When the lit forums close

Won't it be like Spartacus when he says "You can't win, Vader. If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine."
 
I'll just go back to the zither forum sites. Plenty of action there.
 
My Playboy subscription is really gonna take the edge off.
My postman is a bugger for opening it first though
 
Call me crazy but doesn't this go against your 1st Amendment rights? And what right does Congress have to police the interwebz? Last time I looked there were no borders on the net. I'm surprised more people aren't upset by this. If there is even a whiff of 2nd Amendment rights being interfered with the media and forums get all up in arms about it (sorry couldn't resist). Imo freedom of speech is far more important than the right to bear arms. This Communications Decency Act isn't new, is it? So why isn't there a huge outcry about it? Especially on a word porn site? Just askin'.
 
Call me crazy but doesn't this go against your 1st Amendment rights? And what right does Congress have to police the interwebz? Last time I looked there were no borders on the net. I'm surprised more people aren't upset by this. If there is even a whiff of 2nd Amendment rights being interfered with the media and forums get all up in arms about it (sorry couldn't resist). Imo freedom of speech is far more important than the right to bear arms. This Communications Decency Act isn't new, is it? So why isn't there a huge outcry about it? Especially on a word porn site? Just askin'.

You're crazy.
No one is talking about 1st amendment rights.
Tits or GTFO.
 
If Lit gets canned, I'm gonna be pissed.

THANKS, AMERICA! :mad::mad::mad:
 
True, I'm crazy, but not as crazy as the people who watch their right to free speech being dismantled and do nothing about it.
Boner or gtfo.



Ty. Your pragmatism and directness are appreciated.

Your rights are not being fringed upon here. Quit being dumb.
 
You're right mine aren't but if they were I'd be a tad upset.
Again, for the hard of reading, boner or gtfo.

Situational poutrage is limited to the BroPatrol. Please find your own form of whiny bitchism.
 
Now that net neutrality is dead and internet is closer to being considered the same as telecom by regulators, it seems to me that if web site operators are going to be held responsible for sex trafficking, the telecoms should also.

cuz sex workers are booked by telephones as much as the interwebs, or at least that's what roary does.
 
Now that net neutrality is dead and internet is closer to being considered the same as telecom by regulators, it seems to me that if web site operators are going to be held responsible for sex trafficking, the telecoms should also.

cuz sex workers are booked by telephones as much as the interwebs, or at least that's what roary does.

STFU, Brooke.
 
Now that net neutrality is dead and internet is closer to being considered the same as telecom by regulators, it seems to me that if web site operators are going to be held responsible for sex trafficking, the telecoms should also.

cuz sex workers are booked by telephones as much as the interwebs, or at least that's what roary does.

Regulating any form of communication seems wrong to me but I hear ya.


Ooooh Testes, if I didn't know better I'd assume you were flirting with me.:rose::rose::rose:

I (shudder) see your boner, and call. Pair of boners.

https://media.giphy.com/media/WGPhLR3ETGdqw/giphy.gif

*blushes*
I like a man that accommodates my needs, even in the face of adversity. Ty. :kiss:
 
That's because CL caved in to the fascist overlords. They should have stood their ground. CL aleady had a rule that prohibited soliticitation of sex for money, so why are they afraid? It's BackP that should be worried, that's where the hookers go. And there's a difference between a hooker being self-made on his or her own will and someone forced to be in the trafficking industry. CL looks stupid caving in for a bunch of puritanical hypocrites, setting a dangerous precedence.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top