LadyVer
Definitely not a mouse
- Joined
- May 26, 2012
- Posts
- 19,013
Wow, what? SHow me the ethical issue in using any publically available text as a learning exercise and discussion topic.
You might have had a case if I'd named the story and author and proceeded to humiliate them over a lack of basic writing skill; though even that would be fair game in marketplace of ideas we call writing (though it's poor form in my opinion.) But I deliberately chose a highly rated story I didn't name (though someone else proved it was possible to track it down in Google), and I deliberately avoided claiming it was poor writing.
I'm still trying to see a single ethical or moral issue with "Here's some text I found in a public place and how I'd have done it differently; how would you have done it differently?" Seriously, I'm stunned. Are you arguing people have some sort of right to have their publically shared work held above anything that might possibly smack of criticism or even discussion? How would such a right even work?
The culture of entitlement is out of control.
Chuckling mischievously and cooing will not birth a culture of entitlement. You've gotten good feedback to your post by authors who usually find it difficult to agree on much. To me, integrity comes to mind, not entitlement.