chillywilly2
AKA Bean
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2002
- Posts
- 16,674
Drinking unpasturized milk should get you an automatic Darwin Award
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Drinking unpasturized milk should get you an automatic Darwin Award
I'm pretty sure I read some study showing that raw milk, provided it's not contaminated with e coli, etc., is actually better for peoples' immune systems.There is a school of thought out there presented by some pretty-well educated people that by trying to completely sanitize our world, we do our children's immune systems a grave disservice.
I'm pretty sure I read some study showing that raw milk, provided it's not contaminated with e coli, etc., is actually better for peoples' immune systems.
I think what is missed is that most of the contamination comes in the processing steps of food production, i.e., sloppy work.
I drank a lot of raw eggnog made from eggs from our chickens and raw milk from the farm.

I tried pulling out one once, but the hen didn't like it.And how rare is it to pull out an egg not covered in shit.

And how rare is it to pull out an egg not covered in shit.
As Candi said, they are nasty little things, although tasty. They taste a lot like 'Gator...
![]()
Ha.
right on cue.
I have had Roquefort, but not Stilton. I never realized it was from sheep's milk.
I don't think I have ever had proper mozzarella, isn't it supposed to be from water buffalo?
No, it just needs to be illegal. That's what makes it attractive for some people.See, you're not dead.
I still wouldn't give to my kid, but as an adult, I think that you should be able to drink it if you want it. What's the difference? In taste, I mean. It's gotta be damn good if people are willing to risk food poisoning AND do drug-deal type transactions to get it.
I think they do that on purpose with eggs. They're like, "I bet predators won't eat my kids if I cover them in shit."
No, it just needs to be illegal. That's what makes it attractive for some people.
There will always be schmoes who hunt out ways to get around rules and regulations, regardless of the costs and consequences, from Prohibition to Obamacare.
lol
I never thought of it that way...
It's a good strategy. Human babies cover themselves in shit. Inconvenient.
I first put 'convenient' and then.... it's just not. It's really not. I can't wait until she discovers that there's an alternative to shitting your pants. I think she'll take to it. Because she, like most children, hates being covered in shit and will scream about it until someone fixes it.
maybe it's really down to what it costs in terms of medical care for those who get sick, the dangers to the foetus if pregnant women eat unpasteurised milk-products (very very bad) and, overall, general standards of public health which (i'd imagine) are better for having the pasteurising process in place. maybe it's just about someone making money they'd rather not lose out on if things revert.
just went and took a look - it seems the restrictions are area/cultural specific, and that listeriosis isn't necessarily killed by pasteurisation. guess a whole lot depends on the kind of farming undertaken, how much good husbandry's involved compared to cost-cutting for profit. seems to me that if the standards are good and the food is clearly labelled as having used 'raw milk', and people are aware of the possible dangers, then it should be ok. since those three don't always come together in a neat package, safety has to be a concern.
Princess had a purple stool and a brown pencil.
When she put her stool behind my chair and climbed up on it with her brown pencil, I knew that I had about ten minutes and then it was time to deal with the least precious thing in my life.
![]()
Even dead possums were more fun to deal with.
PS - M&Ms work great for potty training when the time comes.
No, it just needs to be illegal. That's what makes it attractive for some people.
There will always be schmoes who hunt out ways to get around rules and regulations, regardless of the costs and consequences, from Prohibition to Obamacare.
The FDA says that since there's a small chance consuming raw milk will make you sick, it should therefore be illegal. However, they happily approve known carcinogens for daily consumption. Have you seen the list of crap that makes up the "food" at McDonalds or Burger King? If you look through the reasons people switch to "organic only" food, or the reasons for not eating processed food, it's enough to make you hurl. But raw milk? The FDA wants to ban that stuff, and launches SWAT raids on farmhouses for those drug-dealer farmers? Tobacco and alcohol are perfectly legal as well, and they have well-known dangers. But milk? Seriously?
I'm sure glad big brother is watching out for me so closely, dictating by law how they are protecting me. I don't know how people lived for thousands of years drinking that horrible raw milk stuff. In the US, it's been less than 100 years since pasteurized milk was common, then it was mandated for our own good.
In my state, we are lucky enough that we can legally buy raw milk in stores without it looking like drug deals. It's expensive and hard to find, but it is there. As long as proper cleanliness steps are taken, the risks of illness are low. I don't always buy it, but when I do it's a treat. It's kinda nice to get the vitamins naturally, instead of the stuff that has manufactured vitamins added back in after 99% of the good stuff is cooked away.
The government shouldn't be worrying about little stuff like this. Instead of being directed by the big industry lobbyists to kill off the competition, they should adhere to their charter. If they have the health of the citizens as their priority, they should focus more on getting rid of the truly bad crap that's in our food and stop trying to ban all the natural methods of eating (and health care, but that's another thread).
don't you think the differences in rearing dairy herds today compared with, say, when lots of homesteaders might have had a milker or had access to milk from a smallholding account for the reason the legislation was introduced?
in a well-run place where the feed is top quality and all the animals vetted regularly, the likelihood of unsafe milk is hugely reduced but never eliminated. what about the milk coming from places that cut corners? i think i'll stick with what i have to trust.
In Florida you can buy "Raw Milk" only for feeding Pets, that's the loophole. The modern Jihad started when some idiot fed a 23 month old kid raw milk and he got sick, which gave big dairy the excuse to scream " for the children".
I don't see what the bugaboo is, humans have been drinking raw milk since they first started milking animals. You take your chances, you might get sick from raw milk or you could eat a salad in a restaurant where the produce came from a farm were the pickers didn't wash their hands.
RAW MILK PRODUCERS PLEASE NOTE: The FDA and State Agencies have discovered this list and sometimes use it for their own purposes, so exercise caution with your listing. If you choose not to have a listing, make sure your local WAPF Chapter Leader has your name for referrals.

There is a school of thought out there presented by some pretty-well educated people that by trying to completely sanitize our world, we do our children's immune systems a grave disservice.
Drinking raw milk sure didn't kill me, it probably made me stronger.