Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s both sad and funny how so many gun nuts think it would be impossible to disarm the American population if public sentiment were to change and a new amendment were passed to repeal the 2a.

Modern technology can already identify concealed weapons and it is only getting better while robotics and AI weapons systems are making hand held weapons obsolete.

Protect your 2a rights by being responsible and not making threats against political opponents and others you don’t want to consider as people. If you become the “threat” in the eyes of the public, laws will be turned against you.
You need 38 states to amend the Constitution. Right now 26 states have constitutional carry laws on the books. That is the right to carry concealed weapons in public without a permit. Many more recognize the right to gun ownership. No way is that going away to make room for your pusillanimous ideas.
 
You need 38 states to amend the Constitution. Right now 26 states have constitutional carry laws on the books. That is the right to carry concealed weapons in public without a permit. Many more recognize the right to gun ownership. No way is that going away to make room for your pusillanimous ideas.
Doesn't matter. If they ever managed to pull something like that off I reckon that approx. 30 million pissed off gun owners will put an end to the politicians that forced the matter and then there will be absolutely no question as to why the 2nd amendment exists.
 
You need 38 states to amend the Constitution. Right now 26 states have constitutional carry laws on the books. That is the right to carry concealed weapons in public without a permit. Many more recognize the right to gun ownership. No way is that going away to make room for your pusillanimous ideas.

Many gun nuts have said how if Trump had been killed there would have been a civil war - they would have retaliated against ‘them’ whoever the thought ‘they’ were.

Public sentiment already favors some forms of gun controls and with the current SCOTUS’s interpretation stripping the ability to place ‘infringements’ on the 2a there could easily become a new paradigm of public opinion.

I’ve been a gun toting leftist all of my life. Having friends murdered had a drastic impact on my positions. If wannabe revolutionaries open fire on random strangers in a big way things could drastically change.

I’m not an anti-gun extremist. I’m an enthusiast and I’m saying what I am as a cautionary statement. I don’t want to lose the 2a but I do want some reasonable restrictions.

You want “reasonable restrictions” too but you probably won’t admit it - you just draw different lines for what you consider ‘reasonable’.

Think about it. Is it ‘reasonable’ to restrict guns from Trump rallies? From air travel? From courtrooms? Those are infringements.

If enough people decide we need more infringements but the 2a doesn’t allow it, the public will demand a change.
 
Doesn't matter. If they ever managed to pull something like that off I reckon that approx. 30 million pissed off gun owners will put an end to the politicians that forced the matter and then there will be absolutely no question as to why the 2nd amendment exists.

Yeah? So you’re just going to kill everyone? Does that make more sense than allowing some restrictions?


Disarming the population would not be impossible.

Gun control could be strengthened and transportation bans could be imposed, making it a crime to carry them off of private property.

I’ve read a lot about new technologies. We’re on the cusp of robotics being able to stand against any number of people.

Some people say you couldn’t search everyone. Rather than write it all out myself I asked ChatGPT:

What technology is available that can detect concealed firearms carried by people in crowds or in public?

Here’s its answer:

There are several emerging technologies designed to detect concealed firearms in crowds. These technologies typically focus on non-intrusive scanning and artificial intelligence (AI) to identify potential threats without the need for physical searches. Here are some key examples:

1. **Millimeter-Wave Scanners**:
- These scanners emit millimeter waves that can penetrate clothing and reflect back images of concealed objects, such as firearms. They are often used in airports but are increasingly being adapted for use in public spaces and events.

2. **Terahertz Imaging**:
- Terahertz (THz) radiation can penetrate clothing and other materials but is non-ionizing, meaning it’s safer than X-rays. This technology can create images that reveal concealed weapons, and it can be used in a passive form (detecting natural THz radiation from objects) or in an active form (using a THz source to illuminate the object).

3. **AI-Powered Video Analytics**:
- These systems use advanced computer vision algorithms to analyze video feeds in real-time. The AI can be trained to recognize the shape, outline, or behavior patterns indicative of a concealed firearm. This technology can be integrated with existing surveillance cameras in public spaces.

4. **Magnetometers and Metal Detectors**:
- While traditional, modern advances allow for the integration of these detectors into discreet settings, such as door frames or handheld devices that can scan individuals in crowds without them being aware.

5. **Acoustic Sensors**:
- Some experimental technologies use acoustic sensors to detect the specific sounds associated with metal objects, like firearms, being moved or carried. This method is still in development but has potential for crowd scenarios.

6. **Infrared and Thermal Imaging**:
- These systems can detect temperature differences caused by concealed firearms, which may be cooler or warmer than the human body. They are often used in combination with other detection methods.

7. **Radar-Based Detection**:
- Radar systems can detect anomalies in clothing and the body shape of individuals that may indicate a concealed weapon. These systems can be deployed in stationary or portable setups.

8. **Explosive Trace Detection (ETD) Devices**:
- While primarily used to detect explosives, some ETD systems can also detect trace amounts of materials used in firearms. This technology is often used in conjunction with other detection methods.

These technologies are being refined to improve accuracy, reduce false positives, and ensure privacy. Each has its advantages and challenges, and in many cases, a combination of these technologies is employed to create a comprehensive security solution.


————

Joe Bob with a gun is going to bring the focus of public protection on himself if he wants to be an asshole.
 
The fatal mistake in that rambling pile of shit you're spewing is that those very same techniques and technologies will also be used by the gun owners. You are taking far to many variables for granted.
 
The demands coming mostly from conservatives and from Donald Trump himself have strengthened public identification data bases including information about political parties and activities.

Facial recognition systems are robust. Gait recognition can recognize people by their walk.

How much is dedicated to tracking the population is only a matter of priority, and the more people self identify as enemies of the state, the more focus they will draw to themselves.
 
The fatal mistake in that rambling pile of shit you're spewing is that those very same techniques and technologies will also be used by the gun owners. You are taking far to many variables for granted.

🤣 Explain yourself. Yeah, logic is shit to you. Triggered much?

Joe Bob rises up against the government. The government throws tech at him with no risk to personnel. Joe Bob’s friends do the same thing. They get put down too.

We’re going to have robot armies in the next ten years. Is Joe Bob going to make a stand now? If so he’s an enemy of the USA.
 
The fatal mistake in that rambling pile of shit you're spewing is that those very same techniques and technologies will also be used by the gun owners. You are taking far to many variables for granted.

He also doesn't understand tactics at all.

Any government force attempting to raid and seize guns at one residence will likely get away with it. They're going to run into a different scenario when they try to pull that shit again after the word gets out.

"Killing field" has a well understood definition and if the government needs to raid someone's home, then they're eventually going to walk into one. The result won't be pretty.

There was a bunch of gangbangers in Tacoma that learned that lesson the hard way.

https://www.military.com/history/time-army-rangers-got-gunfight-crips-street-gang.html

The police and FBI/Alphabet agencies won't fare any better.
 
If the government wanted to come and take your guns there isn't a damn thing you old fools could or would do about it except post memes and whine online. I know it and you know it so shut the fuck up.
 
Many gun nuts have said how if Trump had been killed there would have been a civil war - they would have retaliated against ‘them’ whoever the thought ‘they’ were.

Public sentiment already favors some forms of gun controls and with the current SCOTUS’s interpretation stripping the ability to place ‘infringements’ on the 2a there could easily become a new paradigm of public opinion.

I’ve been a gun toting leftist all of my life. Having friends murdered had a drastic impact on my positions. If wannabe revolutionaries open fire on random strangers in a big way things could drastically change.

I’m not an anti-gun extremist. I’m an enthusiast and I’m saying what I am as a cautionary statement. I don’t want to lose the 2a but I do want some reasonable restrictions.

You want “reasonable restrictions” too but you probably won’t admit it - you just draw different lines for what you consider ‘reasonable’.

Think about it. Is it ‘reasonable’ to restrict guns from Trump rallies? From air travel? From courtrooms? Those are infringements.

If enough people decide we need more infringements but the 2a doesn’t allow it, the public will demand a change.
Nobody knows what would have happened. You don't know any of those who allegedly made claims of retaliation, but it is hard to believe that the left could kill a leading candidate without civil unrest or some kind of tit for tat response. Any Democrat who thinks they can kill Trump and still have the allegiance of half of the American people is nuts.

Guns are already restricted by law from courtrooms, air travel, and Trump rallies, but then we have leftists like Oswald, and Crookes who care little for the law.
 
Guns are already restricted by law from courtrooms, air travel, and Trump rallies, but then we have leftists like Oswald, and Crookes who care little for the law.

Bingo! You get it!

Some infringements are already accepted. ✅

It’s a matter of priorities.
 
If the government wanted to come and take your guns there isn't a damn thing you old fools could or would do about it except post memes and whine online. I know it and you know it so shut the fuck up.

They’re in denial. It’s scary to imagine a force of military robots at their door.
 
He also doesn't understand tactics at all.

Any government force attempting to raid and seize guns at one residence will likely get away with it. They're going to run into a different scenario when they try to pull that shit again after the word gets out.

"Killing field" has a well understood definition and if the government needs to raid someone's home, then they're eventually going to walk into one. The result won't be pretty.

There was a bunch of gangbangers in Tacoma that learned that lesson the hard way.

https://www.military.com/history/time-army-rangers-got-gunfight-crips-street-gang.html

The police and FBI/Alphabet agencies won't fare any better.

The Black Panthers learned that the hard way.

Earth First drew the attention of the FBI when Judi Bari posed for a calendar photo holding an Uzi. It got her car bombed.
 
He also doesn't understand tactics at all.

Any government force attempting to raid and seize guns at one residence will likely get away with it. They're going to run into a different scenario when they try to pull that shit again after the word gets out.

"Killing field" has a well understood definition and if the government needs to raid someone's home, then they're eventually going to walk into one. The result won't be pretty.

There was a bunch of gangbangers in Tacoma that learned that lesson the hard way.

https://www.military.com/history/time-army-rangers-got-gunfight-crips-street-gang.html

The police and FBI/Alphabet agencies won't fare any better.



https://i.redd.it/aklzaink1gv01.png
 
Bingo! You get it!

Some infringements are already accepted. ✅

It’s a matter of priorities.
They have been for years, but the left isn't satisfied with any private gun ownership, they want them all removed. If that is what they want then it seems they'll have to spill their blood to achieve it. America is not populated with European pussies.
 
You mean, be like you? A pussy like you?


Go have some more Kool-AidTM....

I’m fine being a pussy. Lots of manly morons underestimate me.

Jim Jones liked guns and hated the government. The People’s Temple believed in him. What’s your favorite flavor of Kool-Aid?

Can you deepthroat an American Eagle?
 
He also doesn't understand tactics at all.

Any government force attempting to raid and seize guns at one residence will likely get away with it. They're going to run into a different scenario when they try to pull that shit again after the word gets out.

"Killing field" has a well understood definition and if the government needs to raid someone's home, then they're eventually going to walk into one. The result won't be pretty.

There was a bunch of gangbangers in Tacoma that learned that lesson the hard way.

https://www.military.com/history/time-army-rangers-got-gunfight-crips-street-gang.html

The police and FBI/Alphabet agencies won't fare any better.
Let's run some numbers.

There are approx. 50,000 sworn Federal Agents. This includes a goodly number that would be worthless for use in a gun confiscation scenario, The National Park Service, National Forest Service, National Game and Fish commission, DOE pro-force, IRS dweebs, etc. A significant number of agents are going to swing over to the gun owners side, Border Patrol, Sky Marshals, and DEA. 90% of the nations sheriffs and their deputies will support the gun owners. The survey has been done and the military will breakdown to 33% will join the gun owners and 33% will just stand down and not participate. The Navy and Air Force will be useless so that leaves damn few military to participate.

The big city police want to go home to their wives and families to so expect a goodly number of them to just walk away. They already have their hands full with the criminals they have to deal with.

Gun owners and enthusiastic shooters are designing nuclear weapons and all sorts of other clever little devices. Gun owners own AI companies and companies that build space ships and space ships are just ICBM's with a different sort of payload bolted on top.

30 million gun owners with trillions of rounds of ammunition.

The gun owners are the people that make this country work. They are the plumbers, carpenters, electricians, welders, the people that maintain the power grid and the pipelines, that plant and harvest the crops.

So go ahead and try to confiscate the guns, you will die of starvation in darkness.
 
Let's run some numbers.

There are approx. 50,000 sworn Federal Agents. This includes a goodly number that would be worthless for use in a gun confiscation scenario, The National Park Service, National Forest Service, National Game and Fish commission, DOE pro-force, IRS dweebs, etc. A significant number of agents are going to swing over to the gun owners side, Border Patrol, Sky Marshals, and DEA. 90% of the nations sheriffs and their deputies will support the gun owners. The survey has been done and the military will breakdown to 33% will join the gun owners and 33% will just stand down and not participate. The Navy and Air Force will be useless so that leaves damn few military to participate.

The big city police want to go home to their wives and families to so expect a goodly number of them to just walk away. They already have their hands full with the criminals they have to deal with.

Gun owners and enthusiastic shooters are designing nuclear weapons and all sorts of other clever little devices. Gun owners own AI companies and companies that build space ships and space ships are just ICBM's with a different sort of payload bolted on top.

30 million gun owners with trillions of rounds of ammunition.

The gun owners are the people that make this country work. They are the plumbers, carpenters, electricians, welders, the people that maintain the power grid and the pipelines, that plant and harvest the crops.

So go ahead and try to confiscate the guns, you will die of starvation in darkness.


They really have no idea at all how little they have right about what to expect if SHTF. It really will be like the ambush of the NKVD in the apartment stairwell. Maybe not the first time or 2, but once word gets around, and news of this set travels quickly.


https://i.pinimg.com/564x/95/ab/06/95ab063d13cfff3e7898ed04c832223c.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top