Wat’s Carbon Water-N-Stuff Thread - Concepts In Iron And Wood!!!

you said you would participate in random acts of kindness and not seek notice over it.


I said that, dumb shit. You don't know who(m) you're referring on the same fucking page, and that makes you unbelievable, which is the litter mate of lying. Besides, odds are, you're breathing. Humans lie - it's what we do, whether it be the conscious lie we tell others or the delusions we live in, like "Joe's sharp as a tack."


You might notice that I don't reply to you. You're dull as dishwater. I'd suggest that Off is the direction in which you should fuck, and that you'd do well to stay there.
I'll wear your post as a badge of honor and put in on a magnet next to my dishwasher. I believe this is my first insult from you. Thanks.

"You might notice that I don't reply to you," you wrote.

Begging your pardon, you just did. :)😙
 
801e06b553f226e0-jpeg.2326297
 
Good thing I recall a bit from an old university logic course. It's useful here.

This is a Harpy classic—demanding I prove a negative while wiggling out of proving your own claim. That’s like accusing me of being a werewolf and then insisting it's my job to prove I’m not howling at the moon. Cute trick, but no dice, Arphy. The tests of logic doesn't work that way.

In the realm of Reasoning and Logic this is called a logical fallacy. It known as shifting the burden of proof (or argumentum ad ignorantiam). You made a claim ("That is a lie"), so you shall provide evidence, not demand that the I must prove a negative.

Your argument boils down to ‘people lie, therefore you must be lying.’ By that logic, since people also breathe, should I assume you’re hyperventilating right now?

And let’s not ignore the plot twist—you just admitted you lie for fun.
So I’m supposed to trust a self-proclaimed liar to tell me that I’m lying? That’s rich. If anything, I should be asking you to prove you’re telling the truth about me lying.

But hey, if this is how your concept of logic works now, then congratulations—you just proved I’m the Pope!

Hey, I'm not lying. Truth is, your ass failed a logic exercise by being a self-admitted liar.

Classic bullshittery to avoid facing the truth.

You're a liar who refuses to admit that you're a liar. Instead you engage in Ad Hominem attack to bolster your refusal.

All that's left to say is; Fuck off asshole. No one believes your crap anymore.
 
Classic bullshittery to avoid facing the truth.

You're a liar who refuses to admit that you're a liar. Instead you engage in Ad Hominem attack to bolster your refusal.

All that's left to say is; Fuck off asshole. No one believes your crap anymore.


It’s just just like that guy, Mudd, from the original Star Trek series. Difference is, we are not androids whose heads can be melted. I’m good with that.


Pity they don’t get what they earned….
 
Ah, the triggering that this thread causes is truly the gift that keeps on giving


And then the ass cancer of the triggered will be the second gift that keeps on giving. May it arrive soonest for all recipients.


Allah truly is merciful and beneficent, all praises to his holy name‼️
 
Classic bullshittery to avoid facing the truth.

You're a liar who refuses to admit that you're a liar. Instead you engage in Ad Hominem attack to bolster your refusal.

All that's left to say is; Fuck off asshole. No one believes your crap anymore.
:nana:
I understand your frustration—failing in an argument can be difficult. But lashing out with ‘bullshittery’ and calling my response ad hominem doesn’t change the fact that you failed to refute my point.

Your argument was built on the assumption that I must be lying because people lie. That’s as flimsy as a fox in Aesop's fable calling grapes sour when he can’t reach them. You assumed you had an easy win, but when challenged by an eighty-seven-year-old, you resorted to ridicule instead of reasoning.

You claim I must prove my honesty while exempting yourself from proving your assertion—yet you’ve openly admitted to lying for humor. I see why this bothers you, and my condolences for the struggle; I hope @Wat_Tyler helped ease your pain. But the reality remains: I said I gave up lying in 1971. You don’t know the circumstances; your broad generalization doesn’t change that.
 
:nana:
I understand your frustration—failing in an argument can be difficult. But lashing out with ‘bullshittery’ and calling my response ad hominem doesn’t change the fact that you failed to refute my point.

Your argument was built on the assumption that I must be lying because people lie. That’s as flimsy as a fox in Aesop's fable calling grapes sour when he can’t reach them. You assumed you had an easy win, but when challenged by an eighty-seven-year-old, you resorted to ridicule instead of reasoning.

You claim I must prove my honesty while exempting yourself from proving your assertion—yet you’ve openly admitted to lying for humor. I see why this bothers you, and my condolences for the struggle; I hope @Wat_Tyler helped ease your pain. But the reality remains: I said I gave up lying in 1971. You don’t know the circumstances; your broad generalization doesn’t change that.

People lie. People who say they NEVER lie, are liars.

Bullshit against that all you want, we ALL know you lie.

The question isn't whether you lie or not, because we all do it. THE question is, and always will be, whether your lies harm others.

Mine do not.

Yours do. Because you LIE in order to promote yourself over others while causing them to suffer for your benefit.
 
In lieu of pushing the simple-minded down the stairs:


Actions motivated by attachment, aversion, or ignorance, regardless of any external appearances, are simply not Buddhist practices.

~ Lorne Ladner


https://64.media.tumblr.com/e4c50d8fe8ff34cf5075062d7d088449/tumblr_mymmr3Qmso1sjwt33o1_1280.jpg
Perhaps she isn't thinking of pushing her husband down the stairs... just exchanging meaningful glances over finding him asleep with his fucktoy on the couch. The weapon is just a prop... in case he needs more than a meaningful glance. It would make a great story starter... The Mike Hammer event is open until July 15. You could write one.
 
People lie. People who say they NEVER lie, are liars.

Bullshit against that all you want, we ALL know you lie.

The question isn't whether you lie or not, because we all do it. THE question is, and always will be, whether your lies harm others.

Mine do not.

Yours do. Because you LIE in order to promote yourself over others while causing them to suffer for your benefit.
Ah, I see—we’ve moved from ‘proving I lied’ to ‘your lies harm people.’ It's a convenient shift, but I’m not letting you off the hook that easily.

You started by insisting I was lying, yet when challenged, you abandoned logic and went straight to moral condemnation. Classic move.

Now, you claim to know my motivations and that my supposed lies are harmful—without a shred of evidence. Meanwhile, you openly admit to lying but assure us yours are the ‘good’ kind. How convenient.

Here’s the reality: You made a claim. You failed to prove it. You shifted the argument. And now you’re throwing accusations to cover for it. That’s not reasoning—that’s flailing.

Better luck next time.
 
Back
Top