Venezuela

[DeluxAuto]

So you couldn't refute the Constitution or SCOTUS....and are trying to act like you did.

You can't even cite the law you think Trump broke LOL

But you know he did!!! DAMN THE CONSTITUTION AND SCOTUS!!!! They don't matter when your fee fees are on the line!!!

Typical.

I didn't try to refute the Constitution. I asked you to show me on your PDF where it says what you wish it said.

I held your feet to the fire, and you went up in flames like the dumb flammable bitch you are.

 

[HisArpy]

I didn't try to refute the Constitution. I asked you to show me on your PDF where it says what you wish it said.

I held your feet to the fire, and you went up in flames like the dumb flammable bitch you are.

dudly, he burned your sorry ass to a crisp without half trying.

 

[ll74]

dudly, he burned your sorry ass to a crisp without half trying.

So you want to provide the citation that they haven't?

 

[DeluxAuto]

dudly, he burned your sorry ass to a crisp without half trying.

Quit cheerleading for ignorant MAGAts, ignorant MAGAt.

You're debasing yourself because I hurt your feelings. Grow a pair, loser.

 

[icanhelp1]

OH weep and wail for the terrorist!!! It's the democrat way....they don't like seeing their comrades attack on the USA fail.

Additional evidence states that there were radio transmissions coming from the boat after the hit which the boat was not totally destroyed. NPR and WAPO running opinion pieces based on anonymous sources. More TDS on steroids. Jack Keene wouldn't lie to the American people. More lying by omission!

 

[Chadrone]

I didn't try to refute the Constitution.

Then you understand Trump didn't break any law and all your wailing and teeth gnashing about it was TDS bullshit.

Good for you.

I asked you to show me on your PDF where it says what you wish it said.

I understand you want me to play fetch forever because you can't actually argue your position, ya just got a bunch of fee fees because CNN/MSNBC fed you bullshit and you lapped it up.

I held your feet to the fire, and you went up in flames like the dumb flammable bitch you are.

Then what law did Trump break??

You got REKT son.....so badly you went full meltdown in my vanity thread that I triggered your (D)umb fuck comrades into after I dragged them all over a half dozen threads before the sun was even up, just like I did you.

 

[Chadrone]

Additional evidence states that there were radio transmissions coming from the boat after the hit which the boat was not totally destroyed. NPR and WAPO running opinion pieces based on anonymous sources. More TDS on steroids. Jack Keene wouldn't lie to the American people. More lying by omission!

As long as the trigger was pulled before crossing the "line of advancement" meaning we didn't turn around for a 2nd pass?? It's all good as far as the GC. Unless specifically ordered otherwise, follow up shots are 100% legal.

The only real issue here is that Democrats are mad their comrades/money train got smoked and their voters are pissed about the price of coke going up.

 

[Rotadom]

 

[icanhelp1]

As long as the trigger was pulled before crossing the "line of advancement" meaning we didn't turn around for a 2nd pass?? It's all good as far as the GC. Unless specifically ordered otherwise, follow up shots are 100% legal.

The only real issue here is that Democrats are mad their comrades/money train got smoked and their voters are pissed about the price of coke going up.

Hunter must be feeling the pinch!

 

[DeluxAuto]

I understand you want me to play fetch

No, I don't, lil Chihuahua. I want you to show the class where on the PDF you posted answers the direct question I posed to you.

I wouldn't ask a dipshit like you to achieve any greater goal.

 

[ll74]

Additional evidence states that there were radio transmissions coming from the boat after the hit which the boat was not totally destroyed. NPR and WAPO running opinion pieces based on anonymous sources. More TDS on steroids. Jack Keene wouldn't lie to the American people. More lying by omission!

When was that information released?

 

[icanhelp1]

When was that information released?

AI overview;

The U.S. military reportedly intercepted a radio transmission from one of the survivors of a suspected drug boat that had been targeted in a September 2025 strike.
According to reports, U.S. officials said the U.S. military intercepted radio communications from one of the two survivors of an initial strike on a vessel, in which the survivor was allegedly radioing suspected cartel members for help. This communication, along with other intelligence, was considered by Admiral Frank Bradley in his decision to order a second, lethal strike on the vessel, which ultimately killed the survivors.

The existence and content of these intercepted communications are key points of interest for lawmakers, who have requested them as part of ongoing oversight investigations into the legality of the U.S. military's series of lethal strikes on suspected drug boats in the Caribbean and Pacific. The Trump administration has defended the strikes, arguing they have the legal authority to use lethal force against drug cartels it considers "enemy" combatants in a "non-international armed conflict".

Survivors of boat strike were actively continuing drug mission ...
Dec 2, 2025 — Bradley, in making his decision, considered that other “enemy” vessels were nearby and that the survivors were believed...

It was also stated on Megyn Kelly podcast

 

[ll74]

AI overview;

The U.S. military reportedly intercepted a radio transmission from one of the survivors of a suspected drug boat that had been targeted in a September 2025 strike.
According to reports, U.S. officials said the U.S. military intercepted radio communications from one of the two survivors of an initial strike on a vessel, in which the survivor was allegedly radioing suspected cartel members for help. This communication, along with other intelligence, was considered by Admiral Frank Bradley in his decision to order a second, lethal strike on the vessel, which ultimately killed the survivors.

The existence and content of these intercepted communications are key points of interest for lawmakers, who have requested them as part of ongoing oversight investigations into the legality of the U.S. military's series of lethal strikes on suspected drug boats in the Caribbean and Pacific. The Trump administration has defended the strikes, arguing they have the legal authority to use lethal force against drug cartels it considers "enemy" combatants in a "non-international armed conflict".

Survivors of boat strike were actively continuing drug mission ...
Dec 2, 2025 — Bradley, in making his decision, considered that other “enemy” vessels were nearby and that the survivors were believed...

It was also stated on Megyn Kelly podcast

So it was released in response to the accusations

Thanks for confirming.

I'm sure pets in Springfield are safe.

Also ....megyn Kelly already sold her soul.

 

[DeluxAuto]

in his decision to order a second, lethal strike on the vessel, which ultimately killed the survivors

War crime. Get it now?

Survivors of boat strike were actively continuing drug mission ...

How the fuck did they do that?

It was also stated on Megyn Kelly podcast

Like you, she's a pedo supporter.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Bombshell Report Undercuts Pete Hegseth’s Main Defense for Boat Strike

The report shows Pete Hegseth had a direct hand in making key decisions on the strikes.

The Defense Department’s decision to kill the two survivors of a boat bombing in the Caribbean Sea—which may very well be a war crime—was all part of Secretary Pete Hegseth’s contingency plan, The New York Times reported.

The Hegseth-approved plan involved rescuing any helpless survivors and killing them if they tried to contact a “cartel” member. The Defense Department is alleging that the men killed on September 2 did the latter, initiating the second half of the contingency plan.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Hunter must be feeling the pinch!

There's video of Donnie Jr doing coke and Kegsbreath is a drunkard.

 

[Rebel5soul]

The results of the unofficial straw poll is in, 62% of sharks prefer their narco-terrorists raw. US SOCOM has announced that their strike options are under review.

 

[DeluxAuto]

The results of the unofficial straw poll is in, 62% of sharks prefer their narco-terrorists raw. US SOCOM has announced that their strike options are under review.

'murica. Fuck yeah!

 

[icanhelp1]

Bombshell Report Undercuts Pete Hegseth’s Main Defense for Boat Strike

The report shows Pete Hegseth had a direct hand in making key decisions on the strikes.

The Defense Department’s decision to kill the two survivors of a boat bombing in the Caribbean Sea—which may very well be a war crime—was all part of Secretary Pete Hegseth’s contingency plan, The New York Times reported.

The Hegseth-approved plan involved rescuing any helpless survivors and killing them if they tried to contact a “cartel” member. The Defense Department is alleging that the men killed on September 2 did the latter, initiating the second half of the contingency plan.

Overview​

Ad Fontes Media rates New Republic in the Strong Left category of bias and as Mixed Reliability/Opinion OR Other Issues in terms of reliability. New Republic is an editorial magazine and website based in New York City that focuses on politics, culture and the arts. It was founded in 1914, advocating for “liberal reform in a new industrial age.”

Overall Score​

The following are the overall bias and reliability scores for New Republic according to our Ad Fontes Media ratings methodology.

Reliability: 30.03

Bias: -16.63

Panels of analysts from Ad Fontes Media regularly review representative sample content to rate it for reliability and bias. Each panel of analysts comprises one left-leaning, one right-leaning, and one center-leaning analyst.

The team considers a variety of factors when rating content. To determine its reliability score, we consider the content’s veracity, expression, its title/headline, and graphics. We add each of these scores to the chart on a weighted scale, with the average of those creating the sample content’s overall reliability score.

To determine sample content’s bias score, we consider its language, its political position, and how it compares to other reporting or analysis from other sources on the same topic. We add each of these scores to the chart on a weighted scale, with the average of those creating the content’s overall bias score.

The bias rating, demonstrated on the Media Bias Chart on the horizontal axis, ranges from most extreme left to middle to most extreme right. The reliability rating, demonstrated on the chart’s vertical axis, rates sources on a scale from original fact reporting to analysis, opinion, propaganda and inaccurate/fabricated information.

Reliability scores for articles and shows are on a scale of 0-64. Scores above 40 are generally good; scores below 24 are generally problematic. Scores between 24-40 indicate a range of possibilities, with some sources falling there because they are heavy in opinion and analysis, and some because they have a high variation in reliability between articles.

Bias scores for articles and shows are on a scale of -42 to +42, with higher negative scores being more left, higher positive scores being more right, and scores closer to zero being minimally biased, equally balanced, or exhibiting a centrist bias.

 

[Hel_Books]

DeluxAuto said:
Bombshell Report Undercuts Pete Hegseth’s Main Defense for Boat Strike

The report shows Pete Hegseth had a direct hand in making key decisions on the strikes.

The Defense Department’s decision to kill the two survivors of a boat bombing in the Caribbean Sea—which may very well be a war crime—was all part of Secretary Pete Hegseth’s contingency plan, The New York Times reported.

The Hegseth-approved plan involved rescuing any helpless survivors and killing them if they tried to contact a “cartel” member. The Defense Department is alleging that the men killed on September 2 did the latter, initiating the second half of the contingency plan.

Overview​

Ad Fontes Media rates New Republic in the Strong Left category of bias . . .

So, you don't have any actual information to dispute the news story? Isn't that an admission that you believe your Ssecretary of War Crimes ordered the murder of two people clinging to wreckage floating in the sea?

 

[icanhelp1]

So, you don't have any actual information to dispute the news story? Isn't that an admission that you believe your Ssecretary of War Crimes ordered the murder of two people clinging to wreckage floating in the sea?

It’s not a news story, it’s an opinion piece published by a left leaning rag. Ret General Jack Keene agreed that the hit was legal. I’ll take his word for it. Megyn Kelly interviewed a Jag officer who also agreed that the evidence appears to justify a strike based on radio transmissions alerting nearby druggies to come to their rescue. The congressional opinions for the most part will be along party lines and will prove nothing. Obama wrote the book on drone strikes.

 

[Chadrone]

No, I don't, lil Chihuahua. I want you to show the class where on the PDF you posted answers the direct question I posed to you.

I wouldn't ask a dipshit like you to achieve any greater goal.

What law dipshit??

What law do you think Trump broke smoking your terrorist buddies??

Or is just rambling like some cartoon villan all you've got?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Overview​

Ad Fontes Media rates New Republic in the Strong Left category of bias and as Mixed Reliability/Opinion OR Other Issues in terms of reliability. New Republic is an editorial magazine and website based in New York City that focuses on politics, culture and the arts. It was founded in 1914, advocating for “liberal reform in a new industrial age.”

Overall Score​

The following are the overall bias and reliability scores for New Republic according to our Ad Fontes Media ratings methodology.

Reliability: 30.03

Bias: -16.63

Panels of analysts from Ad Fontes Media regularly review representative sample content to rate it for reliability and bias. Each panel of analysts comprises one left-leaning, one right-leaning, and one center-leaning analyst.

The team considers a variety of factors when rating content. To determine its reliability score, we consider the content’s veracity, expression, its title/headline, and graphics. We add each of these scores to the chart on a weighted scale, with the average of those creating the sample content’s overall reliability score.

To determine sample content’s bias score, we consider its language, its political position, and how it compares to other reporting or analysis from other sources on the same topic. We add each of these scores to the chart on a weighted scale, with the average of those creating the content’s overall bias score.

The bias rating, demonstrated on the Media Bias Chart on the horizontal axis, ranges from most extreme left to middle to most extreme right. The reliability rating, demonstrated on the chart’s vertical axis, rates sources on a scale from original fact reporting to analysis, opinion, propaganda and inaccurate/fabricated information.

Reliability scores for articles and shows are on a scale of 0-64. Scores above 40 are generally good; scores below 24 are generally problematic. Scores between 24-40 indicate a range of possibilities, with some sources falling there because they are heavy in opinion and analysis, and some because they have a high variation in reliability between articles.

Bias scores for articles and shows are on a scale of -42 to +42, with higher negative scores being more left, higher positive scores being more right, and scores closer to zero being minimally biased, equally balanced, or exhibiting a centrist bias.

They weren't the source, histrionic illiterate dummy.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
So, you don't have any actual information to dispute the news story? Isn't that an admission that you believe your Ssecretary of War Crimes ordered the murder of two people clinging to wreckage floating in the sea?

It’s not a news story, it’s an opinion piece published by a left leaning rag

If you disagree with someone's politics and they tell you it's raining, all the screaming you might do that the sun is shining (when it isn't) won't make the rain stop. You've agreed that the boat was blown up by a drone from the USA military, with a follow-up strike that killed two people clinging to wreckage floating in the sea.

The Law of War Manual used by your own country explains on page 453, “After each engagement, parties to the conflict shall, without delay, take all possible measures to search for and collect the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked at sea, to protect them against pillage and ill-treatment, to ensure their adequate care, and to search for the dead and prevent their being despoiled.”

 

[Chadrone]

If you disagree with someone's politics and they tell you it's raining, all the screaming you might do that the sun is shining (when it isn't) won't make the rain stop. You've agreed that the boat was blown up by a drone from the USA military, with a follow-up strike that killed two people clinging to wreckage floating in the sea.

The Law of War Manual used by your own country explains on page 453, “After each engagement, parties to the conflict shall, without delay, take all possible measures to search for and collect the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked at sea, to protect them against pillage and ill-treatment, to ensure their adequate care, and to search for the dead and prevent their being despoiled.”

LOL...the law of war we put forth for other nations as part of the UN.

That thing is not the ROE, nor is it any actual law.

Besides, laws only matter if they are enforced. Democrats taught us that. Best of luck impeaching and removing Trump for that.