US deal with Taliban.

[Spinaroonie]

As it turns out my accusations were right. The US was dealing with the Taliban to create an oil pipline across afghanistan. In fact, the US was dealing with the 'ban in Sept, and even told the FBI to scale back on it's investigation on Al Qaeda to help the pipeline go through.

Ever wonder why we gave impossible demands to the 'ban? (Anyone legitimately think they had the power to give him up? Osama could give the Taliban to somebody, but not the other way around. The way the US asked us to do it was asking for me to turn my governor in to the French gov't) Anyone wonder why the gov't was so focused on including the words "And the gov'ts that harbor those evildoers".

Why? Because we have a leader who's whole family owes everything they have to oil, and they'll be damned if they don't have to pay part of it back every chance they get.

And before anyone compalins, I even have a source: http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0201/08/ltm.05.html

 

[lyceus69]

US/UK are worst than Taliban

Why do I say that? Because Taliban aren't hypocrites, they aren't hiding behind something that they are not. UK and US are just false, using 'human rights' etc to bomb civilians. I would back any govt that fights terrorism, but not if it means killing (even inadvertently) civilians.

 

[fgarvb1]

Damn them EVIL americans (usa)

they are at it again!

Did it ever occur to you that a lot of things happen in the world at the same time? And just because someone is writting a book doesn't make what they write true.

I don't know about you, But if i had control of a country and was going to get a shit pot load of money as well as control of a lot of oil, the last thing i would do is go blow up buildings and kill a lot of people. At least until the pipeline was producing. Who was running the country, Who was in control? Who had what to gain in that country?

Did i miss something? If so, What?