We're all gay

[rgraham666]

Oh, yes you did.

I'd blush but I think I lost that skill in Chicago.

Nothing. I say nothing.

I'm thinking lots though.

 

[Edward Teach]

*Sigh* This could take a while, or do ya think he's playing it this way on purpose?

Ride me till I sweat, Baby. Ride me till I sweat.

 

[Guest]

Ride me till I sweat, Baby. Ride me till I sweat.

Get the riding crop.

Apply vigorously.

 

[lisa123414]

Get the riding crop.

Apply vigorously.

Um, Stella, did you bring the crop?

 

[SeaCat]

LOLOL

Reading the article and the replies reminded me of something Ron White said about guys being at least partially gay.

It was funny and yet it rang so true for so many people I know.

Cat

 

[Lee Chambers]

Note to self:

Post more interesting articles. Enjoy what follows.

 

[ninefe2dg]

The superbowl is gay...

...this kid sez so...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8pxMXiYaNk

 

[Stella_Omega]

Um, Stella, did you bring the crop?

Yes 'm. got it right here.

 

[lisa123414]

Yes 'm. got it right here.

Okay, who gets whipped, me or Teach?

 

[lisa123414]

Nevermind, he's already sweating....

 

[Edward Teach]

Nevermind, he's already sweating....

Or is that drool


.
.
.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Or is that drool


.
.
.

Napkin?

 

[tickledkitty]

Napkin?

Maybe he could just use your cravat?

 

[Stella_Omega]

Maybe he could just use your cravat?

I don't share my cravat with other pirates, even if they do look like Johnny Depp.

 

[tickledkitty]

Edward, do you really look like Johnny Depp?

 

[Edward Teach]

Napkin?

Is it sanitary?

 

[Edward Teach]

Edward, do you really look like Johnny Depp?

No, hon.


I look much better

 

[lisa123414]

No, hon.


I look much better

It's twu! It's twu!

 

[Stella_Omega]

Is it sanitary?

Wadda I look like, a laundry?

 

[The_Fool]

Wadda I look like, a laundry?

Trying to think of a really good and dirty comment to make to this....

 

[CeriseNoire]

Wadda I look like, a laundry?

And yet you still leave things wet

 

[angela146]

I've long felt that "pure" heterosexuality and "pure" homosexuality each represent a disability, i.e. an inability to derive sexual pleasure from one gender or the other.

 

[Stella_Omega]

I've long felt that "pure" heterosexuality and "pure" homosexuality each represent a disability, i.e. an inability to derive sexual pleasure from one gender or the other.

Nicely put

 

[emap]

Oh he is right and wrong.

See the reason he is right is because everyone is attracted to everyone else, just the degree of attraction varies. The reason he is wrong, well sit back this will take a while.

First off, there is no such thing as homosexual, bisexual and heterosexual, toss those things right out. See people are not born one of those, they are born sexual. I guess I should explain that little tidbit.

Sex is not something designed to be only done between a man and a woman or two men two women whatever. Sex is instead designed to be pleasurable, humans are born craving sex, well not really but you get the idea. Before religion said anything for pleasure was bad, people would play with themselves any chance they got, because it was pleasure. Ask a stoner sometime, they get high because it's pleasurable, they do this partly because it also dulls out anything else, and partly because having pleasure naturally is deemed bad. Most stoners at least the ones I have met, are religious. Mostly christian of some sort, though a few other sorts of religion.

Having sex with someone else is hardwired into us, mostly because that is how we got here. Not to mention our brothers or sisters and the neighbors and so forth. We also see it happening, hear it happening and are told about it.

The reason we don't run out and have sex the instant we want to, we are shy at that point, new feelings, changes to our bodies, and society.

Which leads me into the role society plays in the choices on sexual partners. Humans are for the most part very simple, if it feels good they will do it as often as they can. The reason society says sex between a man and a woman is the norm is because that is how we all got here. The Romans and Greeks were alot smarter than people give them credit, they said basically have as much fun as you want, but have kids in the process. Really needed addendum, they tended to be at war with someone all the time so making more Greeks or Romans was needed.

It's not until Jews appeared did anyone say 'hey your not supposed to sleep with someone of the same sex.' Yes the Jews said that first, Christians copied their religion almost word for word and then lessened parts and tightened others to fall into an acceptable medium for Europeans who ate pigs often among many other things.

So without society, well really religion basically the only thing making a person choose one look over another, personal preference. Scientists sorta touch on this one, but I'll lay it out simply. We are all born a man or a woman, sometimes the body does not follow the brain and you end up with a man wanting men or a woman wanting women. The body sometimes gets extra confused and some are born both. Well Ok I think that one is more this person started out twins, one side was absorbed by the other but not totally, which sent out two sets of hormones to create a hermaphrodite.

Now this does not explain everything in personal preference, generally because a man born with a female brain will be into Barbie and not cars. The rest of the personal attraction is influenced and basically hardwired into our brains about the time we are 6 or 7. Not to say anyone into the same sex at that age will never decide they want the opposite sex. No it means we prefer those at that age, our experiences after that determine how much we adhere to said hardwiring. After 6 or 7 our preference is adjusted by our experiences with people, before that it is formed by our parents and society, or rather our parents take on society values.

Now everything really has little value on determining our personal preference on a sexual partner except for one thing, our family. Now in this case I am not talking just our parents, I am talking our parents, their friends, the neighbors, the people you see at the grocery store and so forth.

What determines our sexual preference mostly is who makes us the happiest, so if you have a son and he spends his time with his mother who makes him happy he is 9 times out of 10 going to want women as sexual partner. If the opposite is true he is going to want men as a sexual partner 9 times out of 10.

The reason it is not absolute is because we are simple and complex, we gravitate toward pleasure. However what we find pleasurable varies to a huge degree. I am not kidding there, some only find pleasure alone, some only find pleasure with animals, or blow up dolls, dildo's, causing or receiving pain and so many other things that I would probably crash literotica if I cited them all, assuming I could figure them all out.

This is of course an incredibly simplified version, would take anyone years to get it all set down in a detailed readable manner. Doesn't help much they all build on each other, and overlap, and at times contradict each other.

Hmmm, OK short answer, too late I know I know, people can never be categorized as anything except people. There is nothing alike between us besides the cosmetics, and no I am not talking makeup.

 

[rgraham666]

I've long felt that "pure" heterosexuality and "pure" homosexuality each represent a disability, i.e. an inability to derive sexual pleasure from one gender or the other.

Shrugs. I can live with it. Just one of many disabilities I have.