butters
High on a Hill
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2009
- Posts
- 84,466
When users asked the artificial intelligence tool whether a new candidate still had time to be added to ballots, Grok gave the incorrect answer.
Finding the source – and working to correct it – served as a test case of how election officials and artificial intelligence companies will interact during the 2024 presidential election in the US amid fears that AI could mislead or distract voters. And it showed the role Grok, specifically, could play in the election, as a chatbot with fewer guardrails to prevent the generating of more inflammatory content.
A group of secretaries of state and the organization that represents them, the National Association of Secretaries of State, contacted Grok and X to flag the misinformation. But the company didn’t work to correct it immediately, instead giving the equivalent of a shoulder shrug, said Steve Simon, the Minnesota secretary of state. “And that struck, I think it’s fair to say all of us, as really the wrong response,” he said.
no surprises, really, given musk's presence
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=b20bdebb2b03476f97095d5f6f51e3f3&ei=163
no doubt the next decade or so will see masses of new legislation/guard-rails introduced as the world learns to live with AI