LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
I am saying that this is about workplace hazards. Crazy clients are a common workplace hazard for prostitutes, while heat stroke is a common hazard for, say, farm workers.dead is dead... but you started comparing it to work place injury... like someone dropped a heavy box on their foot
Nope. I'm saying that you run very low odds of driving home drunk safely. Better odds, of course, than any male will ever have finding a gay for pay client, much less a woman client.and drunk driving is also illegal... unless of course you think drunk driving is perfectly safe because the vast majority of them don't kill people
Exactly. And if all poor men went gay for pay there'd be an even bigger number of men starving.and I can still point out the thousands of drunk drivers that DO kill people
No one knows? Really?! You don't say!!!!!!!!!so incarcertion rates and arrest rates are completely innaccurate.. we could then claim that there arent as many female sex trade workers despite the all the adverts.. because that would only reflect a superficial euyeball
and hell, most sex trade isnt even on the street..... so who knows exactly how many men and women truly are....
But your argument falls apart on the fact that women who pay for sex are EXTREMELY rare.and I'm not side stepping I already said that there ARE women that pay for sex.. i even linked it in a post...don't blame me if you didnt bother to read it
No, I meant that men can choose to go to prison by robbing someone or other things that Xenophile jokingly suggested.when you said men can just opt to go to prison, then women would have to pay tax to feed them
that suggests women dont go to jail for prostitution.. for feeding themselves through the sex trade.. feeding their families through prostitution
No.or is this some amicus arguement that only men are allowed to be primary bread earners?
Your arguments are big enough targets that I normally don't bother to waste time on your grammar.I make mistakes all the time.. and people point them out all the time..sometimes mocking me to great lengths about my grammar
Actually I'm trying to explain to you the irony of you throwing rocks from your glass house. But instead you see it as "pissing about it". So you just keep throwing rocks from your glass house!what I dont do is piss about for multiple posts therafter..it would make me seem petulant and childish if I did
BZZZT, I've had him on ignore for ages.and you've only recently started telling Cade off... i can point out times you actively supported him..
A handful of outliers. Even smaller outliers than, say, women who pay for sex...maybe its because I'm one of the few people that actively engages you with full conversations
Have you ever been to Lit? you do realize why people stand up for women on here.. because there multiple threads about how bad women are... look at amicus..or renard ....with you at least you get some salient points across... all they do is spew out random completely falsified rhetoric that they interpret as gospel and fact
Another advantage of being a woman.and this is a porn site.. of course men are sucking up to women.. they're horny... hell, that's probably the primary reason men suck up to women in the first place
The only deconstruction you have ever done is of yourself. The latest, of course, is admitting that no one knows the real rates of prostitution. However, I do stand pat on instinct: women are far more desirable for hetero sex than men. And that is putting it lightly.as for men getting piled on.. please.. you tried that tactic with me before and you still havent bothered replying to my deconstruction