Why Barack Obama Should Resign.

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
WHY BARACK OBAMA SHOULD RESIGN. Just for the record, this is what it looked like for a man who made a film that made the Obama Administration uncomfortable:


6a00d8341c630a53ef017d3c0e6f14970c-640wi




Here’s the key bit:“Just after midnight Saturday morning, authorities descended on the Cerritos home of the man believed to be the filmmaker behind the anti-Muslim movie that has sparked protests and rioting in the Muslim world.”

When taking office, the President does not swear to create jobs. He does not swear to “grow the economy.” He does not swear to institute “fairness.” The only oath the President takes is this one:



I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

By sending — literally — brownshirted enforcers to engage in — literally — a midnight knock at the door of a man for the non-crime of embarrassing the President of the United States and his administration, President Obama violated that oath. You can try to pretty this up (It’s just about possible probation violations! Sure.), or make excuses or draw distinctions, but that’s what’s happened. It is a betrayal of his duties as President, and a disgrace.

He won’t resign, of course. First, the President has the appreciation of free speech that one would expect from a Chicago Machine politician, which is to say, none. Second, he’s not getting any pressure. Indeed, the very press that went crazy over Ari Fleischer’s misrepresented remarks seems far less interested in the actions of an administration that I repeat, literally sent brown-shirted enforcers to launch a midnight knock on a filmmaker’s door.

But Obama’s behavior — and that of his enablers in the press — has laid down a marker for those who are paying attention. By these actions he is, I repeat, unfit to hold office. I hope and expect that the voters will agree in November.
 
Remember, this guy was not investigated on suspicion of a crime. He was investigated on suspicion of a lawful, but unpopular, act of speech.
 
If you remember, when Joe the Plumber embarrassed Obama a helpful bureaucrat in Ohio began checking up on his licensing and liens.
 
He's being investigated for parole violation, dummy.

Remember, this guy was not investigated on suspicion of a crime. He was investigated on suspicion of a lawful, but unpopular, act of speech.
You are so sure that you know the facts of the matter.

The guy in the picture has been questioned and released. He is now in hiding, and authorities don't know where he is. That doesn't fit your scenarios.
 
You are so sure that you know the facts of the matter.

The guy in the picture has been questioned and released. He is now in hiding, and authorities don't know where he is. That doesn't fit your scenarios.

Sure a lot of cops in that picture for something so routine, do you think?
 
Funny, but sitting presidents about to win re-election don't think about resignation.
 
Of course teh FACT he is an Egyptian Christian Copt....who BTW, are being exterminated in Egypt is NOT MENTIONED


ED MORRISSEY: Media endangers entire neighborhood to pursue thoughtcrime suspect.



Take a look at just the first minute or so of this report. Look at all of the media trucks in this sleepy little neighborhood, and not just KTLA’s. If anyone interested in taking revenge on Nakoula Besseley Nakoula wanted to know where to find him, it wouldn’t take long in this small city, especially with some media reports noting Nakoula’s distinctive front door. And while some people wouldn’t care about Nakoula’s fate, the kind of people looking to take revenge on him aren’t really known for their precision attacks and avoidance of collateral damage. This media swarm puts that entire neighborhood at risk, now and probably for a very long time.

And for what? Is Nakoula a serial killer? A child molester? No, he’s a man with poor taste who made a video that insulted some people who can’t deal with criticism, even the laughably inane and inept criticism of this 14-minute cheesefest that makes Plan 9 From Outer Space look like Citizen Kane. However, in the US, making really bad movies and engaging in even inept theological and historical commentary isn’t a crime at all. The media are undermining the same guarantees of free speech that allow them to operate without government interference, and they’re putting people’s lives at risk while doing so. They’re not going to be happy until there’s another crater in Cerritos.

Meanwhile, while the media provides moment-to-moment coverage of Thoughtcrime Enemy #1 this week, the feds are interrogating him as to whether his filmmaking might violate his probation on unrelated matters. . . . Here’s the question: would any of these people care about Nakoula’s probation status had the video not purportedly caused riots? If so, isn’t this pursuit more about the kind of speech in which Nakoula engaged than in what kind of activity he may have conducted with computers and the Internet? This is dangerous ground for free speech, and the media is making Cerritos into dangerous ground in a much more literal sense.

The media used to call themselves preventers of tyranny. They seem more like enablers, these days.
 
Will the Obama Brownshirts go after the maker of this cartoon?

AFTER ALL, IT IS OFFENSIVE

IS IT NOT?

635.jpg
 
If Kathryn Bigelow’s Movie About the Killing of Bin Laden Inflames Muslims Will the Brownshirts Be Sent to Her Home?


September 15, 2012
By Lonely Conservative


Kathryn Bigelow

John Nolte thinks the White House should insist that the movie “Zero Dark Thirty” be shelved because it could inflame the Muslim world.


Now that the White House and State Department have made clear that they believe movies compel terrorists to terrorize, it’s time for them to get ahead of this problem. And one thing the White House can do immediately is to pressure Sony to stop the release of director Kathryn Bigelow’s “Zero Dark Thirty,” which celebrates the killing of Osama bin Laden.

I’m only saying this because, you know, the White House and the media told me movies inflame and cause terrorism. …

Moreover, an excuse Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will not be able to use in the case of “Zero Dark Thirty” (as she did with “Innocence of Muslims”) is the cowardly and self-righteous claim that the federal government and the Obama White House had nothing to do with “Zero Dark Thirty.”

Because the federal government and the Obama White House had everything to do with “Zero Dark Thirty.”

As we now know, in an effort to get this glitzy in-kind contribution (tens of millions of dollars) up on the screen in time to affect the election, it was the Obama Administration that gave the filmmakers tons of encouragement and a troubling amount of access to all kinds of classified material. (Read More)

We all know that nobody will ask Bigelow not to release her movie, as it was made with the intention of making President Obama look good. He needs all the propaganda he can get. I just wonder if this movie does insult Muslims and sends them out rampaging in the streets if the authorities will send brownshirts to Bigelow’s home in the middle of the night like they did to the guy who made that obscure film they’re blaming everything on now. They probably won’t, you know, because in the Obama world some people are more equal and deserving of rights than others.
 
If you remember, when Joe the Plumber embarrassed Obama a helpful bureaucrat in Ohio began checking up on his licensing and liens.

First of all, whether he "embarrassed Obama" is strictly a matter of opinion. (His status as a plumber was NOT a matter of opinion: he wasn't one, and as far as I know he still isn't). Secondly, the matter of whether his claims against Obama (that Obama's tax policies would jeopardize his business) were true made it perfectly relevant to look into his certification and his business status to determine the accuracy of his claims. Not only perfectly legal, but that move also proved his claims were nonsense.
 
First of all, whether he "embarrassed Obama" is strictly a matter of opinion. (His status as a plumber was NOT a matter of opinion: he wasn't one, and as far as I know he still isn't). Secondly, the matter of whether his claims against Obama (that Obama's tax policies would jeopardize his business) were true made it perfectly relevant to look into his certification and his business status to determine the accuracy of his claims. Not only perfectly legal, but that move also proved his claims were nonsense.

Judging your post, I dont believe you will understand what I will write

Everything you said above goes against everything the US stood for.........

I said sood, not stands


And

Everything Joe the p said was iindeed true..........by now even those with one eye see it
 
Back
Top