which is more annoying?

which is more annoying?

  • Q, with his victim attitude

    Votes: 7 23.3%
  • Debbie and her ilk who defend him

    Votes: 5 16.7%
  • both, and presidential candidates

    Votes: 18 60.0%

  • Total voters
    30
rimmy said:

Rimmy I need to move to your country so that infighting doesn't lead to me not being to get anything.
 
dgreen said:
Ahh. Yeah she has this kind of random cameo in it WAY before she was "famous".

Was that movie before or after Cat In the Hat?

She had a cameo in that, too.

Early on, she was only known for being a spoiled party whore.

Now... well... she's a famous stupid spoiled party whore.
 
RawHumor said:
Was that movie before or after Cat In the Hat?

She had a cameo in that, too.

Early on, she was only known for being a spoiled party whore.

Now... well... she's a famous stupid spoiled party whore.

According to IMDB Zoolander is 2 years ahead of Cat and the Hat.
 
gravyrug said:
I missed the final results of that one. I'll bet she conceded graciously, though.

I'll admit to being a bit biased towards Debbie, if only because I know people she's sent cookies to.


I wonder if anyone here is still in touch with her.
 
This is without doubt the funniest thread in the history of Lit.
 
BlackShanglan said:
Laughed until I cried. Bless you for finding it, Sean. I've bookmarked it properly now.
nah, you should see the thread where Sean spazzes out about someone calling him a racist, or the one where his failed relationship with dolf is discussed.
 
DV81 said:
nah, you should see the thread where Sean spazzes out about someone calling him a racist, or the one where his failed relationship with dolf is discussed.

I can't see them beating a discussion of that famous American writer George Orwell, or "Death of a Salesman" as a formative American novel.
 
pink_ said:
i'm sorry but the word succubus makes me giggle.

You'll like the thread. :D Plenty of succbi (the plural being even more delightfully silly) and a discussion of whether Egypt and Greece might be the same continent. And so forth.
 
o geez, where'd this come from?

i don't think scott asked for its reappearance this time.
 
CrackerjackHrt said:
o geez, where'd this come from?

i don't think scott asked for its reappearance this time.
you seem to show up anytime I am mentioned, why is that?
This doesn't bother me, much to the chagrin of my critics.
 
CrackerjackHrt said:
o geez, where'd this come from?

i don't think scott asked for its reappearance this time.

Sean remembered it when we were laughing over the wonton thread, and had the decency to kick it up. I have to agree with him that this one is even funnier, although the wonton thread is ... interesting.
 
BlackShanglan said:
Sean remembered it when we were laughing over the wonton thread, and had the decency to kick it up. I have to agree with him that this one is even funnier, although the wonton thread is ... interesting.
so, do you give him a reach around?

you seem to be awfully close to sean.
 
DV81 said:
you seem to show up anytime I am mentioned, why is that?
This doesn't bother me, much to the chagrin of my critics.

i lurve you

:heart:
 
DV81 said:
its called baiting and the morons fell for it.
They come back saying I dont know the difference between a novel and play, and its just too damn amusing seeing them pontificate, as if my reply was serious.

Oh, is that you? I have trouble keeping up with alts.

Sorry, but that was hysterical. For someone who wasn't serious, you offered some fascinating defenses. I particularly liked the observation that 1984 has "American themes."

"I wasn't serious; I was just saying silly things to make you people look sillier when you responded" is, by the way, one of the oldest, saddest, and most toothless excuses on the Internet. It's the conversational equivalent of marching into battle armed with a dead frog.
 
BlackShanglan said:
Oh, is that you? I have trouble keeping up with alts.

Sorry, but that was hysterical. For someone who wasn't serious, you offered some fascinating defenses. I particularly liked the observation that 1984 has "American themes."

"I wasn't serious; I was just saying silly things to make you people look sillier when you responded" is, by the way, one of the oldest, saddest, and most toothless excuses on the Internet. It's the conversational equivalent of marching into battle armed with a dead frog.
you trolling people who have never had an actual conversation with you before is lame. I can see why you get along so well with sean.

btw, I dont have alts.
 
DV81 said:
you trolling people who have never had an actual conversation with you before is lame. I can see why you get along so well with sean.

Well, I wasn't trolling you, but now that I know that you're the comic genius behind the novels of Descartes, I confess that it will be difficult not to hope for more.

btw, I dont have alts.

Originally Posted by DV81
its called baiting and the morons fell for it.
They come back saying I dont know the difference between a novel and play, and its just too damn amusing seeing them pontificate, as if my reply was serious.

So you refer to the poster in the bumped thread as "I" because ... ?
 
Back
Top