Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Biofire says its gun will be in people's hands this month. The company has walked a careful line to avoid blowback from the gun-rights movement.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/biofire-smart-gun-biometric-safety-rcna143637
Finally got some time to read your article. Overall, I’m inclined to support this but I have many questions. These questions don’t matter for this comment that you posted here lifts a lot of heavy weight - if the gun nuts are already arguing that the government can possibly disable this weapon through electronic impulses and are complaining on its limited capacity then I would warn Biofire that it faces a fate similar to the previous, now bankrupt, company that attempted this. You can’t stop technological advances - military use of this probably needs to come first before the American consumer gets on board.
 
Okay smart one. I already provided the info and links for you. I’ll allow that you didn’t read my post before you posted your last kernel of stupidity. Let’s see if you can grasp it when I spoon feed you:

In order to do such a thing, one must first obtain a spoon.

AlexBailey said:

In CA you can’t buy a gun until 21. Then you can get anything that is legal.

This, like most of your "facts" is a half truth at best. In Ca, you can only buy guns which are "not unsafe" as determined by the State. There are thousands of "legal" guns out there but unless the State has deemed them "not unsafe" you cannot obtain them.

Further, you cannot obtain "precursor parts" for a gun without first getting a State issued serial number for those "precursor parts." A "precursor part" is ANYTHING which can readily and easily be made into a firearm.

There are youboob vids of a guy making an SKS receiver out of a shovel. Under California's "precursor parts" law, this means you cannot buy a SHOVEL without first getting Cal DOJ approval and a serial number. The same applies to blocks of aluminum and steel. 3D printers might also be covered as would printing spools.

ALL of those things are "legal" but you cannot get them unless you break the law. A law almost no one obeys because it's STUPID!

So, as usual, your "facts" aren't really facts they're half truths at best. And moronic ones at that.

Which also means you still need to find a spoon.
 
This, like most of your "facts" is a half truth at best. In Ca, you can only buy guns which are "not unsafe" as determined by the State. There are thousands of "legal" guns out there but unless the State has deemed them "not unsafe" you cannot obtain them.

Further, you cannot obtain "precursor parts" for a gun without first getting a State issued serial number for those "precursor parts." A "precursor part" is ANYTHING which can readily and easily be made into a firearm.

There are youboob vids of a guy making an SKS receiver out of a shovel. Under California's "precursor parts" law, this means you cannot buy a SHOVEL without first getting Cal DOJ approval and a serial number. The same applies to blocks of aluminum and steel. 3D printers might also be covered as would printing spools.

ALL of those things are "legal" but you cannot get them unless you break the law. A law almost no one obeys because it's STUPID!

So, as usual, your "facts" aren't really facts they're half truths at best. And moronic ones at that.

Which also means you still need to find a spoon.
You sure took a lot of words to agree with what Alex wrote in one simple sentence...."get anything that is legal".

An unsafe gun is not legal,now is it?
 
You sure took a lot of words to agree with what Alex wrote in one simple sentence...."get anything that is legal".

An unsafe gun is not legal,now is it?
Define "unsafe gun". The legal folk want the narrative that if someone can get killed then something is inherently defective.

You can thank Ralf Nader for this.

I would define "inherently unsafe" as like my AMT Automag. The pistol was under engineered for a very powerful wildcat cartridge. It wasn't prone to blowing up in your face like a 1567 blunderbuss

Unsafe would be like a Raven in .25. prone to breaking, .25 is just about powerful enough to kill a cat. We shot one at a refrigerator and hit it 2 times out of 50 at 10 feet

An early colt dragoon that would misfire or fire from half cock, fire with the cylinder out of index
 
In order to do such a thing, one must first obtain a spoon.



This, like most of your "facts" is a half truth at best. In Ca, you can only buy guns which are "not unsafe" as determined by the State. There are thousands of "legal" guns out there but unless the State has deemed them "not unsafe" you cannot obtain them.

Further, you cannot obtain "precursor parts" for a gun without first getting a State issued serial number for those "precursor parts." A "precursor part" is ANYTHING which can readily and easily be made into a firearm.

There are youboob vids of a guy making an SKS receiver out of a shovel. Under California's "precursor parts" law, this means you cannot buy a SHOVEL without first getting Cal DOJ approval and a serial number. The same applies to blocks of aluminum and steel. 3D printers might also be covered as would printing spools.

ALL of those things are "legal" but you cannot get them unless you break the law. A law almost no one obeys because it's STUPID!

So, as usual, your "facts" aren't really facts they're half truths at best. And moronic ones at that.

Which also means you still need to find a spoon.

You whiny little pud. You got me. I didn’t list every nuance of the laws for California or Russia in my short description.

Go slap your tiny knob and tell yourself what a genius you are.
 
You whiny little pud. You got me. I didn’t list every nuance of the laws for California or Russia in my short description.

Go slap your tiny knob and tell yourself what a genius you are.

This is what not actually having any "facts" despite LOUDLY saying otherwise gets you.
 
Ask HisArpy.

You'll have to ask the good folks at the California Dept of Justice for their official definition. All I know is that unless they deem it "not unsafe" (their rules and title) then it's not "not unsafe." Presumably that makes it unsafe but that's not actually clear.
 
You'll have to ask the good folks at the California Dept of Justice for their official definition. All I know is that unless they deem it "not unsafe" (their rules and title) then it's not "not unsafe." Presumably that makes it unsafe but that's not actually clear.
Well I figured since you brought it up, you'd know the answer. Guess I was wrong.
 
Picked up the rest of the stuff for the rifles stock refinishing project. It will (likely) be reassembled tomorrow. Trip Out West and test it all out next weekend.


w000t!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top