Well I'm shocked for one.

ABSTRUSE

Cirque du Freak
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
50,094
Report Shows Big Drop in Reading in U.S.


By HILLEL ITALIE, AP National Writer

NEW YORK - The reading of books is on the decline in America, despite Harry Potter (news - web sites) and the best efforts of Oprah Winfrey. A report released Thursday by the National Endowment for the Arts says the number of non-reading adults increased by more than 17 million between 1992 and 2002.



Only 47 percent of American adults read "literature" (poems, plays, narrative fiction) in 2002, a drop of 7 points from a decade earlier. Those reading any book at all in 2002 fell to 57 percent, down from 61 percent.


NEA chairman Dana Gioia, himself a poet, called the findings shocking and a reason for grave concern.


"We have a lot of functionally literate people who are no longer engaged readers," Gioia said in an interview with The Associated Press. "This isn't a case of `Johnny Can't Read,' but `Johnny Won't Read.'"


The likely culprits, according to the report: television, movies and the Internet.


"I think what we're seeing is an enormous cultural shift from print media to electronic media, and the unintended consequences of that shift," Gioia said.


The decline came despite the creation of Oprah's book club in 1996 and the Harry Potter craze that began in the late 1990s among kids and adults alike. Reading fell even as Barnes & Noble boasted that its superstore empire was expanding the book market.


In 1992, 72.6 million adults in the United States did not read a book. By 2002, that figure had increased to 89.9 million, the NEA said.


"Whenever I hear about something like this, I think of it as a call to arms," said Mitchell Kaplan, president of the American Booksellers Association. "As booksellers, we need to look into what kinds of partnerships we can get into to encourage literacy and the immediacy of the literary experience."


In May, the nonprofit Book Industry Study Group reported that the number of books purchased in the United States in 2003 fell by 23 million from the year before to 2.22 billion.


The NEA study, titled "Reading at Risk," was based on a Census Bureau (news - web sites) survey of more than 17,000 adults.


The drop in reading was widespread: among men and women, young and old, black and white, college graduates and high school dropouts. The numbers were especially poor among adult men, of whom only 38 percent read literature, and Hispanics overall, for whom the percentage was 26.5.


The decline was especially great among the youngest people surveyed, ages 18 to 24. Only 43 percent had read any literature in 2002, down from 53 percent in 1992.


Gioia said the electronic media that are contributing to the problem do offer possible remedies. He praised Winfrey's use of television to promote literacy and said he wished for a "thousand variants" of the idea.


"There's a communal aspect to reading that has collapsed and we need to find ways to restore it," Gioia said.


The title "Reading at Risk" is modeled on "A Nation at Risk," a 1983 government study that warned of a "rising tide of mediocrity in elementary and secondary schools" and led to numerous reforms. But Gioia avoided specific proposals in the NEA report.


"I don't believe the NEA should tell the culture what to do," he said. "The reason we are bringing this study out is that we consider it a crisis situation that requires a national conversation."
 
I'm not completely surprised. It does seem that I see less and less people reading than I used to.

I can't imagine a life without books. I buy them constantly (2 just yesterday), and read them so fast that my budget can't keep up with my need.

My husband, on the other hand, will read if there is absolutely nothing else he can find to do. It's a first choice for me, but his last. I don't understand it.
 
im surprised, really.
its a huge push here at the schools to have the kids read, but in this household we read like its the air we breathe.

i wonder just how flawed that article is.. or for that matter the information that is its basis. ive never been a believer in the census bureau.. their data collecting leaves much to be desired.

but behind some of this might just be some truth... as hard as it is for some of us to imagine.
*sigh*
 
I have to wonder also. Schools here also have reading programs where the kids have to read certain books to acquire points.

I came from a reading family also and I try to get my children to read more.
Most of the people I know are readers.

It does make you wonder about the accuracy of the article.
 
ABSTRUSE said:
I have to wonder also. Schools here also have reading programs where the kids have to read certain books to acquire points.

I came from a reading family also and I try to get my children to read more.
Most of the people I know are readers.

It does make you wonder about the accuracy of the article.

Most of the people I know don't read much. Of course, much is in the eye of the beholder. Before I found Lit (the time-sucking black hole) I would go through 2-3 novels a day on a good Saturday. :rolleyes: Damned expensive habit, that.
 
I'm not surprised. As a professor, I got to see just how many students absolutely hated reading. At the same time, though, I'm amazed, because I simply can't imagine not wanting to read, anything and everything. If my brain is not otherwise occupied, I need something to read so I won't go crazy. I have never understood people who hate to read/won't do it.

I'd kinda like to know where the hatred of reading comes from, though. I'm not sure where my love of reading comes from, to be honest. I don't even remember learning how to read. It's like...one day, I magically was able to make sense of the funny little symbols.

Anyway, enough of my early-morning barely-coherent babble!

~M:rose:
 
I've always love to read, to go into the world where created characters from someone else's imagination live and breath was always enthralling for me.

I'm like you Mhari, once those little symbols made sense, I had to find out more.
 
ABSTRUSE said:
I've always love to read, to go into the world where created characters from someone else's imagination live and breath was always enthralling for me.

I'm like you Mhari, once those little symbols made sense, I had to find out more.

I don't normally feel the need to 'me, too' something, but I'm with you on this one. I absolutely cannot comprehend anyone not wanting to read. Like Mhari, I can't remember actually learning to read, in fact I can't remember not being able to read. My earliest memory is from about four years old. If a day goes by without my reading something I must be ill!

Alex
 
Alex De Kok said:
I don't normally feel the need to 'me, too' something, but I'm with you on this one. I absolutely cannot comprehend anyone not wanting to read. Like Mhari, I can't remember actually learning to read, in fact I can't remember not being able to read. My earliest memory is from about four years old. If a day goes by without my reading something I must be ill!

Alex

I do remember learning to read. Comic books. My father started buying me comic books before I could read. Having a male child gave him an excuse to buy them for himself.
Comic books tell their stories on three levels; pictures, dialog and narration. Stepping up each level, I learned to read. When the other kids were wrestling with Dick and Jane, I already knew words like nefarious and invulnerable.
They don't seem to make comic books for children anymore.
I remember that the teachers were always giving me books that were supposed to be good for me, while my dad was giving me Huck Finn and Sherlock Holmes and Tarzan and the Queen of Opar. He taught me to love to read. Then he gave me Cyrano De Begerac and I was enslaved.
Reading can be a full meal or a treat. But you have got to develop a taste.

:rose:
 
Last edited:
Possible flaw in that study: we have here a community that reads on the internet. What media is that?

Yet I find the conclusions to be disturbingly likely. The only way to combat it on a grass roots level is to encourage reading. With that in mind, I intend to advertise myself to every attractive lady of legal age that I meet today. :cool:
 
Belegon said:
I intend to advertise myself to every attractive lady of legal age that I meet today. :cool:

I love the way your mind works! :kiss:
 
I personally love to read and don't get nearly as much free time to do it as I would like. But that being said, the results of the study don't surprise me in the least.

Sure schools push reading but I doubt how effective their campaigns really are. From what I have seen kids spend far too much time in front of the TV (watching or playing games) or computers.

Want proof of what americans are really doing? Go into Wal-Mart and compare the DVD/Video game section with the book section. The DVD/Video section is about 500% larger. And half the book section is taken up by magazines.

Yes, I know, there are other book stores and libraries. But I think the Wal-Mart gives a pretty good representation of what the unwashed masses in America are really doing.

Personally I can't stand the store, but they do make money, why? Because they know what most Americans really want. And apparently it's not books.
 
On the other hand the report seems to be about novels or at least full length books. So the figures don't really surprise me. If newspapers, comicbooks, magazines and the net were included I'd guess the figures would be a lot higher, but these obviously aren't 'worthy' reading material.

Add to that the fact that any generation born after the 60s had their entertainment handed to them on a plate via tv, movies and the net and you can see why they came up with these figures.

To quote a couple of things from somewhere or other:

"I read a book once but didn't like it, so I've never bothered since."

and from a TV interview of a 'man in the street' at the exit from the 'Millenium Dome Exhibition'.
"Its just full of educational stuff and I did all that at school, I don't want to do that now."

Gauche
 
One of these days I'm going to learn to read. I blame my parents.

(Typing random letters in the hope that they'll form real words can be soul-destroying. Maybe I'll become a compulsive neologist.)
 
As a bookseller I know that my customers are in a minority in the local population. That's why my business doesn't make money. (It is a retirement hobby)

I am encouraged by the few children who come in to buy books for themselves but they are a few.

Even more depressing for me is the poor circulation of the local papers. So many things in every issue that affect people - and they don't read the paper so they don't know.

'Who agreed that we should pay more for parking our car?" - The campaign against the increase has been running for a year yet most residents don't know until the new charge hits them.

Why are all the toilets closed? Thousands of leaflets distributed, reports in most issues of the local papers but it only gets on the radio when the toilets actually close.

Our local council has masses on its internet site. Hit rates are depressingly low. My worst rated story has more hits than a couple of dozen pages of the council's site.

The councillors and officials despair. How can they raise their profile and get people involved if everything they try to do IS NOT READ? Even holding public meetings is a waste of time. You have to read a notice to see that the meeting is scheduled.

Yet I go back 50 years, 100 years in the local paper. The same things were being said then - people don't read yet more books and more information is published every year than any previous year in the world's history.

We do have readers. We have people who don't read. How we turn people into readers? I don't know and my business depends on it. Sometimes, just sometimes it happens. I sell books on the pavement at ten pence each. Once or twice someone who doesn't normally read can't resist a ten pence bargain and then becomes a customer. It has happened about five times in nine years.

Og
 
I too am not even surprized. I live in a city of readers with great independent bookstores, and the other kind too. I once had a discussion of Lolita with a young salesclerk at Macy's whilst buying socks. I take the bus everyday and at least 50% of the passengers have a book to read. The cafes I frequent (not Starbucks) are filled with people reading or writing. My 12-year old niece was a voracious reader long bfore Harry Potter entered the scene (credit that to genes, not SF ;) ). My three brothers are all great readers (credit my father).

But I know all that is not the norm. Others have said it - blame video, e-games and the web.

Perdita
 
perdita said:
I too am not even surprized. I live in a city of readers with great independent bookstores, and the other kind too. I once had a discussion of Lolita with a young salesclerk at Macy's whilst buying socks. I take the bus everyday and at least 50% of the passengers have a book to read. The cafes I frequent (not Starbucks) are filled with people reading or writing. My 12-year old niece was a voracious reader long bfore Harry Potter entered the scene (credit that to genes, not SF ;) ). My three brothers are all great readers (credit my father).

But I know all that is not the norm. Others have said it - blame video, e-games and the web.

Perdita

That reminds me of when I met an 11 yr old boy who read Sartre's "No Exit" and told me how he would love to perform it on stage someday. He was a very sweet and unpretentious kid, but his mom wouldn't let me adopt him.
 
This has been going on for a long time.

When I was a kid, TV and movies were no where near as common as they are now. Personal computers and the Internet did not exist. And the number of people who read, as I recall, was not greatly different from today.

I was one of very few who did much reading. In fact, the first time I got punished in school was for reading a Grade 8 science textbook instead of 'Look Jane, look. See Spot run!"

Plus the assorted shit kickings I got for being 'a brain'.

Reading, in my opinion, has never been especially encouraged. We're supposed to read and write well enough to read and fill in official communications and that's it.

Anything else will upset The Gravy Train's Ride To The Sea.

People who do a lot of reading have imagination and knowledge. They make poor producing/consuming economic entities.
 
I'm really surprised. Everytime I go to the bookstore, which is quite often, there seems to be a good crowd looking through books and purchasing. Even friends, family and co-workers seem to comment more on the books they read and how much they enjoy it. Alot of people I notice sit around the pool this time of year with a book.
 
Lord DragonsWing said:
I'm really surprised. Everytime I go to the bookstore, which is quite often, there seems to be a good crowd looking through books and purchasing. Even friends, family and co-workers seem to comment more on the books they read and how much they enjoy it. Alot of people I notice sit around the pool this time of year with a book.

You hang with a good crowd.
I was at the laundrymat yesterday and saw a dozen people sit and stare into space for an hour and a half. What a waste of reading time!
:rose:
 
I'm not sure about all the other aspects of this, though I do agree those statistics are alarming. Perhaps one way to help change things is push reading on the net. I found a site, its mostly older sci-fi which I occasionally read, heck I read anything, but it has free downloads and stuff. Only problem for me is printing out a 2 or 300 page book since I like to read myself to sleep. Look at it and if it comes up, point someone else in that direction. Its baen.com/library/ or just google search Baen books.
 
The Mutt said:
You hang with a good crowd.
I was at the laundrymat yesterday and saw a dozen people sit and stare into space for an hour and a half. What a waste of reading time!
:rose:

I don't know if it's a good crowd. They just come to the pool and bury themselves in the books while taking a break from the kids who are splashing me all the time.
 
I'm with Gauche on this. Comic books are underrated. Sure a lot of them are drivel, but anything which goes toward making reading fun, makes reading a thing to do for fun. It ought to be a no-brainer, but there was a "reading is threatened" call to arms in the fifties in America with the theme that comic books were bad.

So I daresay the study doesn't care about periodicals or children's books and wants to know about lit, history, and whatnot, only.

cantdog

ps comics were bad in the '50s

c
 
upfront said:
One of these days I'm going to learn to read. I blame my parents.

(Typing random letters in the hope that they'll form real words can be soul-destroying. Maybe I'll become a compulsive neologist.)

Only trouble with doing that uppy - no one reads them as you have intended them to be read. - (heads up asses);)
 
I cant say im really surprised. Technology has taken over everything, which includes literature. Im not as big a book reader as i used to be, but i DO read a lot on the puter. Also, I am more of a Biography person.If i read a book, i like to read about history, or a persons life.
also, computers have taken over everything, and this includes a kids time that used to be spent reading. My wife loves reading, and hopefully our kids will follow suit. However, nowadays, most kids spend their free time on the puter, or gaming systems. I am starting to have a problem with the "progress" our worls is making, because it seems that we are regressing educationally. The smarter everything else is becoming,i.e. computers, house hold appliances, and supplies, office equipment, the worse off humans are becoming.
Starts to make you think that Terminator isnt just a movie. Machines and computers ARE taking over!!
 
Back
Top