ideology for their very forthrightness in doing so. This generally applies to individuals whose own views are so meticulously alligned with the status quo, "socially acceptable" climate of opinion of the milieu they inhabit that they're actually unaware of how this is very definitely a very firm ideology. Instead they view it as some sort of content-free vacuum or "natural state." Like fish in water, they don't realize that they are wet.

The condemnation occurs before the actual substance of the dissenting ideas is considered, evidenced by the content of the condemnation: "You are an ideologue!" In this view, an ideologue is defined as anyone who specifies the ways he or she dissents from the predominant, status quo organized collection of ideas shared by the condemner. Thus, the condemnation of "ideologism" essentially means condemning dissent and disagreement as such.

In addition, generally the presumption is that the dissenter's views are not only incorrect, they are illegitimate. It's a sly (and most likley unconscious) form of intolerance which violates the first rule of civility, which is to accord those one disagrees with the presumption that their beliefs are founded in good will, and are therefore legitimate, even if in error.



"Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist." - Keynes

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

KEEBLERELF

You and your Ilk are the mob. Mobs dont think, you guys follow along with your noses pressed against the ass of the fool ahead of you.

Youre the people who elected Lyndon Johnson President in 1964, then marched in the streets against him in 1968. Your only convictions are what's fashionable at the moment.

 

[keeblercrumb]

I'm always amazed at how some of the most strident ideologues somehow claim that they represent no ideology, yet condemn those who are forthright about representing a particular ideology for their very forthrightness in doing so. This generally applies to individuals whose own views are so meticulously alligned with the status quo, "socially acceptable" climate of opinion of the milieu they inhabit that they're actually unaware of how this is very definitely a very firm ideology. Instead they view it as some sort of content-free vacuum or "natural state." Like fish in water, they don't realize that they are wet.

The condemnation occurs before the actual substance of the dissenting ideas is considered, evidenced by the content of the condemnation: "You are an ideologue!" In this view, an ideologue is defined as anyone who specifies the ways he or she dissents from the predominant, status quo organized collection of ideas shared by the condemner. Thus, the condemnation of "ideologism" essentially means condemning dissent and disagreement as such.

In addition, generally the presumption is that the dissenter's views are not only incorrect, they are illegitimate. It's a sly (and most likley unconscious) form of intolerance which violates the first rule of civility, which is to accord those one disagrees with the presumption that their beliefs are founded in good will, and are therefore legitimate, even if in error.



"Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist." - Keynes

Could not agree with you more.

Well said.

-KC