RoryN
You're screwed.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2003
- Posts
- 60,646
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Breaking
D. I. S. T. R. A. C. T. I. O. N.
Yes, but also a move to attempt to justify his forthcoming dismantling of the FBI and other investigative institutions. (No matter that they happened decades ago.)
Should be interesting re: what's found vs. what isn't.
He signed the same EO in 2017.
Yes, but also a move to attempt to justify his forthcoming dismantling of the FBI and other investigative institutions. (No matter that they happened decades ago.)
Should be interesting re: what's found vs. what isn't.
Donald Trump’s former campaign lawyer is furious after his personal information and social security number were made public as part of this week’s release of unredacted JFK assassination files.
“It’s absolutely outrageous. It’s sloppy, unprofessional,” Joseph diGenova, a long-time Trump supporter who formerly served as the president’s lawyer on the campaign trail, told the Washington Post.
you voted for trump. Didn't think the leopard would eat your face, did ya?“It not only means identity theft, but I’ve had threats against me,” diGenova said. “In the past, I’ve had to report real threats against me to the FBI“There are dangerous nuts out there.”
the social security numbers of around 200 former congressional staffers and others, according to the Post, including 100 members of the Senate Church Committee established in 1975 to investigate abuses of authority by American intelligence services such as the CIA and FBI.
They people whose information was so willfully released on the order of "unredacted files, I order the release of them all, unredacted!" trump should sue BIGLY.... though that really only means the American taxpayer would be forking out and not trump, personallyMany of the individuals mentioned in the documents are still alive, including 80-year-old diGenova, who served on the committee in the 1970s.
“It makes sense that my name is in there,” he told the Post, “but the other sensitive stuff — it’s like a first-grade, elementary-level rule of security to redact things like that.”