Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The first is Jesus claiming he’s the son of God. The second is him saying you should provide for the people in your household.

I don’t understand how you could construe either passage to mean “Jesus hates a pussy”.


That reference is to a book that an undercover ATF agent wrote. He had infiltrated a MC and didn't ride - bad choice. He was terrifiel of his bike and riding with them and used to psych himself by reminding himself that Jesus hates a pussy.
 
This is going as predicted.

Meanwhile, when it comes to the Left, guns and Trump, the law has been weaponized.
Justice took off her blindfold and burned it with her bra and now
she is the goddess of vengeance and hate;
tears for fears...

The last couple of days I’ve reported on a dystopian motion that was filed seeking to silence journalists from reporting on a high-profile case. Assistant United States Attorney Laura Cofer Taylor applied to the judge presiding over United States of America v. Ervin and Hoover in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, to have journalists John Crump and Richard Hughes censored, any fruits of their labors destroyed, and be subject to any other penalties the court would see fit. Crump and Hughes filed an emergency challenge to Taylor’s request and a group of 17 of the biggest online video journalists joined the pair by supporting them via an amicus brief. As reported by Crump during a live stream video with Hughes, and fellow video journalist Mark Davis, aka “DLD After Dark,” the motion to censor the lot was withdrawn.

The “Autokey Card” case involving Ervin and Hoover is at the center of this debate. That case, one rife with injustice and a modern-day witch hunt, has already seen the convictions of Ervin and Hoover for “violating the National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934 for selling machineguns and conspiracy.”

While Crump and Hughes are able to celebrate the victory of seeing the order request get retracted, we need to remember the larger piece of this picture is that Ervin and Hoover are currently in prison awaiting sentencing – for crimes that don’t exist as applied.



https://bearingarms.com/john-petrol...l-media-from-reporting-on-autokey-case-n73605



The ends always justifies the means. Trans has special rights while gun owners merely have privileges revoked...
 
Yeah, well, what can you say? Triggered??? It even got a vanity thread, so Wat must have done some brain-squatting at least for a few hours.


BTW, Wat went ahead and ordered that quarter-case of "LE" Cop KillerTM ammo. It should be here, sitting on my front porch and watched by the porch panther, along about Tuesday or Wednesday.


Once again, Wat's guns are defective. Woke up again, unslain by that evil bit of weaponry on the bedside table.


And ARs are still legal . . . .


https://i.imgur.com/jSVqVhch.jpg
 
Well, you need to upgrade to an AI gun – a Baldwin .38 Mr. Saturday Night Special,

... a barrel of blue and gold. It ain't good for nothing, 'cept to put a producer six-feet in a hole...
 
I wonder about the hate that would be produced by pointing out that the first "gun control" laws were passed in the Jim Crow era to put a tax on firearms to make it more difficult for the freedmen to afford them, just like poll taxes an' sich.


 
Exactly. The

Democrats did not want their former wards armed, but now they seem to like it since they mainly shoot each other.
 
The question that needs to be answered is, "Why do certain politicians want to disarm the public?" It's not to protect you. If it were then those very same politicians wouldn't be yapping about 'defunding the police.'
 
Uncle thinks that he is The Great Giver, and now he's taking it all back, indicating the he thinks he has us right where he wants us.
 
Uncle thinks that he is The Great Giver, and now he's taking it all back, indicating the he thinks he has us right where he wants us.
And they're doing everything they can to convince the public that that is the case. The first and second amendment DO NOT grant any rights. They prohibit the government from interfering with what is considered pre-existing rights.
 

The first and second amendments are not unlimited in their protection from government enacted consequences.

Ask Utah’s latest test case.

*nods*
 
Again, if a gun feels safe to you, that means without it you wouldn't . It's not rocket science.
1174, I hunt and fish in wilderness areas that are populated by bears and mountain lions. In those locations your not necessarily the top of the food chain. I've sold all of my modern firearms (except for two) a few years back and hunt exclusively with black powder muzzleloaders you have one chance to stop an attacking bear or mountain lion (wild animal attacks are rare but they do happen) especially after field dressing the animal your hands are bloody and the entrails are out in the open.
Yes..... a powerful revolver is reassuring. Or if I'm working with a large animal I don't trust. For the most part a gurl has no trouble, but every now and again you run into an asshole. It's better if you can escape over the panels, you'd just rather not destroy the animal. At 2 dollars a pound a 1500 hundred pound bovine is worth 3000 dollars hope this helps
 
1174, I hunt and fish in wilderness areas that are populated by bears and mountain lions. In those locations your not necessarily the top of the food chain. I've sold all of my modern firearms (except for two) a few years back and hunt exclusively with black powder muzzleloaders you have one chance to stop an attacking bear or mountain lion (wild animal attacks are rare but they do happen) especially after field dressing the animal your hands are bloody and the entrails are out in the open.
Yes..... a powerful revolver is reassuring. Or if I'm working with a large animal I don't trust. For the most part a gurl has no trouble, but every now and again you run into an asshole. It's better if you can escape over the panels, you'd just rather not destroy the animal. At 2 dollars a pound a 1500 hundred pound bovine is worth 3000 dollars hope this helps
Hunters don't get reassurance from their guns to feel safe. Hunters take their guns specifically to harm animals deliberately. The only reason they would feel unsafe is because they chose to put themselves in a situation that causes that.
..
But keep riding the bullshit. It's fun.
 
And they're doing everything they can to convince the public that that is the case. The first and second amendment DO NOT grant any rights. They prohibit the government from interfering with what is considered pre-existing rights.
^^^^^^^^^exactly.... all of the rights in the bill of rights are considered inalienable rights endowed by the creator..thus NOT granted by the feds, but rights you are born with.
Always remember this, an unarmed population is a slave population only a free people are armed......the anti gun nazis's are blind, or totalitarian in nature. it is the 2nd amendment that allows or guards the remaining bill of rights
These nazis need to read the gulag archipelago.......
 
Hunters don't get reassurance from their guns to feel safe. Hunters take their guns specifically to harm animals deliberately. The only reason they would feel unsafe is because they chose to put themselves in a situation that causes that.
..
But keep riding the bullshit. It's fun.
Do you hunt?
 
Not only do I choose to hunt I enjoy it, 1174 harvesting an animal is only a small portion of the hunt, it's much more that tagging an animal. I've been in locations where the beauty is absolutely breath taking. In places where you believe you can reach up a touch the face of God.
 
I didn't say just mass shootings. However this is one of your problems with perception. You zone in on the one word you have a problem with and ignore everything else. We have people getting shot in driveways, we have children getting shot by angry men, we have shootings in the streets, we have shootings in schools, we have shootings in malls, we have random shootings every single day. Multiple times per day.

And most of them got their guns legally and were, until the shooting happened, classified as "responsible gun owners". 🙄
We have, fatal car crashes, death due to drug overdose, drownings, stabbings, domestic violence, kidnappings, industrial accidents. Poisoning...... ect. so what is your point.
 
Not only do I choose to hunt I enjoy it, 1174 harvesting an animal is only a small portion of the hunt, it's much more that tagging an animal. I've been in locations where the beauty is absolutely breath taking. In places where you believe you can reach up a touch the face of God.
You feel more comfortable having a gun in non hunting scenarios.

Why?
 
Do you hunt?
Obviously he doesn't he just likes to run his mouth. Post 91 is a perfect example. On Main St. when you may have only seconds to react law enforcement is minutes away. 1174 never leaves his basement so he is insulated from life.
 
Last edited:
Obviously he doesn't he just likes to run his mouth. Post 91 is a perfect example. On Main St. when you may have only seconds to react act law enforcement is minutes away. 1174 never leaves his basement so he is insulated from life.
The hunting question was to avoid the topic that guns remediate fear of other people
 
And they're doing everything they can to convince the public that that is the case. The first and second amendment DO NOT grant any rights. They prohibit the government from interfering with what is considered pre-existing rights.


Uncle has made many things go away Wait'll he casts his gaze on Social (In)Security.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top