Incest Restrictions Is Bullshit

He's trying to make the argument that if it's permissible for 1st cousins to marry, then other forms of incest should be permissible. Clearly, that is a false equivalency, and he knows it.
I wasn't making that point at all. The point I was making was that if you want to know the facts, do the research!!!!
 
He's trying to make the argument that if it's permissible for 1st cousins to marry, then other forms of incest should be permissible. Clearly, that is a false equivalency, and he knows it.
that is not what i said ass wipe if its incest then its incest only someone like you would leave it out so you could make a point.
 
I very much wish they did!

The power imbalance between a parent and a stepchild is the very same as with a biological child. This means there can never be true consent! Even once the child is over 18, the fact remains that they were raised to regard the parent as a trusted authority figure. And if they still live at home, there is the matter of the parent controlling their access to food, shelter, safety. ...Yeah, fetishizing stepchild/parent relations is fucking gross. Why is this so hard for some people to understand?

I wonder what underlies these sorts of fetishes? My hunch is it is the playground of deeply insecure, low self-esteem men who feel their only hope of ever getting laid is through some sort of coercive leverage.

Some people have a hard time understanding that Sex Positivity - which is the stated goal of Literotica - does NOT mean that everything goes, sexually. Sex positivity requires TRUE consent, which is consent that is without any coercion or leverage. ..Otherwise, you're fetishizing sexual violence.

And no, I'm not trying to be a high-minded sexual moralist. I'm just doing my best to be a decent, while highly sexual, person.
Why do you say incest stories on lit involes parents coercing? I've read... the man is in late 30s, independent and has his own life, visits his home and there's romance with his mom who's in her 50s. Where's the coercion?
I've read some where the daughter is dominating her mother.
 
Why do you say incest stories on lit involes parents coercing? I've read... the man is in late 30s, independent and has his own life, visits his home and there's romance with his mom who's in her 50s. Where's the coercion?
I've read some where the daughter is dominating her mother.

Again.. to suggest that this thread is about peoples' frustration over their inability to write about what you describe above is disingenuous.
 
Again.. to suggest that this thread is about peoples' frustration over their inability to write about what you describe above is disingenuous.
I didn't suggest the thread is about inability to write the kind of stories I described. Whatever you're smoking, I want some. If you're not smoking anything, then I'm confused

The original post is about porn sites using "step" in their videos. Comments suggests they are for avoiding legal problems. So I asked why doesn't lit place similar restrictions to its stories and force writers to write "step".

And your reply to that was "very much wish they did" and then went on talking about parents coercing. What does coercing has to do with being "step" or not... Nothing. Why do I say that... One, because you said that in the very next sentence. And two, I'm not smoking whatever you're smoking, and if you're not high on anything then I'm confused

So I thought of bringing you off your high horse(mostly out of jealousy that I'm not high with whatever you're smoking)... I hinted that parents coercing has nothing to do with my questions about Lit placing restrictions to its stories, and gave you examples of the opposite of your claims. And your reply... I'm suggesting the thread is about the inability to write such stories.

Buddy... I really want whatever you're high on. It'd be lerfect gor this weekend
 
Buddy? ..Lol.

Dude...

Rather than re-hash my previous posts, alllow me to simplify matters and just re-state my feelings on all this..

As someone who has published stories and has posted regularly on the forums, I am quite glad that Literotica prohibits stories and forum posts that glorify incest. Is that simple enough for you? I don't care if their reasons are legal, or moral, I'm glad, all the same. I only wish that Literotica could find a way to ensure that people are honest about their gender when they register. :ROFLMAO:

As for your interest in my THC habits. ..I'm happy to report that I do not imbibe. Obviously, you do... which is fine. But you might consider slowing your roll as it may explain why you're struggling to follow this thread.
 
Last edited:
I am quite glad that Literotica prohibits stories and forum posts that glorify incest.
No lit doesn't.
That's my very point.
That's the point in the first few words in the very first post of this thread.
Lit allows incest stories with "mom" and "dad". It doesn't push you to use "step mom" and "step dad" like porn websites do
I'm happy to report that I do not imbibe.
As I said... If this is you while not high then I'm confused
 
As someone who has published stories and has posted regularly on the forums, I am quite glad that Literotica prohibits stories and forum posts that glorify incest. Is that simple enough for you?

Taboo/Incest Sex Stories Hub​


See if you can guess which site hosts this.
 
No lit doesn't.
That's my very point.
That's the point in the first few words in the very first post of this thread.
Lit allows incest stories with "mom" and "dad". It doesn't push you to use "step mom" and "step dad" like porn websites do

As I said... If this is you while not high then I'm confused
Yep.. I get it now. My bad.

My reading comprehension is usually pretty solid. But this subject is sooo fucking icky to me that I have been basically scanning the other posts in this thread, rather than reading them carefully, as I normally do. So, yes... I misunderstood what was being discussed.

Yes, I know Lit has a Taboo/ Incest forum and although I've never once visited it, it was my understanding that the stories/ discussions could not involve anyone under 18 yrs old. I was responding to the idea that incest - at any age - is somehow less damaging if it involves step relations instead of biological, and should therefore be allowed. So yes, I get it now. I was arguing about one thing while you, and the others, were arguing about something else. Again, my bad.... and my apologies for jumping into a discussion without fulling understanding what's being discussed.

Now... If only I can forgive myself for offending a bunch of men whose kink is incest . :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top