Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread

[Lazaran]

Mr. Crumbley goes to prison.

That ^ is all…

 

[AlexBailey]

Why would I think he was any more than a self-absorbed delusional idiot?

Oh good. I’m glad tto know you aren’t one of the nut jobs thinking about a 2a solution to right wing political woes.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

In the present case it is a little inaccurate to say I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible to any public office of trust or profit in the Republic. But I do not repine, for I am a subject of it only by force of arms.

~ H.L. Mencken

 

[Bn2f]

Oh good. I’m glad tto know you aren’t one of the nut jobs thinking about a 2a solution to right wing political woes.

AB? How are you? I have to admit to you that I’ve not been able to read your two latest submissions. I’ve been kind of busy. I will do so tonight. I promise. Hold off on passing early kind judgment on this one here (wat). I know you posted on political threats before, but I don’t know if you’ve been here before. Howdy and welcome. This particular thread is about advocating for gun reform. I’m glad to see you here! Post more against this insane fantasy of an armed citizen being able to overthrow a tyranny that seems to actually be white male grievance.

 

[coati]

Show me specifically where your comment has any merit in what the Founding Fathers said or meant.

Hitch, you missed the point about MAGAts who talk about arming themselves to overthrow tyranny when their actual agenda is to overturn elections after they lose.

However, you may not understand the difference between democracy and autocracy, so we'll have to take that into consideration.

 

[wizzard426]

Hitch, you missed the point about MAGAts who talk about arming themselves to overthrow tyranny when their actual agenda is to overturn elections after they lose.

However, you may not understand the difference between democracy and autocracy, so we'll have to take that into consideration.

more importantly is that we understand the difference between "dim0crazy" and a constitutional republic.

Funny though how every time you dims lose at democracy you cry to a court to protect you. Why is that?

 

[Wat_Tyler]

According to the NAGR, 18 other states have "dogpiled" onto their suit against the Ct Sturmgewehr ban.


Why does Fearful Ignorance lead to such a contorting of the view of Reality and a hardening of the Logic? Children, hold your faces to the light even though for the moment you do not see.


The happiness we seek, a genuine lasting peace and happiness, can be attained only through the purification of our minds. This is possible if we cut the root cause of all suffering and misery—our fundamental ignorance.

~ His Holiness the Dalai Lama

 

[Wat_Tyler]

Because Allah fucking forbid that elected cunts actually have a motherfucking clue what they're talking about:

 

[Wat_Tyler]

And your Friday morning reminder of what happen when "gummints guns good your guns bad" prevails:


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/Men_with_an_unidentified_unit_execute_a_group_of_Soviet_civilians_kneeling_by_the_side_of_a_mass_grave.jpg/800px-Men_with_an_unidentified_unit_execute_a_group_of_Soviet_civilians_kneeling_by_the_side_of_a_mass_grave.jpg

 

[Wat_Tyler]

Whatever it takes.


Translation: By Any Means Necessary.

Because like this gummint cunt, they smile when they whack you:


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/60/Einsatzgruppen_or_their_auxiliaries_-_Kovno_1942.jpg/800px-Einsatzgruppen_or_their_auxiliaries_-_Kovno_1942.jpg

 

[Bn2f]

And your Friday morning reminder of what happen when "gummints guns good your guns bad" prevails:


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/Men_with_an_unidentified_unit_execute_a_group_of_Soviet_civilians_kneeling_by_the_side_of_a_mass_grave.jpg/800px-Men_with_an_unidentified_unit_execute_a_group_of_Soviet_civilians_kneeling_by_the_side_of_a_mass_grave.jpg

Your posts do not fool me.
You see the atrocities of history on the innocent as porn.
You disgust me.

 

[Bn2f]

more importantly is that we understand the difference between "dim0crazy" and a constitutional republic.

Funny though how every time you dims lose at democracy you cry to a court to protect you. Why is that?

I made an error with you that I would like to go back and fix. I made a comment about you without directly linking. I apologize for that. Please allow me to address my point again here…

 

[Bn2f]

Funny though how every time you dims lose at democracy you cry to a court to protect you. Why is that?

Please allow me to address my point again here…

Imagine, if you will, being a member since 06 and leading a peaceful existence on a sex site trying to get your personal freak on without anyone caring or judging, nay, even being encouraged to be the you that you always wanted to be:

wizzard426:

“Hi.

I have been peeking into the window at you hotties for too long I've realized and never introduced myself.

53 WM 5'9" slim girly waist part time slut (bi). I've done a little play over the years on both sides of the fence (twice getting bent over the fence with one of those in panties)

I can't sing or dance but I can tell jokes and stories with a rimming thrown in from time to time.

If nothing else, I gotta thank you folks. I caught the eye of an aspiring young sissy too afraid to by her own panties. This sight helps to keep me from looking like a clueless old man with me maybe getting a boy toy to boot.

Better than the Easter bunny!”


…and then, in a matter of days, waste all that to out yourself to the world truly as a POS.

Now look, wizzard, you and TH can cry that I’m berating your sexuality. I am not. I have never, but I AM a progressive liberal socialist who has no problem and think it is my duty to mock self hating, tap dancing blacks (hello? Tim Scott? Thomas?) as well as Log Cabin dipshits (I’m looking again at you Tim Scott!***) who advocate positions hurting those already maligned minorities that they themselves are a part of.

(***Bn2f would very much like to clarify that this is simply angry conjecture on their part rooted in the fact that their 2 state senators have frequently misrepresented themselves and their state and that you are witnessing a long held belief of theirs relating to both senators EVEN BEFORE Graham attached his lips to trump’s ass or Scott declaring his, um, engagement.)

 

[coati]

more importantly is that we understand the difference between "dim0crazy" and a constitutional republic.

Funny though how every time you dims lose at democracy you cry to a court to protect you. Why is that?

Democrats understand that basic human rights are best enforced at the federal level, like the right not to be enslaved. The American Civil War established that certain aspects of governance were not delegated to individual states.

Now women (a majority group in America) are insisting that their reproductive rights need a reasonable degree of federal protection, as opposed to having religious fanatics in certain states enslave them into being handmaidens. Gay and trans people are seeking federal protecting for their right to exist and pursue happiness, as opposed to being marginalized in certain states. Ethnic and racial minorities are insisting on basic representation rights, as opposed to being gerrymandered out of power in certain states. And, the majority of all Americans are insisting that election results be accepted after court appeals are resolved, as opposed to violently interfering with the transfer of power and fraudulently establishing fake electors in certain states.

So, yes, Democrats understand that certain rights in our republic are reserved for the individual states, but basic human rights fall under the purview of the federal government. It's a democratic republic that strives to ensure basic human rights.

If you don't like that system, try pulling a J6 and write to us from prison, punk.

 

[Bn2f]

And your Friday morning reminder of what happen when "gummints guns good your guns bad" prevails:


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/Men_with_an_unidentified_unit_execute_a_group_of_Soviet_civilians_kneeling_by_the_side_of_a_mass_grave.jpg/800px-Men_with_an_unidentified_unit_execute_a_group_of_Soviet_civilians_kneeling_by_the_side_of_a_mass_grave.jpg

Explain this please.

Trump supporter charged with firing gun during Jan. 6 attack ordered detained

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna143217

 

[Bn2f]

Democrats understand that basic human rights are best enforced at the federal level, like the right not to be enslaved. The American Civil War established that certain aspects of governance were not delegated to individual states.

Now women (a majority group in America) are insisting that their reproductive rights need a reasonable degree of federal protection, as opposed to having religious fanatics in certain states enslave them into being handmaidens. Gay and trans people are seeking federal protecting for their right to exist and pursue happiness, as opposed to being marginalized in certain states. Ethnic and racial minorities are insisting on basic representation rights, as opposed to being gerrymandered out of power in certain states. And, the majority of all Americans are insisting that election results be accepted after court appeals are resolved, as opposed to violently interfering with the transfer of power and fraudulently establishing fake electors in certain states.

So, yes, Democrats understand that certain rights in our republic are reserved for the individual states, but basic human rights fall under the purview of the federal government. It's a democratic republic that strives to ensure basic human rights.

If you don't like that system, try pulling a J6 and write to us from prison, punk.

Hey coati, how are you? Hope all is well with you and your health and you and your gf have plans for an enjoyable weekend.
Allow me to piggyback on your post to say that our democracy is designed with 3 branches (who knew? amirite? ) and for someone to take issue with remedy from the Judicial branch is just dumb. It's continually frustrating that before we can get to addressing many of the issues you previously described, as well as gun violence, we must first take 3 steps backwards and give civic lessons to those claiming to be "We The People" patriots.

 

[AlexBailey]

more importantly is that we understand the difference between "dim0crazy" and a constitutional republic.

Funny though how every time you dims lose at democracy you cry to a court to protect you. Why is that?

So you ignore every aspect of the Constitution besides the 2a?

 

[coati]

The real theme of this thread is "Cowardly punks bragging about their guns"

 

[TrailerHitch]

Sorry. The lightly veiled sarcasm must have gone over your head.

I really am a gun enthusiast. I own several. I’ve fired over 300 rounds of 9mm in the last two weeks.

The gun I always wished I could have for fun target shooting is this little 22Lr belt-feed replica of a Browning 30.

I read about it in Rifleman years ago and almost wished I lived in Indiana.

I don't believe you. Because frankly you talk out of both sides of your ass on this topic.

 

[contrifan32]

Because Allah fucking forbid that elected cunts actually have a motherfucking clue what they're talking about:

Thank you, that was most entertaining.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

I don't believe you. Because frankly you talk out of both sides of your ass on this topic.

and you don't........lmfao

 

[LLCox]

So cool. I want to do it.

 

[wizzard426]

Democrats understand that basic human rights are best enforced at the federal level, like the right not to be enslaved.

Ahahahahahahahahahahaha !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Must be just a little young to remember "Occupy Wall Street"....................Protip: It wasn't Wall Street the washed away the occupation!

 

[AlexBailey]

I don't believe you. Because frankly you talk out of both sides of your ass on this topic.

Actually, does it elude you that there are more than two sides to this issue?

I own and have an appreciation for guns for many reasons, but I also believe in the need for many gun control measures.

Any thinking person will have some understanding for the need of some gun control laws. Keep in mind that the 2a does not mention ‘firearms’ - only arms, yet many weapons are reasonably regulated.

Do you believe civilians should have legal access to grenades and grenade launchers? How about vehicle mounted machine guns? Those are rights to bear arms that are infringed. Do you honestly believe those controls are unconstitutional? If not you already have some belief in arms control.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/43/fc/5c/43fc5c264043b39c27ffe2349b5ce1a9.jpg


It never does . . . unless it does . . . .


https://fakehistoryhunter.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/wonder20if20it20is20in20france.jpg?w=550