Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, as long as "they" leave Allah in Ramadan.


S&W is having a big open house at their new facility in October. Pretty sure I have plans that day.
 
Leaving Mass was good enough for one Lit jeenyus . . . . :rolleyes:


They could ditch the unions, too, I reckon.
Undoubtedly, but any of the truly skilled folks that make the move will suffer no ill consequence financially.

The plant is all new with CNC machinery utilizing SPC and SQC techniques which should translate into higher quality products. Very much like the products being turned out at Remington's new plant in Hunstville, AL.

So far I've shot 5 off the shelf Remington 1911R1's made in Huntsville and everyone shot as well as an accurized Colt.
 
Wat is a CNC fan. Those heads on the big HfD, among other things, made it snort. Nice thing is, they can match it over and over.


My only gripe about my 19 is a wee blem in the finish. It'll earn a few more, so WTF?
 
As long as it shoots straight and you tell the truth all is good

The "progressives" are getting desperate out there.
 
It shoots just fine, TYVM, and it ain't fer sale.


Which reminds me, I may try some cold blue on a couple of old wrenches that I de-rusted. Evaporust does work. Some finish on them would be nice.
 
Now that teh Jacksonville shooter has popularized drawing swatstikas on the barrels of rifles, I wonder who will be first to modify their arsenal to show off their stylishness at teh range: Wat or Chobham?
 
Now that teh Jacksonville shooter has popularized drawing swatstikas on the barrels of rifles, I wonder who will be first to modify their arsenal to show off their stylishness at teh range: Wat or Chobham?
Neither, Hitler was a left winger. So, probably something we'd find on your Nerf Super Soaker.
 
Neither, Hitler was a left winger. So, probably something we'd find on your Nerf Super Soaker.
Hitler initially claimed to be a left winger (which conservatives at the time thought was infinitely better than "Communist"), but embraced fascism throughout most of his career. Trump has the same arc.

Swatstikas continue to be embraced by the fringe right wing of the MAGA party.
 
Hitler initially claimed to be a left winger (which conservatives at the time thought was infinitely better than "Communist"), but embraced fascism throughout most of his career. Trump has the same arc.
That's a lie. Trump has never embraced corporatism which is the fascist use of corporations to compel illegal totalitarian government policy. This is what the Democrats have done since taking the White House.
Swatstikas continue to be embraced by the fringe right wing of the MAGA party.
Italian Fascism emphasized nationalism, corporatism, totalitarianism, and militarism. The doctrinal principle envisioned the State as all-embracing and beyond it no human or spiritual value exists. But a close examination of the two reveals the difference being that Italian Fascism did not contemplate a racial component. Nazism however did contemplate "Aryanism" as a most important racial component.

So when we observe your party, the Democrat Party, aspects of both totalitarian systems at work in the Government come into view. The love of the state as all-embracing with little human or spiritual value existing beyond it, the utilization of corporatism to advance state goals that are denied to the government by the Constitution, the organized disparagement of one race over others, and all the while advancing a Socialist spending agenda.
 
Nazism however did contemplate "Aryanism" as a most important racial component.
God you're stupid...the NAZI's core component was anti Semitism. There were troubles due to the depression and Hitler blamed it all on the Jews...Aryanism didn't come about until he wanted to expunge populations from places like Austria.
 
Is there a tuning fork for that sort of thing?

A knob to twist up by the muzzle?

Will you need a C-note or two, or three, ...?
 
"People who advocate restricting gun ownership cite polls showing support for tighter firearms laws, but they're slow to point to evidence of support for owning the means of self-defense. For example, a majority of respondents in a recent poll say it's too easy to get a gun, but those who own them say having one makes them feel safer, and many non-owners are open to acquiring firearms. Further complicating matters for anti-gunners is that Americans overwhelmingly see threats to their safety in the government officials who enforce restrictive laws."

https://reason.com/2023/08/30/polls-offer-little-comfort-for-supporters-of-gun-control/

[Libertarian]
 
"People who advocate restricting gun ownership cite polls showing support for tighter firearms laws, but they're slow to point to evidence of support for owning the means of self-defense. For example, a majority of respondents in a recent poll say it's too easy to get a gun, but those who own them say having one makes them feel safer, and many non-owners are open to acquiring firearms. Further complicating matters for anti-gunners is that Americans overwhelmingly see threats to their safety in the government officials who enforce restrictive laws."

https://reason.com/2023/08/30/polls-offer-little-comfort-for-supporters-of-gun-control/

[Libertarian]
Support for rgun restriction is not an opposition to support for owning the means of self defense.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top