BiBunny
Moon Queen & Wanderer
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2005
- Posts
- 12,158
Okey dokey, I decided I'd hijacked Sir W's poly thread too much with my musings, so I thought I'd start my own. I'm going to post snippets from that thread in this one for brevity, but go here if you want the whole deal, which I do recommend because it's very interesting, and I tried to shorten things to their bare minimums here. 
I'm specifically interested in the idea of two dominants who are involved with one another as a couple and share a sub/pet/slave/whatever, as opposed to other variations of the two-doms-one-sub theme. I know the knee-jerk reaction to this is "ZOMG, I could never serve more than one Dom/me, noooooooo!!!!!" But let's put those knee-jerk reactions aside for a moment, k? Thanks.
Ok, so the question is more than simply academic curiosity. (Imagine that, right?)
I've found myself in a very interesting situation. My Master and his wife (yes, she's kinky, and, no, it's not just to appease him) have been looking for a house pet for the two of them to share for some time. (All three of us are switches, just in varying degrees, if it makes any difference.) I asked him the other day if he'd have any objections to me approaching her and asking if I could basically apply for the position.
He was relieved, actually, LOL. It's what he's wanted all along, apparently, but he wanted me to be the one to mention it, so he wouldn't feel as if he influenced me in some way. So I approached his wife, and she responded pretty favorably to the idea. She and I will meet face-to-face for the first time on Friday.
Now, at the moment, the point is moot. I'm *his* slave, not *theirs*. But it is certainly something for me to think about and perhaps work toward if she and I hit it off and the interactions between the three of us go well.
If anyone's got any advice for me, I'll certainly take it, but that wasn't the sole purpose of the thread. I just wondered if anyone here has had any experience with or or knew anyone who has had with experience with this sort of two-doms-one-sub model.
This is, of course, a poly relationship. But I see it having far different implications than a PYL/pyl/pyl triad. I actually had a whole lot of pros and cons written out here, but then I deleted them because this post is long enough as it is.
Soooo...the PYL/PYL/pyl triad. What say y'all?
I'd be interested to see how the two dominants/one submissive model works. I know I've seen people say they couldn't imagine how it would work with two separate dominants, but I was more curious about, say, a dominant couple who brings in a submissive to serve the both of them.
Hmm. Fodder for another thread, perhaps?
My second response to you above indicates my preference for this thread to focus on the broader spectrum; however, I'd have no objection to - and would almost certainly contribute to - a thread exploring thoughts on the aspects of D/s poly-ism about which you're inquiring. I think that the two would have a number of areas of agreement, but an examination of the narrower area of D/s poly-ism would likely provide some notable differences.
I knew a dominant couple that had submissives about. The guy was an insufferable dickweed, so I can't say as how I was up on the internal workings of the relationship. I did get to know the Fdom half, and she basically said that they didn't play together, and had other folks to toy with as need be. I don't know that they ever kept communal property though.
If I see her again, I'll ask her more details. She's no longer with said insufferable dickweed, so she's a lot easier to deal with.
I know two tops who are married and have a kid. I think she's technically a switch, but she primarily tops. He IDs as a sadistic Dominant. For the most part, the submissives in their lives are for him, but she sometimes co-tops, and is involved with them in other more complicated ways. She's almost his relationship confidante, I think. As far as I know, their marriage is basically one of equals with some kinky sex thrown in. They satisfy their D/s needs outside of the marriage.
I know a dominant couple (married, totally in love/lust) that have a pet they both play with. Not sure the exact dynamic but it seems to work pretty well for them.
A dominant couple makes more sense. Two separate doms, one sub is a recipe for conflict. Two dominants in a close relationship with a mutual toy added in may well work much better. Could get interesting for the submissive.
it is possible, nay, highly recommended, for a couple of dom types to share a sub type. The "we share this toy" dynamic is great fun, and can be really healthy and beautiful - sub person gets lots and lots and lots of attention, doms bond over the shared project, and so on.
I'm specifically interested in the idea of two dominants who are involved with one another as a couple and share a sub/pet/slave/whatever, as opposed to other variations of the two-doms-one-sub theme. I know the knee-jerk reaction to this is "ZOMG, I could never serve more than one Dom/me, noooooooo!!!!!" But let's put those knee-jerk reactions aside for a moment, k? Thanks.
Ok, so the question is more than simply academic curiosity. (Imagine that, right?)
I've found myself in a very interesting situation. My Master and his wife (yes, she's kinky, and, no, it's not just to appease him) have been looking for a house pet for the two of them to share for some time. (All three of us are switches, just in varying degrees, if it makes any difference.) I asked him the other day if he'd have any objections to me approaching her and asking if I could basically apply for the position.
He was relieved, actually, LOL. It's what he's wanted all along, apparently, but he wanted me to be the one to mention it, so he wouldn't feel as if he influenced me in some way. So I approached his wife, and she responded pretty favorably to the idea. She and I will meet face-to-face for the first time on Friday.
Now, at the moment, the point is moot. I'm *his* slave, not *theirs*. But it is certainly something for me to think about and perhaps work toward if she and I hit it off and the interactions between the three of us go well.
If anyone's got any advice for me, I'll certainly take it, but that wasn't the sole purpose of the thread. I just wondered if anyone here has had any experience with or or knew anyone who has had with experience with this sort of two-doms-one-sub model.
This is, of course, a poly relationship. But I see it having far different implications than a PYL/pyl/pyl triad. I actually had a whole lot of pros and cons written out here, but then I deleted them because this post is long enough as it is.
Soooo...the PYL/PYL/pyl triad. What say y'all?