What Wiki Thinks Of Us

bg23 said:
Oh, and by the way, your filing a legal action would produce a legal connection between you and this place, allowing people to sue YOUR racist hateful ass for every racist comment and threat that you've ever posted.

It'd indicate that you view the boards as a forum for serious communication -- and if so, then your threats must also be taken as serious. If you take what others say to you seriously, then what you say in return is certainly also that -- which means of course you'd be up for verbal assault, too, I imagine, without even having to prove actual malicious intent.

Oh, and your wishings for holocausts are, i believe to be of note for inspiring hatred and racism, etc.

This is of course assuming that you manage to convince a gullible enough lawyer that he has a case for poor wittle killswitch who got his feelwings hurt on the intrawebs. *laughs*

WooHoo! I could end up owning .005% of a lawn mower!
 
_geisha_ said:
first of all.. i want to know who designated my ferocious community shit for public use? second, this is why people can't stand this fucking place, idiots like ma_guy who would actually go and edit the wiki page to have killswitch's handle in it. who cares if it's not his name, that shit is fuckin embarassing.

that embarasses me to be part of this place, that ya'll can't even do something big and do it classy.

fuck.

and whoever used my ferocious community phrase owes me some fuckin candy, some cakes, some cookies, some shit.


What the hell are you talking about?

Are you claiming that you wrote the original Wiki article?
 
Killswitch said:
He also has a lot of legal grounds here.

I might just run this by a percentage lawyer.

no grounds.

no one knows it's you.

because you are posting under an anonymous moniker, you have not been defamed.

killswitch arguably has, though that truth is a defense bit hurts. but no court's gonna keep a case styled killswitch v. queersetti and ma_guy on its docket.
 
CrackerjackHrt said:
no grounds.

no one knows it's you.

because you are posting under an anonymous moniker, you have not been defamed.

killswitch arguably has, though that truth is a defense bit hurts. but no court's gonna keep a case styled killswitch v. queersetti and ma_guy on its docket.


My attorney is going to defend me by claiming that Scotty's cousin was using my account.
 
Queersetti said:
My attorney is going to defend me by claiming that Scotty's cousin was using my account.

it was his uncle.

don't screw your defense by getting the facts wrong.

hmm. on second thought, scotty's inability to keep his facts straight actually helps you with that defense. no malice.

carry on.
 
I looked myself up in Wiki and I didn't like what it had to say:

Jailhouse: Mostly harmless.
 
CrackerjackHrt said:
it was his uncle.

don't screw your defense by getting the facts wrong.

hmm. on second thought, scotty's inability to keep his facts straight actually helps you with that defense. no malice.

carry on.
you're a loser. so is your muffin cohort.
 
DV81 said:
We should go hunting together. Take me up on that offer?

Do not do this to yourself. You will end up with your pants down and asshole lubed just like all the other times.
 
SaintPeter said:
Do not do this to yourself. You will end up with your pants down and asshole lubed just like all the other times.
hey loser, the SO says stop pm'ing her and get a life of your own.
Dont make me bury you, lil man.
 
DV81 said:
We should go hunting together. Take me up on that offer?

see?

a relatively benign observation gets your goat.*

any more violent threats to deliver?



___________
* Horses of a highly-strung nature were often accompanied by a goat (or a sheep). It was a way of calming a horse down, especially a horse before a race. The legend has it that rivals and crooks deliberately betting against that horse, would steal the goat, resulting in the horse being upset and less able to race. Such practices are uncommon these days, although it was said to be common in America in the early 20th Century.
 
CrackerjackHrt said:
see?

a relatively benign observation gets your goat.*

any more violent threats to deliver?
no, I'll just put you and SP on ignore since it seems difficult for both of you to be civil. Its the same old shit, antagonize someone for no reason.

btw, it wasn't a violent response, you just interpreted it that way.
 
DV81 said:
hey loser, the SO says stop pm'ing her and get a life of your own.
Dont make me bury you, lil man.

Post it!

Yeah, right. Just go ahead and make one up.
 
SaintPeter said:
Post it!

Yeah, right. Just go ahead and make one up.
just like you make up lies about me, you pathetic excuse for a person.
 
This message is hidden because SaintPeter is on your ignore list.

Oh well, guess I wont see the reasons why SP denied lying about me.
 
CrackerjackHrt said:
heh.

if you say so.

though i think history provides context.
I have been civil to you and yet you feel the need to jump on the bandwagon. Tread carefully.
 
DV81 said:
This message is hidden because SaintPeter is on your ignore list.

Oh well, guess I wont see the reasons why SP denied lying about me.

You saw the Superman condom post. Don't lie about it.
 
Back
Top