What makes a good Porno - Part 3

[ozbloke1980]

I have done this brainstorm a couple of times now and one of the things that kept cropping up was to use real everyday people. I'm just wondering does that mean that they don't have to look like they spend their every waking moment in a gym. Seems that's what most porn stars look like.

 

[stageleft]

hopeless

what a let down it is when guys in pornos try to give a girl a full on facial only to leak out a puny weak dribble onto her chin...why do they hire these faliures!!!

 

[covariant]

I think amateur porn is really hot. If it seems like the people having sex actually know and like each other, it's a lot more exciting. And if the woman really cums, that's hot too.

 

[ozbloke1980]

I think amateur porn is really hot. If it seems like the people having sex actually know and like each other, it's a lot more exciting. And if the woman really cums, that's hot too.

I haven't seen much amature stuff so I take it that the sex scenes in amature porn looks more realistic and convincing

 

[Xenolan]

I must be in the minority, because I actually prefer the flawless, model-perfect pornstar look. When I'm watching porn, it's because I'm fueling my fantasies, and I'm happy when everything is perfect.

The only benefit to amateur porn is that sometimes it can appear so much more real, but more often than not I find that they're just plain bad actors, and furthermore they're less attractive and the quality of the camerawork is crappy. The amateurs tend not to show their moves to the camera, letting their hair get in the way or showing the back of their heads when they're sucking or kissing on something instead of showing the action. But what really bugs me about far too many amateur movies is that the cameraman just won't shut the hell up! This is especially distracting when it's a man shooting a lesbian scene. If I wanted to see or hear men, would I be watching lesbians? NO!! So park your damned ego and shut your hole!

Professional pornstars often look generically fake and their scenes are done with simulated passion, but overall I still prefer that look for fantasies. In reality, it's a different story.

In real life, I'm generally looking for something more than a masturbatory image, and prefer women who don't look like mannequins. Women never seem to understand that there is a major difference, and that the slight bump in their nose that they hate or the slight plumpness that they'd do anything to work off is exactly what makes them far more appealing than a Barbie Doll.

 

[Dallass_Drake]

Most of the Porno I watch has well established male pornstars who generally look like Atlas, but I quite like them for their rough and tumble approach and their often quite humerous banter (I couldn't name any of them except Erik Everhard, the rest seem to be his established clique). However recently I purchased a mini bukkake type venture in which the director, I believe he was called Chico Wang, would often haul his obesity, hairiness and meagre cock into an arena containing several of those aformentioned burly gentlemen surrounding a delicate rose and I actually found myself quite aroused as the lady set upon him with a blow job. There is certainly a lubricious pleasure in seeing such men being serviced by beautiful women, one that I'm fairly familiar with, for example I also have a penchant for seeing much older men with younger ladies, and bukkake generally where bloaters are commonplace. The studio 'Private' also seems to have a roster containing rather unimpressive men who generally star in their various anal speciality flicks, albeit they have particularly long phallus' with much girth.

Personally I have never had a taste for amateur porn however I find amateur porn performed by professionals to be quite irresistable. For example, I'll often watch long winded introductions in which the (Normal, everyday, innocuous, yet recognizable) lady is approached in the street and deceived, and that placated with money to do various ungodly acts. It's a pleasing thought that I could have such a capability although cowardice is too strong within me to have tried that yet. The website 'Teens for Cash' is amongst my favourites because it combines this premise with a strong peccadillo I have for seeing elder genetleman with younger ladies.

 

[human_male]

For me there's German Goo Girls, and that's it. And it's not the bukkake either, in fact that can be kinda off-putting when they get it in their eye and stuff. It's just the women are so into it and the fucking is just so... awesome. No other porn will do.

 

[covariant]

For me there's German Goo Girls, and that's it. And it's not the bukkake either, in fact that can be kinda off-putting when they get it in their eye and stuff. It's just the women are so into it and the fucking is just so... awesome. No other porn will do.

Hmmm, gotta check that out...

This is what really does it for me: http://www.wifeysworld.com I have one of their early tapes ("Wifey's Oral Extravaganza") and it still does the job for me after literally hundreds of viewings...

 

[java_man_05]

Make me believe it.

What human_male and covariant said struck a chord with me. I think the hottest porn I've seen always has one common link - and that is that the women seem into it. I love Wifey at WifeysWorld for that reason, plus she has a great laugh! I always go back and watch a certain threesome scene with Olivia del Rio in a Private film because she is so into it. In the best amateur porn you get the same effect.

 

[ozbloke1980]

I must be in the minority, because I actually prefer the flawless, model-perfect pornstar look. When I'm watching porn, it's because I'm fueling my fantasies, and I'm happy when everything is perfect.

The only benefit to amateur porn is that sometimes it can appear so much more real, but more often than not I find that they're just plain bad actors, and furthermore they're less attractive and the quality of the camerawork is crappy. The amateurs tend not to show their moves to the camera, letting their hair get in the way or showing the back of their heads when they're sucking or kissing on something instead of showing the action. But what really bugs me about far too many amateur movies is that the cameraman just won't shut the hell up! This is especially distracting when it's a man shooting a lesbian scene. If I wanted to see or hear men, would I be watching lesbians? NO!! So park your damned ego and shut your hole!

Professional pornstars often look generically fake and their scenes are done with simulated passion, but overall I still prefer that look for fantasies. In reality, it's a different story.

In real life, I'm generally looking for something more than a masturbatory image, and prefer women who don't look like mannequins. Women never seem to understand that there is a major difference, and that the slight bump in their nose that they hate or the slight plumpness that they'd do anything to work off is exactly what makes them far more appealing than a Barbie Doll.

Yeah it seems that you are in the minority. Cuz it seems that most of us are sick of seeing generically fakes. I think most people wanna see real people in them cuz there's a chance you might know or see them walking down the street kind of thing.

 

[ozbloke1980]

I must be in the minority, because I actually prefer the flawless, model-perfect pornstar look. When I'm watching porn, it's because I'm fueling my fantasies, and I'm happy when everything is perfect.

The only benefit to amateur porn is that sometimes it can appear so much more real, but more often than not I find that they're just plain bad actors, and furthermore they're less attractive and the quality of the camerawork is crappy. The amateurs tend not to show their moves to the camera, letting their hair get in the way or showing the back of their heads when they're sucking or kissing on something instead of showing the action. But what really bugs me about far too many amateur movies is that the cameraman just won't shut the hell up! This is especially distracting when it's a man shooting a lesbian scene. If I wanted to see or hear men, would I be watching lesbians? NO!! So park your damned ego and shut your hole!

Professional pornstars often look generically fake and their scenes are done with simulated passion, but overall I still prefer that look for fantasies. In reality, it's a different story.

In real life, I'm generally looking for something more than a masturbatory image, and prefer women who don't look like mannequins. Women never seem to understand that there is a major difference, and that the slight bump in their nose that they hate or the slight plumpness that they'd do anything to work off is exactly what makes them far more appealing than a Barbie Doll.

By the way just out of curiosity. When you watch a porno do you use the Fast Forward Button Much?

 

[Xenolan]

By the way just out of curiosity. When you watch a porno do you use the Fast Forward Button Much?

Only when I'm ready to finish - at that point, I'll generally skip to a particularly appealing image to let loose on.

I also skip the parts that are totally unappealing to me, usually anal in nature.

 

[ozbloke1980]

Only when I'm ready to finish - at that point, I'll generally skip to a particularly appealing image to let loose on.

I also skip the parts that are totally unappealing to me, usually anal in nature.

Ah ok fair enough. The reason I ask is cuz of a rather amusing comment by by PT Anderson in the directors commentory on the Boggy Nights DVD Re: Comparing modern day porn with that of the 70s "You do not have time for a plot. He has a fast forward button"

 

[liv2lik]

I must say that I really liked t he porn that was being made in the 70's . It's hard to pinpoint what the difference is. I think current porn is too contrived. There seems to be a definite formula...ending with a facial cumshot. NO woman I have ever had sex with has prefered a facial cumshot. The 70's porn seemed to have more variation. I aslo think the performers thought of themselves more as actors...they had lines...there were scripts...lol.
I'm not sure if I can describe this well, but, in 70's porn There was an effort to imitate real life. In current porn I always feel like I'm just watching a prostitute have sex with her John and she can't wait for him to pop so she can get paid.

 

[ozbloke1980]

I must say that I really liked t he porn that was being made in the 70's . It's hard to pinpoint what the difference is. I think current porn is too contrived. There seems to be a definite formula...ending with a facial cumshot. NO woman I have ever had sex with has prefered a facial cumshot. The 70's porn seemed to have more variation. I aslo think the performers thought of themselves more as actors...they had lines...there were scripts...lol.
I'm not sure if I can describe this well, but, in 70's porn There was an effort to imitate real life. In current porn I always feel like I'm just watching a prostitute have sex with her John and she can't wait for him to pop so she can get paid.

I think you've hit the nail on the head there. Does it seem to be since porn converted to video that this has changed. One of the more recent ones I've seen has basically been wall to wall sex scenes. Whatever happened to the idea of a movie where there's a plot and even the guy with the fast forward button would think twice about using it.

 

[ozbloke1980]

Hubby and I watch porn occasionally...we prefer to see the real people..and the older ones ..I guess thats our agetalking..real people...wrinkles, sags...much hotter than all the phonies....just my opinion.. ..marie

I agree. Alot if not all of teh female porn stars look like barbie doll wannabes with boobs that are faker than a three buck note.

I maybe a young guy but I definatly have an old school attitude to porn