Venezuela

The results of the unofficial straw poll is in, 62% of sharks prefer their narco-terrorists raw. US SOCOM has announced that their strike options are under review.
I'm assuming you've been refreshing your resume to seek other employment?

Or are you just changing your commute route?
 
LOL...the law of war we put forth for other nations as part of the UN.

That thing is not the ROE, nor is it any actual law.

Besides, laws only matter if they are enforced. Democrats taught us that. Best of luck :D (y) impeaching and removing Trump for that.
is this the bot who was the pot farmer in northern california?
or
the one with the wife and kids in minn.?
or
the badass redneck from texas?
 
If you disagree with someone's politics and they tell you it's raining, all the screaming you might do that the sun is shining (when it isn't) won't make the rain stop. You've agreed that the boat was blown up by a drone from the USA military, with a follow-up strike that killed two people clinging to wreckage floating in the sea.

The Law of War Manual used by your own country explains on page 453, “After each engagement, parties to the conflict shall, without delay, take all possible measures to search for and collect the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked at sea, to protect them against pillage and ill-treatment, to ensure their adequate care, and to search for the dead and prevent their being despoiled.”
OK. got a point there?
 
Hel_Books said:
If you disagree with someone's politics and they tell you it's raining, all the screaming you might do that the sun is shining (when it isn't) won't make the rain stop. You've agreed that the boat was blown up by a drone from the USA military, with a follow-up strike that killed two people clinging to wreckage floating in the sea.

The Law of War Manual used by your own country explains on page 453, “After each engagement, parties to the conflict shall, without delay, take all possible measures to search for and collect the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked at sea, to protect them against pillage and ill-treatment, to ensure their adequate care, and to search for the dead and prevent their being despoiled.”

LOL...the law of war we put forth for other nations as part of the UN.

That thing is not the ROE, nor is it any actual law.

Besides, laws only matter if they are enforced. . . .
You're just making things worse for yourself. Now you're saying, "Yeah, it was wrong, but we're going to get away with it and we're total hypocrites and just say war crimes are wrong but that's not something we actually believe!"
 
It’s not a news story, it’s an opinion piece published by a left leaning rag. Ret General Jack Keene agreed that the hit was legal. I’ll take his word for it. Megyn Kelly interviewed a Jag officer who also agreed that the evidence appears to justify a strike based on radio transmissions alerting nearby druggies to come to their rescue. The congressional opinions for the most part will be along party lines and will prove nothing. Obama wrote the book on drone strikes.

🙄

ineedhelp1 slams The New Republic over left leaning reporting bias (though they didn’t even compile the report), while citing biased right wing reporting (opinions) from Megyn Kelly & Jack Keane that discounts the findings of the same report.

You can’t make this shit up…

😳

😑

👉 ineedhelp1 🤣

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Hel_Books said:
If you disagree with someone's politics and they tell you it's raining, all the screaming you might do that the sun is shining (when it isn't) won't make the rain stop. You've agreed that the boat was blown up by a drone from the USA military, with a follow-up strike that killed two people clinging to wreckage floating in the sea.

The Law of War Manual used by your own country explains on page 453, “After each engagement, parties to the conflict shall, without delay, take all possible measures to search for and collect the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked at sea, to protect them against pillage and ill-treatment, to ensure their adequate care, and to search for the dead and prevent their being despoiled.”

OK. got a point there?
Re-read the passage above. Concentrate on the mentions of "wounded" and "shipwrecked."
 
🙄

ineedhelp1 slams The New Republic over left leaning reporting bias (though they didn’t even compile the report), while citing biased right wing reporting (opinions) from Megyn Kelly & Jack Keane that discounts the findings of the same report.

You can’t make this shit up…

😳

😑

👉 ineedhelp1 🤣

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
it's always amusing when the magatards use hypocrisy to make their point.
 
Re-read the passage above. Concentrate on the mentions of "wounded" and "shipwrecked."

It's not a law, dipshit.

Further, under your scenario, one torpedo on target is enough to require the entire military to stand down while the target shoots back. Which is basically stupid and no military is going to do that.

Here, the boat was hit but not sunk. A second strike ensured that the boat sank and those on board were no longer able to direct or carry out a response attack.

Finally, they weren't "shipwrecked" they were targeted for destruction.
 
It's not a law, dipshit.

Further, under your scenario, one torpedo on target is enough to require the entire military to stand down while the target shoots back. Which is basically stupid and no military is going to do that.

Here, the boat was hit but not sunk. A second strike ensured that the boat sank and those on board were no longer able to direct or carry out a response attack.

Finally, they weren't "shipwrecked" they were targeted for destruction.

🙄

Here’s a good summary of where we stand with this fiasco:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/boat-attack-commander-says-had-201509883.html

😳 😑 🤣 🤬

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷

😳

😑

👉 Derpy 🤣

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
This is quite a fun bullshit statement.

Explain this. Be specific.
Pursuant to the delegated authority of the Commander-in-Chief, the Secretary of State hereby makes a determination that the targeted combatants qualify as terrorists, thus subject to lethal force.
 
Hel_Books said:
Re-read the passage above. Concentrate on the mentions of "wounded" and "shipwrecked."

Well Sparky, they were fucking dead, got it?
Apparently not, according to this:

Nine people died in the first strike on the vessel and two survivors were left clinging to the burning wreckage when it was struck again, killing them, according to the Washington Post. A US official has said four missiles were used in the operation.

The Trump administration has not denied there were survivors and has insisted the strikes on 2 September were "in accordance with the law of armed conflict".
 
Pursuant to the delegated authority of the Commander-in-Chief, the Secretary of State hereby makes a determination that the targeted combatants qualify as terrorists, thus subject to lethal force.
Lol

So if they lived in Chicago or Italy or Alaska

?

Same?
 
Pursuant to the delegated authority of the Commander-in-Chief, the Secretary of State hereby makes a determination that the targeted combatants qualify as terrorists, thus subject to lethal force.
On the other hand, simply declaring some guy in a boat allegedly smuggling drugs to be a "terrorist" doesn't make him one, does it?

Of course, your President has this fetish for pretending things aren't what they are (or are what they aren't), such as when he calls the mayor-elect of New York City a "muslim commie" while at the same time kissing Mohammed bin Salman's oily arse.
 
On the other hand, simply declaring some guy in a boat allegedly smuggling drugs to be a "terrorist" doesn't make him one, does it?
They're a terryrist

Of course, your President has this fetish for pretending things aren't what they are (or are what they aren't), such as when he calls the mayor-elect of New York City a "muslim commie" while at the same time kissing Mohammed bin Salman's oily arse.
 
Rightguide said:
Pursuant to the delegated authority of the Commander-in-Chief, the Secretary of State hereby makes a determination that the targeted combatants qualify as terrorists, thus subject to lethal force.

Lol

So if they lived in Chicago or Italy or Alaska

?

Same?
Notice that mentioning the Secretary of State is involved means Rightguide thinks his President and Secretary of State are just as culpable as the USA Ssecretary of War Crimes!
 
You're just making things worse for yourself. Now you're saying, "Yeah, it was wrong, but we're going to get away with it and we're total hypocrites and just say war crimes are wrong but that's not something we actually believe!"
What war crimes? He didn't say it was wrong, he said it wasn't law. If a sub launches a torpedo at a frigate and it doesn't sink even if there is enemy in the water the rules of engagement is to continue to fire until the threat is eliminated. The boat incident the terrorists on the boat were sending radio communications to surrounding druggies, probably an attempt to save some cargo. The boat wasn't sunk hence a double tap. Eliminate the threat and eliminate the cargo. Maybe they should have waited for druggies to save them then take them both out.


I can assure you if Biden would have taken the initiative and eliminated the drug boat the political hack from Connecticut would have declared Biden a national hero and declared a fucking national holiday.

The leftist lunes on lit have criticized Trump on every single issue. Like this fake selective outrage should be taken seriously.
 
Uh oh.

Looks like Kegsbreath is a weak leader and his subordinate made an executive kill decision without his blessing.

Court Martial them both.
 
Back
Top