thebullet
Rebel without applause
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2003
- Posts
- 1,247
Nov 28 2004
US uses banned weapon... but was Tony Blair told?
By Paul Gilfeather, Political Editor
http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=14920109&method=full&siteid=106694&
headline=fallujah-napalmed-name_page.html
US troops are secretly using outlawed napalm gas to wipe
out remaining insurgents in and around Fallujah.
News that President George W. Bush has sanctioned the use
of napalm, a deadly cocktail of polystyrene and jet fuel
banned by the United Nations in 1980, will stun governments
around the world.
And last night Tony Blair was dragged into the row as furious Labour MPs demanded he face the Commons over it.
Reports claim that innocent civilians have died in napalm
attacks, which turn victims into human fireballs as the gel
bonds flames to flesh.
Outraged critics have also demanded that Mr Blair threatens
to withdraw British troops from Iraq unless the US abandons
one of the world's most reviled weapons. Halifax Labour MP
Alice Mahon said: "I am calling on Mr Blair to make an emergency statement to the Commons to explain why this is happening. It begs the question: 'Did we know about this hideous weapon's use in Iraq?'"
Since the American assault on Fallujah there have been reports of "melted" corpses, which appeared to have napalm injuries.
Last August the US was forced to admit using the gas in Iraq.
A 1980 UN convention banned the use of napalm against
civilians - after pictures of a naked girl victim fleeing in Vietnam shocked the world.
America, which didn't ratify the treaty, is the only country in the world still using the weapon.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2003-08/10/article10.shtml
U.S. Admits Using Napalm Bombs In Iraq: Report
"The U.S. is the only country that has used napalm for a
long time. I am not aware of any other country that uses
it," Pike
WASHINGTON, August 10 (IslamOnline.net & News
Agencies) - The United States admitted dropping the
internationally-banned incendiary weapon of napalm on
Iraq, despite earlier denials by the Pentagon that the
"horrible" weapon had not been used in the three-week invasion.
An upgraded type of the weapon, a terrifying mixture of jet
fuel and polystyrene that sticks to skin as it burns, was
used in March and April 2003, when dozens of napalm bombs
were dropped near bridges over the Saddam Canal and the
Tigris river, south of Baghdad, the Independent reported
Sunday, August 10.
"We napalmed both those [bridge] approaches," the paper
quoted Colonel James Alles, commander of Marine Air Group
11, as saying.
"Unfortunately there were people there ... you could see
them in the [cockpit] video. They were Iraqi soldiers. It's no great way to die," said Alles. On March 22 a correspondent for Sydney Morning Herald, traveling with U.S. marines reported that napalm was used in an attack on Iraqi troops at Safwan Hill, near the Kuwait border.
His account was based on statements by two U.S. marines
officers on the ground.
"Safwan Hill went up in a huge fireball and the observation post was obliterated. I pity anyone who is in there," a Marine sergeant said
The Pentagon insisted at the time the statement was "patently false".
"The U.S. took napalm out of service in the 1970s. We completed the destruction of our last batch of napalm on April 4, 2001, and no longer maintain any stocks of napalm," Lieutenant-Commander Jeff Davis, from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Defense had said.
'Generals Love Napalm'
But a Pentagon official told Agence France-Presse (AFP) on
Thursday that U.S. forces used the new type against Iraqi
forces in their drive towards Baghdad and defended their
use as legal and necessary.
The official, who did not wish to be identified, said that U.S. marines jets dropped the fire bombs at least once to destroy Iraqi positions at Safwan.
"It is like this: you've got [an] enemy that's hard to get at. And it will save your own lives to use it. There were no international conventions against it, the official said.
Marines used the bombs on at least two other occasions during the drive to Baghdad, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported this week.
"The generals love napalm… it has a big psychological effect," the paper quoted Alles as saying.
Marine Corps Maj-Gen Jim Amos confirmed to the paper that
napalm was used on several occasions in the invasion.
A 1980 U.N. convention banned the use against civilian targets of napalm. The U.S., which did not sign the treaty, is one of the few countries that makes use of the weapon, as it was employed notoriously against both civilian and military targets in the Vietnam war, according to the Independent.
The revelation that napalm was used in the invasion of Iraq, while the Pentagon denied it, has outraged opponents of the war.
"Most of the world understands that napalm and incendiaries
are a horrible, horrible weapon," Robert Musil, director of the organization Physicians for Social Responsibility, told the British paper.
"It takes up an awful lot of medical resources. It creates horrible wounds." Musil said denial of its use "fits a pattern of deception [by the U.S. administration]".
It Is Still Napalm
The Pentagon said it had not tried to deceive. It drew a
distinction between traditional napalm, first invented in
1942, and the weapons dropped in Iraq, which it calls Mark
77 firebombs. They weigh 510lbs, and consist of 44lbs of
polystyrene-like gel and 63 gallons of jet fuel.
John Pike, director of the military studies group lobalSecurity.Org, said: "You can call it something other than napalm but it is still napalm. It has been reformulated in the sense that they now use a different petroleum distillate, but that is it. The U.S. is the only country that has used napalm for a long time. I am not aware of any other country that uses it."
Musil said the Pentagon's effort to draw a distinction between the weapons was outrageous.
"It's Orwellian. They do not want the public to know. It's a lie," he said.
After the offensive on Iraq ended, Iraqis began to complain
about unexploded cluster bombs that still litter the r
areas and the U.S. forces failed to take them away.
US uses banned weapon... but was Tony Blair told?
By Paul Gilfeather, Political Editor
http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=14920109&method=full&siteid=106694&
headline=fallujah-napalmed-name_page.html
US troops are secretly using outlawed napalm gas to wipe
out remaining insurgents in and around Fallujah.
News that President George W. Bush has sanctioned the use
of napalm, a deadly cocktail of polystyrene and jet fuel
banned by the United Nations in 1980, will stun governments
around the world.
And last night Tony Blair was dragged into the row as furious Labour MPs demanded he face the Commons over it.
Reports claim that innocent civilians have died in napalm
attacks, which turn victims into human fireballs as the gel
bonds flames to flesh.
Outraged critics have also demanded that Mr Blair threatens
to withdraw British troops from Iraq unless the US abandons
one of the world's most reviled weapons. Halifax Labour MP
Alice Mahon said: "I am calling on Mr Blair to make an emergency statement to the Commons to explain why this is happening. It begs the question: 'Did we know about this hideous weapon's use in Iraq?'"
Since the American assault on Fallujah there have been reports of "melted" corpses, which appeared to have napalm injuries.
Last August the US was forced to admit using the gas in Iraq.
A 1980 UN convention banned the use of napalm against
civilians - after pictures of a naked girl victim fleeing in Vietnam shocked the world.
America, which didn't ratify the treaty, is the only country in the world still using the weapon.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2003-08/10/article10.shtml
U.S. Admits Using Napalm Bombs In Iraq: Report
"The U.S. is the only country that has used napalm for a
long time. I am not aware of any other country that uses
it," Pike
WASHINGTON, August 10 (IslamOnline.net & News
Agencies) - The United States admitted dropping the
internationally-banned incendiary weapon of napalm on
Iraq, despite earlier denials by the Pentagon that the
"horrible" weapon had not been used in the three-week invasion.
An upgraded type of the weapon, a terrifying mixture of jet
fuel and polystyrene that sticks to skin as it burns, was
used in March and April 2003, when dozens of napalm bombs
were dropped near bridges over the Saddam Canal and the
Tigris river, south of Baghdad, the Independent reported
Sunday, August 10.
"We napalmed both those [bridge] approaches," the paper
quoted Colonel James Alles, commander of Marine Air Group
11, as saying.
"Unfortunately there were people there ... you could see
them in the [cockpit] video. They were Iraqi soldiers. It's no great way to die," said Alles. On March 22 a correspondent for Sydney Morning Herald, traveling with U.S. marines reported that napalm was used in an attack on Iraqi troops at Safwan Hill, near the Kuwait border.
His account was based on statements by two U.S. marines
officers on the ground.
"Safwan Hill went up in a huge fireball and the observation post was obliterated. I pity anyone who is in there," a Marine sergeant said
The Pentagon insisted at the time the statement was "patently false".
"The U.S. took napalm out of service in the 1970s. We completed the destruction of our last batch of napalm on April 4, 2001, and no longer maintain any stocks of napalm," Lieutenant-Commander Jeff Davis, from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Defense had said.
'Generals Love Napalm'
But a Pentagon official told Agence France-Presse (AFP) on
Thursday that U.S. forces used the new type against Iraqi
forces in their drive towards Baghdad and defended their
use as legal and necessary.
The official, who did not wish to be identified, said that U.S. marines jets dropped the fire bombs at least once to destroy Iraqi positions at Safwan.
"It is like this: you've got [an] enemy that's hard to get at. And it will save your own lives to use it. There were no international conventions against it, the official said.
Marines used the bombs on at least two other occasions during the drive to Baghdad, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported this week.
"The generals love napalm… it has a big psychological effect," the paper quoted Alles as saying.
Marine Corps Maj-Gen Jim Amos confirmed to the paper that
napalm was used on several occasions in the invasion.
A 1980 U.N. convention banned the use against civilian targets of napalm. The U.S., which did not sign the treaty, is one of the few countries that makes use of the weapon, as it was employed notoriously against both civilian and military targets in the Vietnam war, according to the Independent.
The revelation that napalm was used in the invasion of Iraq, while the Pentagon denied it, has outraged opponents of the war.
"Most of the world understands that napalm and incendiaries
are a horrible, horrible weapon," Robert Musil, director of the organization Physicians for Social Responsibility, told the British paper.
"It takes up an awful lot of medical resources. It creates horrible wounds." Musil said denial of its use "fits a pattern of deception [by the U.S. administration]".
It Is Still Napalm
The Pentagon said it had not tried to deceive. It drew a
distinction between traditional napalm, first invented in
1942, and the weapons dropped in Iraq, which it calls Mark
77 firebombs. They weigh 510lbs, and consist of 44lbs of
polystyrene-like gel and 63 gallons of jet fuel.
John Pike, director of the military studies group lobalSecurity.Org, said: "You can call it something other than napalm but it is still napalm. It has been reformulated in the sense that they now use a different petroleum distillate, but that is it. The U.S. is the only country that has used napalm for a long time. I am not aware of any other country that uses it."
Musil said the Pentagon's effort to draw a distinction between the weapons was outrageous.
"It's Orwellian. They do not want the public to know. It's a lie," he said.
After the offensive on Iraq ended, Iraqis began to complain
about unexploded cluster bombs that still litter the r
areas and the U.S. forces failed to take them away.
