Underage incest fantasys

[amicus]

My view is that the over 18 rule is to protect this site from any possible legislation against pornography in the US. There are many politicians and church groups there who would destroy all sexually-overt sites if they could. Having an over-18 rule makes Literotica less of a target.

Og

~~~

Rather the way of all things, doncha think, Ogg? An innovative entrepeneurship. becoming established, ceases to risk pushing the envelope, leaving the door open for more daring investors...?


One day Literotica will become second to first one, then many, that went just a little more into the future...such a deal...

Amicus...

 

[oggbashan]

~~~

Rather the way of all things, doncha think, Ogg? An innovative entrepeneurship. becoming established, ceases to risk pushing the envelope, leaving the door open for more daring investors...?


One day Literotica will become second to first one, then many, that went just a little more into the future...such a deal...

Amicus...

Management of any enterprise includes managing risk and deciding what is an acceptable level of risk.

I think that Literotica has chosen a sensible policy. There are other sites that allow any form of erotica but I don't think any of them can be compared to this one for number of members and the amount of participation.

Deciding where your market is and sticking with it is a good policy. There are many examples of trying to extend beyond your market and failing, and to be fair to you, also examples of staying with your chosen market long after it becomes unviable. One of our local firms still produces "Gentleman's Hair Pomade" - nearly a century after it became unfashionable. They still survive but their market has shrunk to very small proportions yet it is large enough for the firm to continue operating.

Og

 

[amicus]

Yes, GM, never ever thought that Toyota would ever garner a market share, strange world, ain't it?

 

[SlickTony]

One of our local firms still produces "Gentleman's Hair Pomade" - nearly a century after it became unfashionable. They still survive but their market has shrunk to very small proportions yet it is large enough for the firm to continue operating.

Quite so. Every now and then I see bottles of Brilliantine offered for sale at the drugstore, and most south Asian grocery stores feature coconut oil for the hair, although I doubt that anyone in the present generation would be caught dead using it.

I try to avoid directly mentioning ages in any of the stories I write, and the fact that nowadays, most young people acquire sexual experience earlier than 18--and sometimes earlier than 16--is the reason I made the one first time story I've written a period piece.

 

[shereads]

Having just consumed this thread in one sitting, all I can add is this:

I'm so grateful my dad wasn't a sicko.

Edited to add:

And this:

Those who think Literotica should take more chances might want to put their money where their big mouths are, and pony up a legal-fees trust fund. It's not your neck on the line; you're just taking advantage of someone else's investment and risk.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Having just consumed this thread in one sitting, all I can add is this:

I'm so grateful my dad wasn't a sicko.

Edited to add:

And this:

Those who think Literotica should take more chances might want to put their money where their big mouths are, and pony up a legal-fees trust fund. It's not your neck on the line; you're just taking advantage of someone else's investment and risk.

It's easier than that: anyone who doesn't like Lit's restrictions can set up their own site that plays by their own rules.

 

[Guest]

. . . . .

 

[Stella_Omega]

Yeah.

And neener neener, too.

I got a brand new pair of roller skates, you got a brand new key...

 

[Guest]

. . . . .

 

[Stella_Omega]

I think that we should get together and try them out you see

 

[Boxlicker101]

Quite so. Every now and then I see bottles of Brilliantine offered for sale at the drugstore, and most south Asian grocery stores feature coconut oil for the hair, although I doubt that anyone in the present generation would be caught dead using it.

I try to avoid directly mentioning ages in any of the stories I write, and the fact that nowadays, most young people acquire sexual experience earlier than 18--and sometimes earlier than 16--is the reason I made the one first time story I've written a period piece.

There are other products offered for sale that have a limited market but, as long as enough sales are made for the manufacturer to show a profit, they will continue to offer them. I shave with cup soap and have done so for almost 47 years. When I started, a bar or disk cost ten cents, and it now costs about $1.50. Even so, it's a better deal than any similar product I know of, and it gives me a better shave, so I will continue to use it, as long as it is available. I wonder how many other people in the USA use this product.

ETA: how did this thread get so totally hijacked to go from underage sex and incest to personal care products with limited demand?

 

[cantdog]

I certainly hope so, Box.

 

[amicus]

"You got a brand new pair of roller skates!" !!!!


Nobody, buy nobody, but me knows that song! You been snoopin' in my music files??? HUh? Huh?

I hope you find 'Spiders and Snakes" in your frosted flakes!

ahem...

Amicus...

 

[Selena_Kitt]

I hope you find 'Spiders and Snakes" in your frosted flakes!

"Cuz that's not what it takes to love me..."

 

[amicus]

"The way I want to be loved by you..."

(ah thinks ahm in luv)

 

[shereads]

ETA: how did this thread get so totally hijacked to go from underage sex and incest to personal care products with limited demand?

You're right. Personal Care Products was supposed to have become the next sub-topic at the Amazing Sea Monkeys thread. What's it doing here?

 

[rgraham666]

You're right. Personal Care Products was supposed to have become the next sub-topic at the Amazing Sea Monkeys thread. What's it doing here?

My bad.

I misread the memo. Something about my brain has difficulty understanding memos.

 

[Lalah]

There's sometimg that get to me in this thread, and maybe I'm just getting a bad impression, but I don't think so.

From the comments I've read, there seem the be the assumption underage sex is bad. That it's sick, painful, emotionally crippling and that you need support from your parents to get trough that.

Jeez, what kind of first experience did you guys get? My first experience was great and made me feel some very strong positive emotions. You guys are talking as if underage sex was a brutal rape. Teenagers are having sex every day and the earth is still turning.

On the same token, you all seem to assume incest would have to be against someone's will. What's to say the younger party couldn't be the one pushing things forward and wanting this? If a sixteen year old girl or boy manage to seduce one of his/her relative and they have a non-abusive relationship, I wont judge them. I know a girl who married a 27 years old guy when she was 16. Granted they were not related, but they've been happily married for the last ten years and she's a perfectly emotionally balanced woman who wouldn't appreciate you judging her choice.

Yes rape is bad, emotional abuse is bad. But sex itself is never bad unless you make it so. The truth is teenagers have sex, and no matter what we'd like to say about it teenagers will keep having sex. Do we really need to put external pressures on them? Shouldn't we let them come to this with their own emotions and needs instead of with the issues of people telling them it's wrong and scaring them away from it "for their own good"? THAT in my opinion is emotional abuse, pushing your own emotions on someone else before they get the chance to make their own mind.

Edit: Shit sorry. I saw someone link to this thread from an active thread, checked the 2008 date and assumed it was still active, I didn't realize it had been inactive for close to two months.

 

[champagne1982]

Sex, when experienced too soon, ie before both mind and body are mature enough to handle the physical and emotional changes, can be extremely damaging.

Just because Janey wants to smoke a cigarette, doesn't mean Daddy or Mommy should give it to them. So, the way I read it, besides the inherent genetic difficulties a child of incest may bear, a caring parent wouldn't expose their child to inappropriate sexual contact, no matter how old that son or daughter is or how much their offspring would like to experience it.

 

[Lalah]

Sex, when experienced too soon, ie before both mind and body are mature enough to handle the physical and emotional changes, can be extremely damaging.

Just because Janey wants to smoke a cigarette, doesn't mean Daddy or Mommy should give it to them. So, the way I read it, besides the inherent genetic difficulties a child of incest may bear, a caring parent wouldn't expose their child to inappropriate sexual contact, no matter how old that son or daughter is or how much their offspring would like to experience it.

Ah but you're assuming there's a magical age where maturity come overnight. The legal age vary from country to country, who's to say your variation of it is right and that other country is wrong? The truth is that there are no magical age and no one mature at the same rate.

You're saying people shouldn't have sex before they can handle the emotional change. Well the teenage years is when emotional changes take place; people create their new adult personality. Sounds like just the time to have those emotional changes, not when the person is already adult and has already developed their adult personality. A personality that isn't equipped to deal with sex and is at this point hard to change.

Most of the issues and apprehension teens have over sex - issues that can make their first experience a bad one and permanently shade their whole view of themselves and sexuality - come from other people feeding it to them before they can try for themselves. How can someone mature emotionally if they are not given the opportunity to experience by themselves? So two teens get together one day and fondle each others. What's the big deal? This won't destroy their psyche, they'll actually get some valuable emotional experience out of it. Can some bad feelings ever come out of it? Of course, it has to happen sometimes. But someone who has been sheltered and hasn't learned to deal with these emotions is not a mature individual, he's a crippled individual with important tools missing.

The teenage years is the phase where most people's get their social identity. By repressing them and their sexual desires, we're just crippling them emotionally by attaching negative feelings and emotions on something that should be positive and by preventing them from learning how to deal with this.

Is it such a wonder there are so many sexual deviants and so many people with issues related to sexuality, if they have never been given the right and the opportunity to learn about it when they were building their social and personal image of themselves? You're supposed to experiment life in your teenage years, not when you're 30 and sexually repressed.

 

[Stella_Omega]

From the comments I've read, there seem the be the assumption underage sex is bad. That it's sick, painful, emotionally crippling and that you need support from your parents to get trough that.

The subject was very young underage... Not 16-year-olds, or even 14, but young. And also, the original topic was incest-- my wonderful sexual experiences as a teen had nothing to do with my father, and, given the state of our society, and the strong human tendency of authority figures to slip into abuse-- I cannot imagine any possibility of father-daughter incest being a positive experience.

As far as underage sex in of itself, some people's assumption seems to be that the law's choices are magically correct-- like you, I think that's preposterous.

Edit: Shit sorry. I saw someone link to this thread from an active thread, checked the 2008 date and assumed it was still active, I didn't realize it had been inactive for close to two months.

BWAH! That's how the thread came up in the first place!

 

[Lalah]

I agree father daughter incest is doomed to fail if it keep the parent/child dynamic. My father has been lusting after me for years and I gave it some serious thoughts, but I do not think my father could let go of the authority, so it won't happen, sadly.

 

[Selena_Kitt]

The subject was very young underage... Not 16-year-olds, or even 14, but young.

actually that wasn't what the original poster said... they didn't specify. They just said "underage." Although we did touch on the topic of VERY young underage sex and I don't remember anyone here saying that was okay.

 

[SlickTony]

Yes, I think what people are kicking about is the absurd idea that if you turn 18 on May 1, on April 30, you were too young for sex and it would damage you. But it's also been determined that the Lit rule is a polite legal fiction, insurance againt the forces that would shut this place down if they could.

 

[Ash1221]

Sometimes it's the most taboo fantasies that turn us on the most.

But, I think there are some fantasies (especially underage sex - whether you are the girl or not), that should not be revealed. Certainly not in the context of erotic fiction. I think we're in danger of normalising such things if we go down that path.

I'm not being a prude because I'm very against censorship in most respects.

rachel
xox

can we discuss incest i agree with u as a boy no holds barred