We're supposed to worship "scientists"?

[renard_ruse]

"Scientists" and "academics" are the new priestly caste according to many.

These are the people we're told should get to decide what policies society has to adopt and must never be challenged or questioned on anything:

http://www.peta.org/features/uw-madison-cruelty.aspx

 

[renard_ruse]

They are "liberal" to the extent that it benefits them financially in terms of research grants or gaining support from the ruling elite. If its an issue like torturing defenseless cats, they don't seem all that "liberal."

 

[renard_ruse]

The left wing UW Madison sceince department's treatment of animals...

 

[phrodeau]

You clearly have no head for scientific study. Therefore, if you want an answer to a scientific question, you need to consult scientific advisors.

Most people who influence and decide public policy get lots of advice from the scientific community in order to make informed decisions.

So the big question for you is, how many scientific advisors have you consulted?

 

[kbate]

He's right. We should just look towards Christ when we need healing. Pray to Christ and your diseases, ailments, broken bones and leprosy will simply disappear - there is no need for any of that "Science" stuff that seeks to replace God's will with human knowledge.

 

[Liar]

"Scientists" and "academics" are the new priestly caste according to many.

According to who, for instance?

 

[phrodeau]

According to who, for instance?

Maybe he heard it in church.

 

[Squibbs]

Yes, I heard priests have a new theory on preventing colon cancer in men.

The treatment must be administered while they are pre-pubescent.

 

[Liar]

Maybe he heard it in church.

It's like Invisible Obama all over again. Or vette and AJ telling libs what libs think.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Except Renard can make coherent, if utterly insane, sentences.

 

[Squibbs]

Except Renard can make coherent, if utterly insane, sentences.

His username is quite misleading.

 

[Liar]

Except Renard can make coherent, if utterly insane, sentences.

Hey now. So can Clint Eastwood.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Clint Eastwood needs to figure what team he's on. That early onset dimensia has him pissing off everybody. Poor guy.

 

[kbate]

Clint Eastwood needs to figure what team he's on. That early onset dimensia has him pissing off everybody. Poor guy.

Dimensia? He still appears to be fit and trim for an old guy - plus every movie he touches wins an Oscar, so he's still got something.

 

[neci]

i will stick to worshiping cock.

 

[badbabysitter]

this will defintely be making 2013's Renards greatest hits thread

 

[CandiCame]

Yes, I heard priests have a new theory on preventing colon cancer in men.

The treatment must be administered while they are pre-pubescent.

omfg I'm going to hell for laughing at that. Those were real kids, Candi!

 

[Joeybagadonuts]

"Scientists" and "academics" are the new priestly caste according to many.

These are the people we're told should get to decide what policies society has to adopt and must never be challenged or questioned on anything:

http://www.peta.org/features/uw-madison-cruelty.aspx

yer a funny guy.

 

[KyleW]

Stop using anything brought to you by scientific research.

Stop seeking medical attention from doctors.

Spread this gospel to your kind and let the rest of us humans move on without you.

 

[renard_ruse]

...So the big question for you is, how many scientific advisors have you consulted?

Regarding what, torturing cats?

 

[renard_ruse]

According to who, for instance?

For one, those who say politicians and the public have to accept "scientific consensus" on "climate change" (even though there really isn't a consensus). Anyone who questions them is impuned as "anti-scientist" and is told to "shut up" by the mainstream media.

 

[phrodeau]

For one, those who say politicians and the public have to accept "scientific consensus" on "climate change" (even though there really isn't a consensus). Anyone who questions them is impuned as "anti-scientist" and is told to "shut up" by the mainstream media.

There really is a consensus. Don't listen to the pundits who ignore the scientists.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus

 

[renard_ruse]

this will defintely be making 2013's Renards greatest hits thread

Its a perfectly valid argument and one that you'll be hearing more and more of in the near future.

I see you have no arguments against the valid point made.

 

[cjh]

 

[renard_ruse]

There really is a consensus. Don't listen to the pundits who ignore the scientists.

No, there's not. There's a consensus among certain academics at certain institutions due to political pressures. Its called group think and pressure to conform. Despite this there are many scientists who dare to speak up in opposition.

In fact, global warming is yesterday's news. Its not even happening.