Vega vs Tokoh: Or Miranda Rights aren't your rights

There was a case about 20 years ago where Rehnquist said, in effect, "You know, I didn't really think much of Miranda when it came down, but bottom line is it's now firmly entrenched in American life and we're not going to mess with it now."

There's now a majority on the Court more far right than Rehnquist, who once argued against Brown v. Board.
 
Police want to be held unaccountable. It is all part of the Fascist Police State
 
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-499_gfbh.pdf
apparently you can no long sue police officers for violating your Miranda Rights.
This one snuck in under the radar, You know who voted which way so when you hear Conservatives bragging about small and limited government. . .just know they are liars.
Sorry, but that isn't what it was about. Because of qualified immunity and other laws, there wasn't a right to sue over violation of Miranda Rights in the first place. This ruling simply says there definitely isn't one. Not receiving a Miranda warning when arrested will still cause anything the arrested says to be barred from use as evidence.

We have a lot bigger fish to fry no one has taken notice of like the erosion of the separation of church and state (religious schools receiving government money) than this.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/gover...oney-religious-schools-maine-case-2022-06-21/

Comshaw
 
Back
Top