Weird hypothetical question

It gets lost to the atmosphere. Cooling towers are so energy efficient that the expense of the water is worth it, even when it can't be recaptured.

Which is "always," when it comes to cooling towers. Re-condensing it for recapture is the opposite of efficient.

Energy wise, anyway. Obviously it would be more water efficient, but again, relative costs make it inefficient, money wise.

Expense, energy, and material: This is one of those "pick two out of three" situations you can optimize for.

This is all part of why Musk is interested in building data centers in orbit.

Even if he were to set up a small one just for a Grock processor, it would get 24 hour unobstructed solar power, constant radiative cooling and would be untouchable.
 
This is all part of why Musk is interested in building data centers in orbit.

Even if he were to set up a small one just for a Grock processor, it would get 24 hour unobstructed solar power, constant radiative cooling and would be untouchable.
Yeah, but imagine how hard it would be to get the vendor to send a tech on-site to replace a faulty bit of hardware!
 
Yeah, but imagine how hard it would be to get the vendor to send a tech on-site to replace a faulty bit of hardware!

I know that Blue Origin (Or something like that... Bezo's space hobby) wants to create tourism and space travel for citizens because he thinks it's the next logical thing for fast travel. Which makes sense, cause a rocket will get us around the globe much faster than an airplane.

My point being, I think if they ever get the costs of space travel low enough, it will be fairly easy to get a tech person to floating data centers.

But it is a bit absurd to think about when there's starving humans down below. Maybe we can genetically modify corn and potatos to grow in space and manufacture some space robot farmers first. Not sure how it would be profitable, just spitballing.
 
Back
Top