JazzManJim
On the Downbeat
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2001
- Posts
- 27,360
I was involved in a thread earlier today that got me to doing some thinking.
Here's my situation.
I'm a Christian. I have very definite beliefs. I have no qualms at all sharing those beliefs with others. I do it often and I very much enjoy it. Not only that, I think it's important that I do so.
I don't push where I'm not wanted. I don't begrudge anyone the right to believe whatever they wish. My own belief system says, by definition, that if someone doesn't believe the doctrines I do, then they're wrong. I don't get pushy about that either. In fact, I don't often use the word "wrong" when I talk religion, unless asked to do so.
So why is it that I'm the bastard int he discussion when it happens. No, I don't hold an all-inclusive religious belief. I'm not likely to do so. But don't I have the right to do that without being considered a bad person? Do people who would bash me for that while preaching their own version of inclusiveness indulge in a bit of hyprocrisy when that happens? Why does it seem more acceptable to have an open, free-for-all type of belief system where every belief is valid as opposed to one with more rigid paths? Don't we have room in this world for every belief, even if you don't buy that belief?
Now, mind you, I'm not talking the general stereotype of "Christian". We're talking the brand of religion to which I, and a few others here on the boards subscribe.
Here's my situation.
I'm a Christian. I have very definite beliefs. I have no qualms at all sharing those beliefs with others. I do it often and I very much enjoy it. Not only that, I think it's important that I do so.
I don't push where I'm not wanted. I don't begrudge anyone the right to believe whatever they wish. My own belief system says, by definition, that if someone doesn't believe the doctrines I do, then they're wrong. I don't get pushy about that either. In fact, I don't often use the word "wrong" when I talk religion, unless asked to do so.
So why is it that I'm the bastard int he discussion when it happens. No, I don't hold an all-inclusive religious belief. I'm not likely to do so. But don't I have the right to do that without being considered a bad person? Do people who would bash me for that while preaching their own version of inclusiveness indulge in a bit of hyprocrisy when that happens? Why does it seem more acceptable to have an open, free-for-all type of belief system where every belief is valid as opposed to one with more rigid paths? Don't we have room in this world for every belief, even if you don't buy that belief?
Now, mind you, I'm not talking the general stereotype of "Christian". We're talking the brand of religion to which I, and a few others here on the boards subscribe.