Watch Out For Mad Conspiracy Theories!!!

Cap’n AMatrixca said:
At least I didn't sleep through my physics classes.

What was your degree in again?

English comp with a minor in conspiracy?

I think you reversed his degrees – if he has any
 
woody54 said:
If you understand anything about structures, it pretty much is like that to start with. The interesting part is how "experts" claim these buildings acted under duress like none others in the world of fire disasters. Why is that? It is a question that draws the soundness of other American constructions into question if they can just fall over after a little upper floor fire.
Are Americans building unsafe buidings? To accept NIST reports, they are.



Every heard of rivets, joyces and various other forms of attaching one piece of material to another? For christ's sake man, arguing that it was a controlled demolishion based in part on the debris being able to fit on a 30' flatbed truck is laughable because its likely (I'd need to see the plans) that any building of that size has few or no steel beams that are over 30' in length. Let alone forgetting the use of cutting torches to be able to cut a beam in half, thirds or fourths if they were longer than 30'.
 
It’s easier for the Woody’s of the world to believe in conspiracy theories than to acquire any knowledge of simple mechanics. Trying to figure out that fire burns and makes things hot is beyond them. They have probably watched several controlled demolitions on TV, and yet, because of their strong paranoid delusions, can’t see the difference between a controlled demolition and what took place at the towers.

Show them a thousand times and they refuse to see that steel looses strength at those temperatures. They will use the Windsor Madrid fire to “prove” that fire won’t bring down a building, when in fact the Madrid building collapsed almost exactly like the towers did. (note the oft mentioned “no other building it the world has ever collapsed from fire alone”) The only differences being the Madrid building took longer and didn’t come clear down because it hadn’t been pre-damaged by an airplane and had fewer floors above the fire.

If they can explain all that shit ask how someone managed to sneak several thousand pounds of explosives (one left wing lunatic estimates 28 thousand pounds) into the building and string a few miles if prima cord all over the place without being seen.

The whole deal isn’t worth this long a post, but I have a curiosity. I wonder what is wired wrong in their heads?

Do they think like that because they can’t deal with reality? They can’t do anything about the Arabs (or whomever) so they need another target, one they can at least vote against?

So, with absolutely NO evidence in favor of their theory and reams of evidence to the contrary they believe in a controlled demolition, chem trails, the holocaust never happened, the Mason’s did it, or whatever is “in” this week.

On a smaller scale becomes "Bush lied"
 
sigh said:
Wow! Now MIT is in on it too. How fucking big is this conspiracy? Anytime anybody points out a flaw in your arguments, you just toss them into the conspiracy pile along with the hundreds of others you've already stacked in there.

Pretty clever. Can't argue with a system like that.

Amazing what OUR Government was able to pull off, huh? The same Government that was able to show us all the WMDs they told us were in Iraq.

Ya gotta believe!!! :)
 
JackAssJim said:
E. Howard Hunt and two from my LIst.

I can hot wire a vibrator *nods*

... but I don't know nothin' 'bout wirin' no buildin' for kaboomin' *shakes head*
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
You gotta BELIEVE!!!

Fawk you, AJ. I just posted that before I saw you did! People are going to think we're the same person. :eek:
 
Pookie said:
Fawk you, AJ. I just posted that before I saw you did! People are going to think we're the same person. :eek:


I think I just killed the phone call thread...

;) ;) :D

Ahm a terrist too!!!
 
Lovelynice said:
Lovelynice said:
Lovelynice said:
Lovelynice said:
Lovelynice said:
You mean you and the other shills have NEVER, not even ONCE, managed to cite a single occassion with any kind of evidence when steel & concrete tower buildings had collapsed at near free fall speed into their own footprint - except with CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

And that is exactly how the WTC towers were taken down, and none of "Arabs did it" lunatics and liars have ever managed to show otherwise.


It is enough to know that the buildings fell too fast, seismic traces do not match the collapse times, evidence was illegally destroyed, the patriot act passed in an anthrax storm originating from american military labs, the president saw something on TV that was never on TV, the vice president mentioned that the terrorists used missiles, and that flight 93 was shot down by a missile, institutionalised torture, omnipotently sweeping police powers, 'protest zones', etc....

all just coincidence, sure, sure, sure...like anyone is going to believe obvious shills and political spin.

And this is so plainly a controlled demolition, it blows all your bullshit excuses away
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif

still waiting for you shills to cite a single occassion with any kind of evidence when steel & concrete tower buildings had collapsed at near free fall speed into their own footprint - except with CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

I guess you can't, neh?

Losers.

Still waiting....

Come on LOSERS!

Still waiting.... and waiting...and waiting.

I've been waiting for weeks.

Why has it taken you lot so long to find a SINGLE photo or cite SINGLE example?

STILL WAITING!
 
woody54 said:
If only the official story co-conspirators will give me some logical answers to my questions, I will go away.


Problem being , they cant explain the integrity if their story because it doesnt stand scrutiny.

Exactly, they can't. They only give excuses to make up for their lack of any evidence which stands scrutiny.
 
Lovelynice said:
Exactly, they can't. They only give excuses to make up for their lack of any evidence which stands scrutiny.

I've posted plenty, which you refuse to even address. It's over, shithead.
 
woody54 to Acanthus said:
How much heat and from what source?
What was different in this fire that has never been repeated in any other steel framed building fire and why did the debris footprint not extend far beyond the building base, a situation very unexpected when softened steel structures collapse by toppling over intact until ground contact.

Did I mention the concrete debris thing? Never seen before.

What has gone awry with American building materials.

Funny how these Magic Arabs Did It nutcases dodge the difficult stuff...

Acanthus, where's your answer to these questions???
 
Gringao said:
We engineers...we've made it all up. None of this stuff works at all.

It’s about damned time you confessed. They say it’s good for the soul.
 
Gringao said:
I've posted plenty, which you refuse to even address. It's over, shithead.

Still waiting for you shills to cite an examples...
Lovelynice said:
Lovelynice said:
Lovelynice said:
Lovelynice said:
Lovelynice said:
Lovelynice said:
You mean you and the other shills have NEVER, not even ONCE, managed to cite a single occassion with any kind of evidence when steel & concrete tower buildings had collapsed at near free fall speed into their own footprint - except with CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

And that is exactly how the WTC towers were taken down, and none of "Arabs did it" lunatics and liars have ever managed to show otherwise.


It is enough to know that the buildings fell too fast, seismic traces do not match the collapse times, evidence was illegally destroyed, the patriot act passed in an anthrax storm originating from american military labs, the president saw something on TV that was never on TV, the vice president mentioned that the terrorists used missiles, and that flight 93 was shot down by a missile, institutionalised torture, omnipotently sweeping police powers, 'protest zones', etc....

all just coincidence, sure, sure, sure...like anyone is going to believe obvious shills and political spin.

And this is so plainly a controlled demolition, it blows all your bullshit excuses away
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif

still waiting for you shills to cite a single occassion with any kind of evidence when steel & concrete tower buildings had collapsed at near free fall speed into their own footprint - except with CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

I guess you can't, neh?

Losers.

Still waiting....

Come on LOSERS!

Still waiting.... and waiting...and waiting.

I've been waiting for weeks.

Why has it taken you lot so long to find a SINGLE photo or cite SINGLE example?

STILL WAITING!
 
Back
Top