Whistleblower

FROM ANOTHER THREAD...

"When one is involved in a conspiracy to defraud and undermine the US Government and its citizenry... Their claim better be founded more than Quicksand of I hate Trump.

Made of sound bites and wishful thinking in secret meetings and unverified news paper reports does not make a lawful whistle blower and WE the people as well as the target have a right to know who, what, when ...where and why.

And we will.

And then we will vote.:):rolleyes: "
 
I think that is the root cause of their frantic fear...



Democrats feel insecure about the election
since they are offering nothing but impeachment.

Honest Joe won't tell Plumber Joe what he's going to do for him
that The Orange Don isn't doing for him already at 3.5% unemployment...
 
Clearly Hunters pay is questionable, so maybe they were hoping for whatever.

But your biased article lacks the context of international support for Joes actions to get rid of corrupt Shokin.


The whole episode smells to high heaven.

Where were those crack investigative journalists of the NYT and the WaPo while little Hunter was collecting his $3,000,000 (apparently, at a rate of $600,000 per annum) ?

There's little doubt that Menton has his biases but "What's sauce for the goose, is sauce for the gander."

At least Menton is forthright about where he stands— in sharp contrast to the sanctimonious, hypocritical and increasingly error-prone NYT, WaPo and National Propaganda Radio.


 
Tucker Carlson:

“Donald Trump should not have been on the phone with a foreign head of state encouraging another country to investigate his political opponent, Joe Biden,” he said.

“Some Republicans are trying, but there’s no way to spin this as a good idea.”

So now we are at the he did it and it’s bad, but it’s not that bad phase.
 
Tucker Carlson:

“Donald Trump should not have been on the phone with a foreign head of state encouraging another country to investigate his political opponent, Joe Biden,” he said.

“Some Republicans are trying, but there’s no way to spin this as a good idea.”

So now we are at the he did it and it’s bad, but it’s not that bad phase.

it was a great idea

TC is wrong:cool:
 
Tucker Carlson:

“Donald Trump should not have been on the phone with a foreign head of state encouraging another country to investigate his political opponent, Joe Biden,” he said.

“Some Republicans are trying, but there’s no way to spin this as a good idea.”

So now we are at the he did it and it’s bad, but it’s not that bad phase.

https://godfatherpolitics.com/flashb...s-tax-returns/

FLASHBACK – Hillary To China: If You’re Listening Get Trump’s Tax Returns’

NO ONE DOES HYPOCRISY LIKE DEMOCRATS DO HYPOCRISY - FLASHBACK - Hillary To China: If You're Listening Get Trump's Tax Returns'

but THATS different because................SHUT UP!
 
Even the left-leaning Post knows it's a set-up:

Sam Stein: “Have you heard from the whistleblower? Do you want to hear from the whistleblower? What protections could you provide to the whistleblower?” …

Schiff: “We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower. We would like to. But I am sure the whistleblower has concerns that he has not been advised, as the law requires, by the inspector general or the director of national Intelligence just how he is supposed to communicate with Congress, and so the risk to the whistleblower is retaliation.”​

This is flat-out false....

Schiff on “Morning Joe” clearly made a statement that was false. He now says he was answering the wrong question, but if that was the case, he should have quickly corrected the record. He compounded his falsehood by telling reporters a few days later that if not for the IG’s office, the committee would not have known about the complaint. That again suggested there had been no prior communication.

The explanation that Schiff was not sure it was the same whistleblower especially strains credulity.

Schiff earns Four Pinocchios.​

G. Kessler, Schiff’s false claim his committee had not spoken to the whistleblower, Washington Post (Oct. 4, 2019).

Perhaps, what is needed is for someone who has not seen that video clip to overhear someone that has and become a whistleblower to report that they heard that someone has seen a video clip of Crazy Uncle Joe bragging about getting a Ukrainian fired by threatening to withhold US military aid.

FROM ANOTHER THREAD...

"When one is involved in a conspiracy to defraud and undermine the US Government and its citizenry... Their claim better be founded more than Quicksand of I hate Trump.

Made of sound bites and wishful thinking in secret meetings and unverified news paper reports does not make a lawful whistle blower and WE the people as well as the target have a right to know who, what, when ...where and why.

And we will.

And then we will vote.:):rolleyes: "

Have you all not heard news? Now it’s official.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/tr...-comes-forward-trump-ukraine-scandal-n1062961

A second whistleblower has come forward with information about President Donald Trump’s call with the president of Ukraine, according to attorneys representing that whistleblower and the intelligence official whose earlier complaint set off a series of events culminating in an impeachment inquiry.

The second whistleblower "has first-hand knowledge" of the events, according to attorney Mark Zaid.
 
Tucker Carlson:

“Donald Trump should not have been on the phone with a foreign head of state encouraging another country to investigate his political opponent, Joe Biden,” he said.

“Some Republicans are trying, but there’s no way to spin this as a good idea.”

So now we are at the he did it and it’s bad, but it’s not that bad phase.

I guess TC didnt read the transcript, cause Trump asked no such thing

read for yourself

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770
 
Have you all not heard news? Now it’s official.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/tr...-comes-forward-trump-ukraine-scandal-n1062961

A second whistleblower has come forward with information about President Donald Trump’s call with the president of Ukraine, according to attorneys representing that whistleblower and the intelligence official whose earlier complaint set off a series of events culminating in an impeachment inquiry.

The second whistleblower "has first-hand knowledge" of the events, according to attorney Mark Zaid.

yeah, BS..........what can the LEAKER us thats NOT in the transcript

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770

:cool:

might as well try the 3rd
 
Have you all not heard news? Now it’s official.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/tr...-comes-forward-trump-ukraine-scandal-n1062961

A second whistleblower has come forward with information about President Donald Trump’s call with the president of Ukraine, according to attorneys representing that whistleblower and the intelligence official whose earlier complaint set off a series of events culminating in an impeachment inquiry.

The second whistleblower "has first-hand knowledge" of the events, according to attorney Mark Zaid.

It just keeps getting worse.

And they keep spinning like a whirling dervish. Of course, 45 could quite literally shoot someone in the street and the morally bankrupt deplorables would say it's no big deal.
 
its always the NEXT time....the NEXT TIME we will get him

at first it was MULELIAR TIME.....when he turned DUD

it was WB#1.....when that turned DUD

its WB#2.....when that turns BS

it will be.....WB#3.....when that turns DUD

it will be Aliens from Uranus with new info:)
 
It just keeps getting worse.

And they keep spinning like a whirling dervish. Of course, 45 could quite literally shoot someone in the street and the morally bankrupt deplorables would say it's no big deal.

how many times you gonna repeat this shit??????????????

we got it the 63rd time:rolleyes:
 
A second whistleblower has come forward with information about President Donald Trump’s call with the president of Ukraine, according to attorneys representing that whistleblower and the intelligence official whose earlier complaint set off a series of events culminating in an impeachment inquiry.

The second whistleblower "has first-hand knowledge" of the events, according to attorney Mark Zaid.

Have you all not heard news? Now it’s official.


THIS LOOKS LIKE A REPRISE OF THE KAVANAUGH APPROACH,:cool: WHERE ONE BOGUS ACCUSATION IS FOLLOWED BY ANOTHER EVEN MORE BOGUS ONE:


:cool: A second “whistleblower” may be coming forth. Does it matter? Who will be the Michael Avenatti of this “scandal.”:confused:
 
Zogby is a D and a Muslim

So he Hates America and Trump

BUT

HMM: Zogby hits polls: ‘I do not hear anyone talking about impeachment’ in Midwest.
 
its always the NEXT time....the NEXT TIME we will get him

at first it was MULELIAR TIME.....when he turned DUD

it was WB#1.....when that turned DUD

its WB#2.....when that turns BS

it will be.....WB#3.....when that turns DUD

it will be Aliens from Uranus with new info:)

They’ve been trying to get Trump from day one and it has been a disaster for them. The whole Democrat Party now looks like a party of fucking dingbats hellbent on impeaching Trump with nothing else to bring to the table.
 
A very large number of Americans don’t have high levels of trust and respect for the government, and they’re generally OK with Trump being the junkyard dog who digs it all out,” CNBC* discovers, to explain “why Trump’s poll numbers are defying the impeachment mess.:cool:
 
They’ve been trying to get Trump from day one and it has been a disaster for them. The whole Democrat Party now looks like a party of fucking dingbats hellbent on impeaching Trump with nothing else to bring to the table.

actually

Vanity Fair started it BEFORE the election
 
Marc Thiessen: Sorry, Dems: It’s OK to ask for foreign help in a criminal justice investigation.


https://katrinapierson.com/thiessen...ign-help-in-a-criminal-justice-investigation/



But keep in mind, it was the Democrats who told us there is nothing wrong or illegal with a presidential candidate hiring a private lawyer to conduct opposition research in a foreign country on their political opponents. After it emerged that the Clinton campaign and the DNC had paid Christopher Steele to dig up dirt in Russia on Trump, the Democrats’ defense was: That’s just opposition research. Everyone does it.
 
Marc Thiessen: Sorry, Dems: It’s OK to ask for foreign help in a criminal justice investigation.


https://katrinapierson.com/thiessen...ign-help-in-a-criminal-justice-investigation/



But keep in mind, it was the Democrats who told us there is nothing wrong or illegal with a presidential candidate hiring a private lawyer to conduct opposition research in a foreign country on their political opponents. After it emerged that the Clinton campaign and the DNC had paid Christopher Steele to dig up dirt in Russia on Trump, the Democrats’ defense was: That’s just opposition research. Everyone does it.

Yes, nothing but excuses. When a so-called president openly asks foreign governments to investigate U.S. citizens for political reasons, it's criminal activity. It is not "opposition research".

Excuses, excuses, excuses. Nothing but excuses. I'm guessing if Obama had done this you pathetic deplorables would have fine with this activity, right?
 
Back
Top