WAR! N Korea attacks S Korea, I BLAME WOK!

[semen4her]

Only you imbeciles could make a connection between a S Korean ship and Obama.

Go outside and get some fresh air already.

 

[Karen Kraft]

I told Barack, last time he called me for advice, that it's very simple: Tell China that the U.S. is going to be providing two or three hundred nuclear warheads and missiles to Japan, for their own protection against North Korea. The idea of a nuclear Japan is such a nasty thought for the Chinese (not without some justification, history being what it is), that they will stop supporting North Korea.

Among other things, selling nukes to Japan will help the balance of payments situation vis a vis Japan, as they hold more of our debt than you can shake a nuke at.

 

[Karen Kraft]

Only you imbeciles could make a connection between a S Korean ship and Obama.

Go outside and get some fresh air already.

You really don't get it: Nobody really cares about Obama, except for comic relief.

 

[semen4her]

You really don't get it: Nobody really cares about Obama, except for comic relief.

*waits for the comedic part*

 

[Karen Kraft]

*waits for the comedic part*

Pack a lunch; it could be a while.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Barack's more likely to send nukes to North Korea to protect it from South Korea and Japan...




Follow the money and you'll see who the evil exploiters are.

 

[Mike_Yates]

South Korean ship sinking, North attack suspected: report

Reuters
Friday, March 26, 2010; 11:38 AM



SEOUL (Reuters) - A South Korean naval vessel with more than 100 aboard was sinking on Friday in waters near North Korea and Seoul was investigating whether it was hit in a torpedo attack by the North, South Korean media said.

Broadcaster SBS said many South Korean sailors on the stricken vessel were feared dead.

South Korea's YTN TV network said the government was investigating whether the sinking was due to a torpedo attack by the North, and Yonhap news agency said the Seoul government had convened an emergency meeting of security-related ministers.

Yonhap also reported a South Korean navy ship firing toward an unidentified vessel to the north.

North Korea in recent weeks has said it was bolstering its defenses in response to joint South Korean-U.S. military drills that were held this month.

What about that other South Korean military ship which capsized under questionable circumstances a few weeks ago?

North Korea?

False flag operation as a pretext for war?

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Not war...





Blackmail.

 

[Songcatcher]

The Korean are the most backwards sheeple on earth, more than the Moslems. Their country is devided North and South by the Illuminati, and they only point their finger at Japan.

It's a fucking joke.




Mind you, because of this; the Asian Union remainds the Illumiiati's wet dream.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Jesus H. Christ!

I thought Mike Yates was out to lunch...



Turns out he's just part of the buffet.

 

[busybody..]

The South Koreans have released a report on the recent sinking of one of their ships, based in part on intelligence provided by the United States, which asserts that it was a torpedo fired by a North Korean submarine that sunk their ship.


South Korea's military believes a torpedo fired from a North Korean submarine sank its navy ship last month, based on intelligence gathered jointly with the United States, a news report said on Thursday.

The Yonhap news report appears to be the clearest sign yet that Seoul blames Pyongyang for what would be one of the deadliest incidents between the rivals since the end of the 1950-53 Korean War. It puts more political pressure on President Lee Myung-bak, but analysts do not see it triggering a war.
The military's intelligence arm sent the report of "certain" North Korean involvement to the presidential Blue House soon after the incident, Yonhap quoted a high-ranking military source as saying.


Tensions on the Korean peninsula stay in normal state of unease, and this certainly is not going to help. The constant sabre rattling and threatening posture of the North Koreans is something the people living in the south have learned to accept over time, but this is going to put intense pressure on the South Korean president.

The other part though is to keep an eye and an ear out for what the United States reaction to this provocation is. Given all of the smart diplomacy we have seen from this administration I expect to see Hillary in Pyongyang apologizing to the 'Supreme Leader' for the obvious lack of navigation skills of the South Korean sailors and probably offering to trade a few pounds of enriched uranium for promises that they will not carry out any further attacks.

For those of you who received your entire education in government schools it is important to let you know that the Korean War was never officially ended. There was a ceasefire resolution signed, but the North has always maintained that they will resume hostilities anytime they wish. Every time one of these incidents happen the tension becomes palpable in Korea. I was there when Kim Il-Sung, father of the current leader, died. Our forces immediately went on alert and deployed, realizing we would be nothing more then a speed bump should the North decide to vacation in Seoul. After about 24 hours Clinton ordered us to stand down, which shook all of us by surprise. We left our dispersed battle positions and returned to our barracks. The reasoning was they didn't want us to appear to be provoking the North, which was funny--not in a funny way when your ass is on the line--in that the North was massing everything they had on the border. Returning us to our bases drew up images of Pearl Harbor. Nobody got a good night's sleep for a couple of weeks, but fortunately the situation calmed down. For you Clintonistas who think us standing down was what eased the tension, think again. There was an intense power struggle taking place in North Korea between the new dictator and the military which kept them poised but unable to move.

The conventional wisdom in the wake of this most recent incident and the revelation of the North's involvement will not result in much of a response from the south, but I bet you can be assured 'The Dear Leader' of the North will have plenty to say and all of it will be blaming the United States working in cahoots with the South Koreans to fabricate the whole thing.

You know, like AhmaDinnerJacket does with Israel and the United States.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Only you imbeciles could make a connection between a S Korean ship and Obama.

Go outside and get some fresh air already.

On Thursday, Seoul accused North Korea of firing a torpedo into one of its frigates. Forty-six sailors died on March 26 when an explosion ripped their vessel, the Cheonan, in two.

When parts of the ship were raised, investigators immediately saw that metal was bent inward. Therefore, an external explosion destroyed the warship, eliminating the possibility of an accidental detonation of its magazine. Some then speculated that a mine, perhaps left floating after the Korean War, tore apart the Cheonan. South Korea’s Yonhap News Agency then reported that divers had recovered torpedo fragments from the sea bed. So the sinking had to have been the result of a recent — and deliberate — act.

And who was responsible? One of the torpedo fragments bore North Korean markings. Moreover, the recovered parts were identical to those depicted in a blueprint of a torpedo in a North Korean marketing brochure. Investigators also found traces of a mix of explosives used by communist-bloc countries, including North Korea. Other evidence, analyzed by a group of specialists from six nations, pointed to the only plausible culprit: Pyongyang.

So what will the United States, required by treaty to defend South Korea, do about the sinking? Just hours after the incident, Washington leaned on President Lee Myung-bak to stay quiet and forego retaliation for the ghastly crime. The Obama administration has so far failed to label the torpedo attack an act of war. On Thursday, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that North Korea had already been punished merely because it had further isolated itself from the international community by committing the horrific act.

...

States like Kim’s Korea, however, may look at Washington’s so-far inadequate response to the Cheonan incident and believe that a future act of nuclear terrorism just might go unpunished. If so, deterrence could fail.

How could that happen? It would take weeks — and perhaps months — to conclusively determine the source of fissile material used by nuclear terrorists. The International Atomic Energy Agency, the home of “cutting-edge forensics,” can find a particle that is out of place and measure things that weigh no more than a femtogram, 0.000000000000001 of a gram. Its technicians can look at the smallest speck of uranium and find out how it was formed.

But the IAEA’s near-magical work takes time, just as it took time to establish responsibility for the Cheonan’s sinking. Intelligence analysts knew within hours that the North Koreans used a torpedo to sink the vessel, but detective works requires patience — in this case, more than seven weeks — to find, analyze, and present evidence.

As hours turn into days, days into weeks, and weeks into months, the certainty of a retaliatory response decreases. In our complex world, there is always a reason not to act, and those reasons grow stronger over time. In the Cheonan case, we are already hearing the calls for South Korea to move on and consider “the broader issues.”

...

Deterrence looks like it might fail soon. The Cheonan incident could convince Chairman Kim and other potential aggressors that they will pay no price for committing horrible acts. Even in such a clear-cut circumstance as the sinking of the South Korean frigate, the international community is having trouble imposing punishments on the aggressor.

When responsibility is murkier, the urge to retaliate will be even more muted. And that can give ideas to terrorism-sponsoring states. Take Iran, for instance. As the Islamic Republic builds its links with al-Qaeda and accelerates the enrichment of uranium, we have to wonder whether the mullahs think the slow — and uncertain — response to the sinking of the Cheonan will make nuclear terrorism a possible option for them.

So there is a lot riding on Washington’s response to the sinking of the Cheonan. This is not just about South Korea.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-...ailure-of-nuclear-deterrence/?singlepage=true

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

I wonder if Kim could come to Congress, blast Arizona as "racist" and get a standing "O" from the Democrats...

 

[Songcatcher]

American nukes have been in and out of Japanese ports since the 1950s. (This is against Japanese constitution, by the way.)

Don't tell me you didn't know.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

WASHINGTON -- It is perfectly obvious that Iran's latest uranium maneuver, brokered by Brazil and Turkey, is a ruse. Iran retains more than enough enriched uranium to make a bomb. And it continues enriching at an accelerated pace and to a greater purity (20 percent). Which is why the French foreign ministry immediately declared that the trumpeted temporary shipping of some Iranian uranium to Turkey will do nothing to halt Iran's nuclear program.

It will, however, make meaningful sanctions more difficult. America's proposed Security Council resolution is already laughably weak -- no blacklisting of Iran's central bank, no sanctions against Iran's oil and gas industry, no nonconsensual inspections on the high seas. Yet Turkey and Brazil -- both current members of the Security Council -- are so opposed to sanctions that they will not even discuss the resolution. And China will now have a new excuse to weaken it further.

But the deeper meaning of the uranium-export stunt is the brazenness with which Brazil and Turkey gave cover to the mullahs' nuclear ambitions and deliberately undermined U.S. efforts to curb Iran's program.

The real news is that already notorious photo: the president of Brazil, our largest ally in Latin America, and the prime minister of Turkey, for more than half a century the Muslim anchor of NATO, raising hands together with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the most virulently anti-American leader in the world.

That picture -- a defiant, triumphant take-that-Uncle-Sam -- is a crushing verdict on the Obama foreign policy. It demonstrates how rising powers, traditional American allies, having watched this administration in action, have decided that there's no cost in lining up with America's enemies and no profit in lining up with a U.S. president given to apologies and appeasement.

They've watched President Obama's humiliating attempts to appease Iran, as every rejected overture is met with abjectly renewed U.S. negotiating offers. American acquiescence reached such a point that the president was late, hesitant and flaccid in expressing even rhetorical support for democracy demonstrators who were being brutally suppressed and whose call for regime change offered the potential for the most significant U.S. strategic advance in the region in 30 years.

They've watched America acquiesce to Russia's re-exerting sway over Eastern Europe, over Ukraine (pressured by Russia last month into extending for 25 years its lease of the Black Sea naval base at Sevastopol) and over Georgia (Russia's de facto annexation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia is no longer an issue under the Obama "reset" policy).

They've watched our appeasement of Syria, Iran's agent in the Arab Levant -- sending our ambassador back to Syria even as it tightens its grip on Lebanon, supplies Hezbollah with Scuds, and intensifies its role as the pivot of the Iran-Hezbollah-Hamas alliance. The price for this ostentatious flouting of the U.S. and its interests? Ever more eager U.S. "engagement."

They've observed the administration's gratuitous slap at Britain over the Falklands, its contemptuous treatment of Israel, its undercutting of the Czech Republic and Poland, and its indifference to Lebanon and Georgia. And in Latin America, they see not just U.S. passivity as Venezuela's Hugo Chavez organizes his anti-American "Bolivarian" coalition while deepening military and commercial ties with Iran and Russia. They saw active U.S. support in Honduras for a pro-Chavez would-be dictator seeking unconstitutional powers in defiance of the democratic institutions of that country.

This is not just an America in decline. This is an America in retreat -- accepting, ratifying and declaring its decline, and inviting rising powers to fill the vacuum.

Nor is this retreat by inadvertence. This is retreat by design and, indeed, on principle. It's the perfect fulfillment of Obama's adopted Third World narrative of American misdeeds, disrespect and domination from which he has come to redeem us and the world. Hence his foundational declaration at the U.N. General Assembly last September that "No one nation can or should try to dominate another nation" (guess who's been the dominant nation for the last two decades?) and his dismissal of any "world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another." (NATO? The West?)

Given Obama's policies and principles, Turkey and Brazil are acting rationally. Why not give cover to Ahmadinejad and his nuclear ambitions? As the U.S. retreats in the face of Iran, China, Russia and Venezuela, why not hedge your bets? There's nothing to fear from Obama, and everything to gain by ingratiating yourself with America's rising adversaries. After all, they actually believe in helping one's friends and punishing one's enemies.

Charles Krauthammer

When the Obamanation reads American history, they don't see the story of a great nation driven by the ideal of liberty, they see an indictment of an oppressor emboldened by liberty...
__________________
With iPods and iPads and Xboxes and Playstations -- none of which I know how to work -- information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation.
Barack Hussein Obama

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

"Defensive measures are very difficult and limited," said Lieutenant General Park Jing-e in response to WorldTribune's question at the show-and-tell on Thursday put on by South Korea's Defense Ministry on the episode in the West or Yellow Sea in which 46 sailors lost their lives. "The most effective way to destroy the submarine is to destroy it when it's identified at the port."

...

In the end, said the report, "The evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that the torpedo was fired by a North Korean submarine." There was, it said "no other plausible explanation".

All of which may be of great interest but of less than great impact if the Chinese refuse to buy it. A Chinese diplomat was notably absent from the Defense Ministry briefing to which diplomatic and military officials were in attendance. All a Chinese official in Beijing was reported as saying was the whole affair was "unfortunate" - a response that Korean officials find more than a little upsetting.

The words of UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon, a soft-lining former foreign minister for South Korea who led its attempts at reconciliation with the North in previous government in Seoul, were not all that encouraging. He called the investigation "troubling", not exactly a call for UN action.

Under the circumstances, all General Park could say when asked what the South would do to prevent further attacks was that "our plan is to reinforce submarine measures by establishing a submarine detection system in areas that are vulnerable to such infiltration". That response was less than reassuring, considering that he also acknowledged, in this case, "We were not able to expect that a submarine once seaborne was going to infiltrate our waters."

This is a standoff in which it's wise to expect the unexpected. The sense, though, is the North has made a fundamental point. There's not much South Korea will do beside engage in threats and words while China makes up for the losses in trade, aid and diplomatic sympathy.

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ea_nkorea0442_05_21.asp

 

[ivantheterrible]

war in korea? officially the war has never ended in korea.

 

[Veryknowing]

Another stupidly done frame-up.

It was a GERMAN-made torpedo.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6460FC20100507

North Korea doesn't buy their torpedos from Germany, guess who does? Why was an Israeli Polaris-class submarine hanging around that area anyway?

Think about it logically. North Korea has never been shy about showing off their military capabilities and readiness to shoot. They've always been quick to say about any military incident "We did it! Don't push us or we'll push back!"

War wouldn't be in North Korea's interest. They have no motive for starting one.

Who could gain from a war started between North and South Korea? The USA possibly could, israel could too - they've been trying claim that North Korea is supporting Iran for years.

Israel's Zionist-run military doesn't mind killing Americans and trying to start wars. Look at the USS Liberty attack
http://www.gtr5.com/

Israel doesn't mind blaming others for their terrorist attacks
Look at the Lavon Affair
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/lavon.html

The USA government's political administrations have a habit of lying in order to start wars too.
President McKinley told the American people that the USS Maine had been sunk in Havana Harbor by a Spanish mine. The American people, outraged by this apparent unprovoked attack, supported the Spanish American War. The Captain of the USS Maine had insisted the ship was sunk by a coal bin explosion, investigations after the war proved that such had indeed been the case. There had been no mine.

President Johnson lied about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident to convince Americans of the need for fighting a war in Vietnam
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/TWA/TONKIN.html

If you gullible fools want to believe that North Korea was behind the attack on that South Korean ship, you're just as dumb as those twits who fell for the lies about WMDs in Iraq.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

*groan*




Anti-Semitism is becoming the norm again for the far Left...

It's seemingly NEVER taken off the pogrom.

 

[Songcatcher]

South Korean president tells the leader of the North to apologise.

What is wrong with this picture.

 

[More_Malarky]

Thy Doom is Upon Thee

This all is just dust in the wind folks. Doom is upon us. The earth is disgusted at what we have done to it and soon she will rise up and shake us off her back into oblivion.

We are facing a real threat of World War. Our resources are being exhausted. The globe is headed for economic collapse. Our ecosystem is in ruin. The rain forest and our oceans being destroyed. Racial hatred and misguided religious fervor will destroy us. Home grown terrorist joining the Jihad. We are not safe in our own homes people.

2012 is around the corner. We laugh and point and say those that believe in this are nutz yet even NASA has bent their very large craniums to analyze this theory.

We are discovering that the "ancients" were further ahead then we gave credit. It is my firm belief that man is much older then we thought. I believe civilizations rise and later crushed to only rise yet again. Much evidence supports such thought.

New and interesting theories has emerged about the "ancients" Is this flights of fancy or are they unto something. We laugh and scoff at alien visitation yet all across the globe we find ancient signs. Cave drawing. Religious texts. To much evidence to be considered coincidence.

The true origins of man is yet a mystery. Did God create us? Did we rise up from the primordial ooze of evolution? Many theories exist. It is in my mind that our present day civilization shall fail and we will be ground to dust.

I wonder how our descendants that may survive will look upon the bones we leave behind. Will they look upon us as barbaric or will they see what could of been. We are truly a magnificent race yet our minds are closed to realize our potential. Our arrogance is the biggest sin of all.

The above is the ramblings of a very drunken man and should not be taking seriously. Please feel free to post some good porn pics.