What if WHITES really did this? Why havent we heard of this??????

busybody..

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 28, 2002
Posts
149,503
Hate crime hoax at Ole Miss




http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | A terrible racial incident took place at Trent Lott's alma mater last month. But you won't hear about it from Dan Rather or Time magazine or the Washington Post or the NAACP.







That's because what happened at the University of Mississippi in the early morning hours of Nov. 6 has all the markings of a fake hate crime: An apparent racial hoax committed by black students against black students, but blamed on whites--until the suspects were nabbed last week.


Three black freshmen were accused by the college of scrawling racist graffiti on the doors of two other black students in the Kincannon residence hall on the Oxford campus. Among the hateful epithets: "F-----g N----r" and "F------ Hoe N---r." Also left on walls and doors spanning three floors of the dorm: A tree with a noose and hanging stick figure and vulgar references to genitalia drawn in blue window chalk.


The financial damage was estimated at roughly $600. But the cultural and psychological damage caused by such crude and twisted acts of Tawana Brawleyism is inestimable. The element of racial animus cloaks the hate crime hoax with a false sense of legitimacy. It's a manipulative attempt to exploit old tensions and deflect suspicion from the actual perpetrators.


At the time the racist vandalism appeared, Ole Miss was commemorating the 40th anniversary of desegregation of its classrooms. Local and national observers immediately assumed the vandals were white.


Black students organized a "Say No to Racism" march and demanded more protection against white-on-black harassment. They blasted the school's president for not apologizing quickly enough for the racial slurs. The school's "Minority Affairs" director demanded that the university establish "programs and procedures" to ensure racial sensitivity and prevent hate crimes. The "Institute for Racial Reconciliation" and the "Committee On Sensitivity and Respect" convened meetings. Activists called for criminally prosecuting the perpetrators under state felony laws or federal hate crime statutes.


But now that the race of the suspects has been revealed, some are seeking to minimize the crime as a "prank." The college will not be bringing criminal charges against the trio. Instead, each suspect faces charges involving five violations of the student code of conduct--not only for the racially explosive vandalism, but also for allegedly making false and misleading statements to investigators.


That's right. It wasn't enough for these accused sickos to adopt racial terror tactics, destroy property, cast false suspicion on others, and cast doubt on all bona fide victims of such perfidy. They apparently tried to lie their way out of it, too.


The Daily Mississippian student newspaper noted that an "irritated Chancellor Robert Khayat said the entire situation was 'regrettable,' but it taught the university community that no members 'should engage in abusive behavior' and 'before we jump to conclusions and start condemning groups of people, we should know what happened.'"


All well and good, but why allow a double standard of justice to prevail? If the attackers had been white, they faced possible federal prison time. Because the suspects are black, the most serious consequence they face is expulsion. Welcome to equal treatment under the law, 2002-style.


Where is the uproar over the hoaxers' callous use of lynching imagery and flagrant exploitation of the N-word--at Ole Miss of all places? And where is the national press on this matter? Fake hate crimes are an abhorrently common phenomenon on modern college campuses, where race-consciousness reigns in such a poisonous way that it would make integrationists weep. "Students of color" are herded into separate dorms, separate departments, and separate graduation ceremonies.


Segregation is back all right. But while the media elite's crack reporters are busy rummaging through the dustbins of old history in an effort to paint all conservatives as racially insensitive relics, they continue to ignore one of the outrageous race scandals of the 21st century: how the young beneficiaries of the civil rights movement are squandering and desecrating its legacy of equal respect and justice for all.
 
Wasn't going to open, since Spin did...

I'll repeat the words of my President---we both understand why ultraCONs are mad.

http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/12/18/clinton.lott/

"How do they think they got a majority in the South anyway?" Clinton told CNN outside a business luncheon he was attending. "I think what they are really upset about is that he made public their strategy."

He added: "They try to suppress black voting, they ran on the Confederate flag in Georgia and South Carolina, and from top to bottom the Republicans supported it."

Asked if Lott should be removed, Clinton said, "That's up to them, but I think they can't do it with a straight face."

The former president then said, "He just embarrassed them by saying in Washington what they do on the back roads every day."
 
Pre-9/11 tell me one thing GWB did to prevent terrorism. Tell me the dates he had cabinet meetings with his principle cabinet members concerning terrorism---the only ones the NY TIMES and I am aware of are July 3rd and Sept 4th. Clinton's principle cabinet met repeatedly and made terrorism and Al Qaeda high priorities, unlike some (remember wag the dog). Clinton negociated to find a peaceful solution to the Palestinian and Israeli conflict, which most Muslims point to as their major beef with America. GWB has done the opposite---he then has the gall to blast Clinton for setting the standards too high, what a fucking dipshit.
 
You are comparing 1993 with 2001, I'm pretty sure Bin Laden publicly declared war on the USA in 1998. GWB didn't do shit about anything until 2900 people were dead. Why? How is he considered the Homeland Security President (democrat idea and bill that had to be forced down GWB's throat)? Clinton was reined in by whom in 1998? Clinton had plans to prevent attacks. He also had pre-existing plans to take down Bin Laden they were published by Time Magazine---GWB wouldn't consult with Democrat leadership at any cost.
 
Last edited:
70/30 said:
I'll repeat the words of my President---we both understand why ultraCONs are mad.

http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/12/18/clinton.lott/

"How do they think they got a majority in the South anyway?" Clinton told CNN outside a business luncheon he was attending. "I think what they are really upset about is that he made public their strategy."

He added: "They try to suppress black voting, they ran on the Confederate flag in Georgia and South Carolina, and from top to bottom the Republicans supported it."

Asked if Lott should be removed, Clinton said, "That's up to them, but I think they can't do it with a straight face."

The former president then said, "He just embarrassed them by saying in Washington what they do on the back roads every day."
What an ass. I won't even bother refuting his bullshit.

Morwen said:
That's nonsense, that's like equating all of Clinton's policies with the radical left, the stoned out 60s revolutionaries who left bombs under cop cars. Clinton in rhetoric was the campus leftist, Clinton in action was a comfortable centrist.
You're missing an important moment in political history: Clinton ran as a centrist, and governed his first two years clearly from the left. After a tax increase and an attempt to socialize health-care that was too liberal even for his own party, America voiced their opinion on his legislation by toppling the Dems' 40-year control of Congress.

Thereafter, he governed from the center because his political life depended on it. There was a new sheriff in town.

TB4p
 
teddybear4play said:
I won't even bother refuting...
TB4p


Hard to refute the truth. Why did Republicans run on the Confederate flag? In Georgia they coupled it with how unpatriotic Max Cleland is to broaden the appeal.

Backroad campaigning in the South is done in a certain prejudice inspiring way---tell me it's not, both with a straight face while hooked up to a polygraph.

Tell me why Ashcroft, Bush, and Lott all spoke at Bob Jones University, they wouldn't miss it for anything. Why not South Carolina State? You'd think they would go there at least once, I'm not surprised tho. Codewords and symbols---you don't have to be Jack Flack to be suspicious of that shit.
 
70/30 said:
Hard to refute the truth. Why did Republicans run on the Confederate flag? In Georgia they coupled it with how unpatriotic Max Cleland is to broaden the appeal.
Yeah, and the NAACP aired a commercial making a moral equivalency between George W. Bush and the scum who dragged James Byrd behind a pickup truck until he died. And Al Gore accused Republicans of not wanting to count blacks in the census and conservatives of wanting to re-enact the three-fifths clause. And Teddy Kennedy said that Robert Bork was an unabashed racist and sexist. Politics is dirty.

The first politician in South Carolina to publicly call for the Stars and Bars to be taken down from the State House was a Republican. The NAACP refused to get behind him because they wanted to corner the market on the issue.

70/30 said:
Backroad campaigning in the South is done in a certain prejudice inspiring way---tell me it's not, both with a straight face while hooked up to a polygraph.
Only if you read that shit into it. I won't deny that there may be a few Southern politicians of both parties who are racists, but guys like Trent Lott and Strom Thurmond don't pull down up to one-quarter of the African-American vote because they're racist.

70/30 said:
Tell me why Ashcroft, Bush, and Lott all spoke at Bob Jones University, they wouldn't miss it for anything. Why not South Carolina State? You'd think they would go there at least once, I'm not surprised tho. Codewords and symbols---you don't have to be Jack Flack to be suspicious of that shit.
Bush, Ashcroft, and Lott all spoke at BJU because Ronald Reagan spoke there in 1980. It's considered a pretty important spot for Republicans to speak. John McCain was scheduled to speak there until the brouhaha broke out over Bush's speech.

And BJU was only important because of the issue. Their ban on interracial dating was kinda like the law in Indiana that outlaws bathing in winter — technically on the books, but unenforced. It was quickly repealed once everyone made a fuss about it. The student body president who introduced George W. Bush for his speech in February 2000 was Asian-American. The year before, the University gave its top alumnus award to an African-American. And Bob Jones himself publicly came out against the Confederate flag flying on the South Carolina State House.

Furthermore, you can't even argue a slight racist bent for speaking at BJU because at none of them, to my memory, ever said pulled a Trent Lott and endorsed their viewpoint. It was simply never mentioned. Because nobody gave a shit, until their political enemies picked it up and tried to make a federal case out of it.

TB4p
 
GWB is more culpable for 9/11 than Clinton. Lott had a quote that was fitting for the situation, he blamed Clinton for allowing the Cole attack because it happened under his watch. Adhering to Mr. Lott's standards Bush should be impeached 170.5 times. Honor Trent's words---speed GWB's immense failures through the House and let Trent push it through the senate. It wasn't the just the rightwing fanatics from the 80's that fucked up. Edited to say: actually it was the 80's rightwingers---GWB brought a bunch of them back.


TB-How can Rove get the fame for micromanaging an election that allowed the Republicans to capture the senate but take no responsibility for dirty tactics?

DC does get involved in those tactics. Definite schemes were used to defeat McCain in South Carolina, pretty sure that's why he didn't go to BJU. The following article explains why he never will. I'll guess McCain agrees with Clinton more than he doesn't---when narrowing the focus to the southern "christian" conservative establishment (which happens to be the powerbloc of the Republican Party).

http://www.tnr.com/031300/grann031300.html
 
Last edited:
I, for one, can't get all worked up over:

Fg Nr and F Hoe Nr

Looks like obscure gasses from the table of elements. But I was always crap at chemistry.
 
Attention Right Wingers!

I believe that it is impossible to negotiate and acomodate fanatics. Those that believe otherwise, are foolish!

Yes, right wingers are quite fanatical. But for the love of (insert your higher power being here) don't cause a World War!

Send that to GWB.
 
I'm rushing out to buy some soap

teddybear4play said:
Politics is dirty.

And BJU was only important because of the issue. Their ban on interracial dating was kinda like the law in Indiana that outlaws bathing in winter — technically on the books, but unenforced. It was quickly repealed once everyone made a fuss about it..

TB4p
So I won't get arrested for taking a bath?
 
Re: I'm rushing out to buy some soap

crappie master said:
So I won't get arrested for taking a bath?
Well, I don't know about you, but I'm not taking the chance.

They're watching you, you know.

Exploiting our national resources simply to clean yourself. How sickening.

:D

TB4p
 
Morwen said:
That's nonsense, that's like equating all of Clinton's policies with the radical left, the stoned out 60s revolutionaries who left bombs under cop cars. Clinton in rhetoric was the campus leftist, Clinton in action was a comfortable centrist.

His inward-looking regime did miss the threat of Islamic terrorists, they could've paid more attention to that, true, but this wasn't complete and total appeasement ala Chamberlain. It was ignorance -- and it was the rabid rightists who allied with Osama in the first place, back in the 80s, in Afghanistan, to counter the Soviet thread. They were ignorant too. Who knew back then that rock-worshipping stone age crazies would ultimately be more dangerous than Kruschev?


ah ya what ever........ What a HOT AV though!!!!!!
 
Back
Top