renard_ruse
Break up Amazon
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2007
- Posts
- 16,094
So, we're only supposed to care about one form of criminal violence? 
Don't get me wrong, I'm a traditionalist and a romantic. I don't believe its ever ok for men to physically hit or harm a woman unless its self-defense, to protect someone else in eminent danger of potentially fatal violence, or in a war in which the woman has taken up arms against you or your country (in which case, ideally, both sides would agree that only men would take part but sadly, the feminazi's seem to want them involved now). I believe in the old honor code of the playground, that if you hit a girl you are the lowest pussy boy on the playground. That said, the problem with these campaigns is that they feed into the Big Lie that one sex has it worse in life than the other and there is some pervasive male patriarchy that constantly uses and abuses females (and only females).
Look at the names involved in starting this campaign:
Jack Layton was a lifelong socialist politician and union hack, who himself was caught going to prostitutes.
There's a reason Jack Layton and other socialists emphasize only certain forms of criminal violence. Its because they divide people into groups and pit them against each other so they can win elections. Its their thing, politically. The fact that there is far more male on male violence and male on male crime, than male on female, and by a wide margin, they won't tell you. No, because its about a narrative of some sort of all pervasive "oppression" of this group or that group which helps them get elected. Layton is dead, and its time for this stupid campaign to be buried with him.
Lets have an anti-violence against anyone campaign instead.
Don't get me wrong, I'm a traditionalist and a romantic. I don't believe its ever ok for men to physically hit or harm a woman unless its self-defense, to protect someone else in eminent danger of potentially fatal violence, or in a war in which the woman has taken up arms against you or your country (in which case, ideally, both sides would agree that only men would take part but sadly, the feminazi's seem to want them involved now). I believe in the old honor code of the playground, that if you hit a girl you are the lowest pussy boy on the playground. That said, the problem with these campaigns is that they feed into the Big Lie that one sex has it worse in life than the other and there is some pervasive male patriarchy that constantly uses and abuses females (and only females).
Look at the names involved in starting this campaign:
Jack Layton was a lifelong socialist politician and union hack, who himself was caught going to prostitutes.
There's a reason Jack Layton and other socialists emphasize only certain forms of criminal violence. Its because they divide people into groups and pit them against each other so they can win elections. Its their thing, politically. The fact that there is far more male on male violence and male on male crime, than male on female, and by a wide margin, they won't tell you. No, because its about a narrative of some sort of all pervasive "oppression" of this group or that group which helps them get elected. Layton is dead, and its time for this stupid campaign to be buried with him.
Lets have an anti-violence against anyone campaign instead.
