When vice presidents shoot people (satire, of course)

G

Guest

Guest
Mostly I love the Quayle bit (shote!). - Perdita

When vice presidents shoot people - Talking points and protocol tips from the White House Press Office. By Cary Tennis, salon.com

Feb. 14, 2006 | From time to time, the vice president will shoot a man. This is not unusual nor is it cause for alarm. Vice presidents throughout history have shot men. Vice President Gerald Ford shot six men in one day. Vice President Dan Quayle once actually shote a man.

That these incidents have heretofore gone unreported only shows the good work this office has done throughout the years. That Vice President Dick Cheney's recent shooting was reported, by contrast, represents a failure that we prefer not to see repeated.

Therefore, measures to manage the fallout of this shooting must be taken, and certain future precautions must be considered.

Here are some guidelines.

When the vice president shoots a man, often that man will end up in the hospital. This raises a question of protocol: Should the vice president visit his victim in the hospital? Unanimous opinion is: By God no!

However, in some cases, a visit may be necessary. If the vice president's schedule cannot be rearranged to place him on the Space Shuttle, remember:

Bringing flowers sends the wrong message. Instead, bring something jokey and pointless, like beef jerky or a bag of Fritos. In fact, bring a bag of Fritos and a little joke, one that will recall President Ronald Reagan, something like, "Gee, you forgot to duck." What you want to convey is a manly, gee whiz sorry sort of jokey affection. Warmth, by contrast, is easily misconstrued.

In any event, as long as the victim does not die, the opportunity to send a message ought not be overlooked. Keep in mind: Getting shot is not the end of the world. What's a little birdshot in the face? It's important for us to join the National Rifle Association in getting this message out, especially now, as there is excessive concern about various people being shot around the world.

If for some reason the vice president shoots a man and he dies, then the issue of funerals arises. Funerals, when seen on TV, tend to remind viewers of death. Death is off-message. It is not something with which to associate the vice president. (Hunting is on-message, although not the hunting of a 78-year-old lawyer from Austin.)

If it should become necessary for the vice president to attend the funeral of a man he has shot, he ought to dress in camouflage to plant in the mind of the viewer the idea that the shooting occurred in combat.

Additional points:

It was suggested in our discussions that the vice president henceforth carry a shotgun at all public appearances. The possibility of him taking a potshot, the reasoning goes, would limit press attendance at routine events. It would also increase efficiency at press conferences by limiting questioning time, as questioning would be conducted from behind one-inch-thick steel-plate barricades. This would also provide a credible pretext for the vice president to claim that he "did not quite catch that question," daring the questioner to expose his head and ask it again.

The legality of this proposal is currently under review but it is believed that irrespective of legal precedent, the president has the inherent right to arm the vice president with a shotgun whenever he feels it is necessary to do so.
 
Too funny, P. But I am certainly surprised that there was no response in this article (LOL - still laughing) to how the VP bypassed the Presidential protocols and LOL what a fiasco (still laughing at article ... sad for the friend in the hospital, though. Do you think Cheney will become an anti-gun advocate? :D
 
Well, Cheney is no Ted Kennedy when it comes to attempted cover-ups, but keeping it quiet for 24 hours in this day and age of instant access world media is still pretty damn good.

Speaking of Ted Kennedy, the other day I was in a bar and had a drink called a Chappaquiddick. It was Scotch and murky water.
 
Boota said:
Well, Cheney is no Ted Kennedy when it comes to attempted cover-ups, but keeping it quiet for 24 hours in this day and age of instant access world media is still pretty damn good.

Speaking of Ted Kennedy, the other day I was in a bar and had a drink called a Chappaquiddick. It was Scotch and murky water.

What was the murky water part? Dare I ask. :eek:
 
CharleyH said:
What was the murky water part? Dare I ask. :eek:

It was in reference to the murky water that Ted Kennedy allowed Mary Jo Kopechne to drown in when he drove his car off a bridge and into a pond in Chappaquiddick, Mass. Just a sick little joke. Everyone move along. Nothing to see here. :)
 
Boota said:
It was in reference to the murky water that Ted Kennedy allowed Mary Jo Kopechne to drown in when he drove his car off a bridge and into a pond in Chappaquiddick, Mass. Just a sick little joke. Everyone move along. Nothing to see here. :)

I know ;) Do you think he (Cheney) will be charged with involuntary manslaughter like you and I would be ... or do you think it will be another, well, its not a cover up this time. If he goes free? What does that say about America?
 
If the guy had died right there I wouldn't be surprised if someone else would have been chosen to take the fall for it. They might have even flown in a special patsy from the stables for that one.
 
Back
Top