policywank
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Posts
- 3,239
Nah. You are just engaging in semantics as an excuse to moralize.
To the extent that someone asks why one cheated, temptation and weakness are reasons. Nobody said that they are good reasons or legitimate justification for betrayal. Nor did anybody say that citing those reasons allowed them to justify their behaviour. Most people I know of that cheated due to temptation in a moment of weakness are plagued by guilt and often face substantial consequences for their actions. They know damn well that they shouldn't have done it. But they did. They are human and made a mistake. And they regret it. But if you ask why they did it that is why they did it.
I think that we can all relate to the premise that if you are going to have sex with someone outside your marriage there is, in principal, a "right" way to do it by communicating effectively in advance and either not committing to monogamy in the first place or openly telling your partner that you will no longer be monogamous and give them the opportunity to decide whether to stay or go. But life isn't always that straight forward and sometimes the circumstances are such that your choices are to live in a sexless marriage, end it with catastrophic consequences (for extended family as well) or cheat.
Saying it is never justified is a little like saying violence is never justified. It is never good and we should always seek an alternative. But unless you are intentionally closing your mind we can all imagine scenarios where it is the least bad option. That metaphor is a little strained because sex isn't an immediate need in the same way as say physical protection. But that does lead to an interesting discussion about the role of sex in a marriage. Is it a need like food or water? No, but personally I believe it is part of the commitment so at some point the refusal to have a grown-up sex life is a betrayal of the marital commitment. If one partner does that, why is it incumbent upon the other to absorb the consequences? Why is it ok to betray the marital commitment by denying sex or not having a reasonably grown up sex life when it is not ok to betray the marital commitment by cheating? In my view either neither is ok or both are ok. Not engaging while expecting your partner to remain chaste is every bit as much of a betrayal as cheating, but I am sort of off topic now.
I tend to think that a lot of people who cite the limitations in their marital sex life as their reason to cheat are using that as an excuse. But it is relevant to look deeper at what measures they have taken to address any issues in their marital sex life and just what are the issues to which they are referring. We all have our own preconceptions based upon our own anecdotal experience. But reality runs the full gamut from people who have wildly unrealistic expectations of their partner and use that as cover for their own shitty behaviour to partners who really have frozen out their spouse in the sex department in a way that is a serious violation of the marital contract.
I've told the story before of my friend who's husband cheated. At first she saw the situation as 100% his fault. But digging a little deeper it turned out that they'd had no meaningful sex life for twenty years. There was always some reason but when they string together to be twenty years long something is wrong. He had tried everything to spice things up or seek therapy to no avail. Their relationship was otherwise good. And she wasn't insensitive. But she was the type of woman - and there are many - who felt that if for any reason she isn't in the mood that is reason enough to deny him and any attempt he makes to importune beyond that is intrinsically misogynist. He is a good guy who was genuinely intent on sticking with her no matter what. But he was worn down, feeling unappreciated and gave in to a moment of weakness. He was racked with guilt and confessed almost immediately. I told her at the time that she was as at fault as he was. She had failed to hold up her end of the marital bargain - not because she didn't fuck him whenever he wanted but because she hadn't engaged in their sex life and addressing his needs in good faith. She'd hidden behind feminist tropes to justify taking her husband for granted. That didn't justify his behaviour but it sure put it in context. And it would be entirely inappropriate to go straight to making harsh judgments about lack of respect or honour or all the rest of that moralizing crap without taking a closer look.
Now I'll go one step further. When she first told me about his cheating she was intent on taking him for every penny he was worth and getting sole custody of the kids. In that moment she showed me exactly why he felt trapped enough to stray. As you say he had three bad options: stay in a sexless marriage; face a nasty divorce and potential loss of access to his kids or cheat.
Happily they reconciled. The key point she had to get past was that being a feminist and having a vagina was not license to take him for granted. Sex is not this magical off limits zone where it isn't important to be sensitive to the needs of your partner even when yo are not in the mood. Once she saw that everything took on a whole different feel. He begged for forgiveness and she finally started listening. There were no villains or dishonourable people in this story. Just decent people who made mistakes.