Biden had nothing to do with the border bill getting tossed in the trash. That was all on Trump. Nice attempt at a field goal, to bad you missed.
Trump fucks up again. Ukraine negotiation goes sideways
- Thread starter eric_erosfan
- Start date
ChinoMoreno
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2017
- Posts
- 2,274
My mans is sundowning and agitated 
icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 20,099
Didn't say he did, his buddy Schumer let the house bill die. The senate bill was crap.
There is some scuttlebutt about the EU and UK now cutting a deal for the rare earth metals in Ukraine. This would help sell the massive support and money needed to make up for the loss of the US commitment. This is an interesting development, one that would piss Trump right off...so I support it!!!
Trump killed it, and you defend Trump's fuck ups by trying to blame Biden....*chuckles* then claim you don't carry water for Trump......TFF.
icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 20,099
Trump didn't fuck up, Biden lost control over the border and the senate bill was crap.
Trump didn't need a bill and the border's under control, so that makes Biden the fuck-up.
I can't believe he's offering the people of Gaza a beautiful future when he's on record as wanting them driven out, never to return!
The border did not need controlling.
ChinoMoreno
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2017
- Posts
- 2,274
I love the new wall! It kept out gazillions!
Bro if you think the border was only "lost" in the past 4 years you were not paying attention since the late 70s.
LOL, Sure he did....
"House Speaker Mike Johnson had a foot-in-mouth moment on Tuesday, absentmindedly admitting to reporters that he has courted Donald Trump’s opinion “at length” on the border deal he wants to kill.
“The former president has made it clear that he doesn’t want you guys to move forward on this, and judging by his comments, he clearly wants to campaign on this issue. Have you spoken to him about the Senate proposal, and are you simply trying to kill this to help him on the campaign?"
https://newrepublic.com/post/178564/mike-johnson-admit-killing-border-deal-help-trump
fucking no one claimed you were smart,just gullible.
jason28053
✌🏻
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2006
- Posts
- 17,169
But Musk in his T-shirt doesn’t mock the decorum. Got it. I guess Churchill was mocking us too.
icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 20,099
No doubt Trump didn't want the senate bill because the bill was crap. Shit happens when you're the leader of the party.
lol,
Thanks for the pretzel.....it needs more salt...
I will also add (as I have ad nauseam):
THE REPUBLICANS CONSTANTLY SAID (LIED) THE US HAD AN OPEN BORDER UNDER PRESIDENT BIDEN.
That ^ REPUBLICAN LIE was used by the human traffickers to entice desperate economic migrants to make the costly, difficult, and dangerous journey to the US, only to be deported by President Biden’s administration after crossing the border illegally because they didn’t meet asylum requirements.
The REPUBLICANS are SOLEY RESPONSIBLE for COUNTLESS rapes & deaths, suffering, and exacerbated poverty resulting from the migration fueled by their LIES: Not to mention" the crisis" at the border for the border patrol and border states, etc.
SHAME!!!
schism666
cold and ugly
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Posts
- 12,490
qué?
icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 20,099
WOW!!!!! Now that's what I call some serious delusional BULLSHIT. Pubs did all that behind the back of the official border tsar?I will also add (as I have ad nauseam):
THE REPUBLICANS CONSTANTLY SAID (LIED) THE US HAD AN OPEN BORDER UNDER PRESIDENT BIDEN.
That ^ REPUBLICAN LIE was used by the human traffickers to entice desperate economic migrants to make the costly, difficult, and dangerous journey to the US, only to be deported by President Biden’s administration after crossing the border illegally because they didn’t meet asylum requirements.
The REPUBLICANS are SOLEY RESPONSIBLE for COUNTLESS rapes & deaths, suffering, and exacerbated poverty resulting from the migration fueled by their LIES: Not to mention" the crisis" at the border for the border patrol and border states, etc.
SHAME!!!
The Tsar must have been a DEI hire! You missed even worse on this attempt. You might want to draft an new kicker for future goal posts.WOW!!!!! Now that's what I call some serious delusional BULLSHIT. Pubs did all that behind the back of the official border tsar?
schism666
cold and ugly
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Posts
- 12,490
now explain your comment that trump "secured the border."WOW!!!!! Now that's what I call some serious delusional BULLSHIT. Pubs did all that behind the back of the official border tsar?
I'm aware of it. I've got direct family in the US, my grandmother was American.That is the level of MAGAt brain rot we are dealing with here in the U.S..
ChloeTzang
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Posts
- 18,224
HumpDayHoratio
Slightly Aged
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2022
- Posts
- 7,836
Exactly. This is why the pigs are squealing loudly. Pudd’n Head was up to his ears in corruption.
Biden loves the smell of corruption…
ChloeTzang
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Posts
- 18,224
The fact that military assistance to Ukraine might have been cut before Zelensky’s meeting with Trump in the Oval Office—and only later reconnected—should serve as an example of the current mindset in Washington.
Trump is seeking alignment with Putin. Putin has asked for concessions, and concessions have been promised. We may not know the full extent of those promises, but we must be prepared for all of it. Ukraine’s sovereignty, military support, security guarantees and political future could have already been handed over in exchange for the alignment with Russia that Trump is pursuing. But since openly selling out like that to Putin looks politically unpalatable, the administration will use any means necessary to cover its tracks.
As someone who grew up in 1990s Lithuania, I remember all too well how older kids from the nearby Russian school would wait for us on our way to class. If they had decided to beat you up, they would find a reason. Whatever you did, they would make it happen. It reminds me of an old Russian prison joke. A man asks another for a cigarette. The other says he doesn’t have one. “Do you have a light?”—“No, I don’t smoke.” The first man sighs, then punches him. “Why?” the beaten man asks. “Because you’re not wearing a hat.” That’s how it worked in the streets too. If you had a cigarette, they took it. If you had money, they took it. If you gave them nothing, they hit you just because. There was no right answer, because it was never about cigarettes, or money, or hats. It was about power.
And if you wanted to survive, you had to act accordingly. If you could fight, you fought. If you couldn’t fight, you avoided their territory. If you couldn’t avoid it, you made sure you weren’t alone. What you didn’t do was think that carrying a hat, cigarettes, or money would save you. That was the mistake of those who didn’t understand the rules—they gave up everything and still got beaten. Because the Russian thug stops only when challenged.
And the same logic plays out not just on the streets, but in geopolitics.
–“Sign this deal on your minerals.”
–“Ok.”
–“Well… then we’ll punch you because you didn’t wear a suit.”
It’s not about the minerals, or the elections, or any of it.
It’s about submission.
That was true in 1939, when the Soviet Union signed a Mutual Assistance Pact with Lithuania and stationed 20,000 troops in our country. A year later, the Soviets said there was an "incident" involving some Soviet soldiers. This was used as the pretext for an ultimatum. The Soviets demanded the resignation of Lithuania’s government within 48 hours or surrender to occupation. But at the time the Foreign Minister received this ultimatum, a Soviet invasion force was already marching towards our border. The occupation was a fait accompli.
We didn’t know then that it had all been agreed in advance in the secret Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
Today, we have no excuse for such naivety. It’s a safe bet that the Trump-Putin Pact already exists—and we should act accordingly.
It was never about what Zelenskyy did, said or wore. It was always a fabricated pretext to justify an already under way alignment with russia.
Trump is seeking alignment with Putin. Putin has asked for concessions, and concessions have been promised. We may not know the full extent of those promises, but we must be prepared for all of it. Ukraine’s sovereignty, military support, security guarantees and political future could have already been handed over in exchange for the alignment with Russia that Trump is pursuing. But since openly selling out like that to Putin looks politically unpalatable, the administration will use any means necessary to cover its tracks.
As someone who grew up in 1990s Lithuania, I remember all too well how older kids from the nearby Russian school would wait for us on our way to class. If they had decided to beat you up, they would find a reason. Whatever you did, they would make it happen. It reminds me of an old Russian prison joke. A man asks another for a cigarette. The other says he doesn’t have one. “Do you have a light?”—“No, I don’t smoke.” The first man sighs, then punches him. “Why?” the beaten man asks. “Because you’re not wearing a hat.” That’s how it worked in the streets too. If you had a cigarette, they took it. If you had money, they took it. If you gave them nothing, they hit you just because. There was no right answer, because it was never about cigarettes, or money, or hats. It was about power.
And if you wanted to survive, you had to act accordingly. If you could fight, you fought. If you couldn’t fight, you avoided their territory. If you couldn’t avoid it, you made sure you weren’t alone. What you didn’t do was think that carrying a hat, cigarettes, or money would save you. That was the mistake of those who didn’t understand the rules—they gave up everything and still got beaten. Because the Russian thug stops only when challenged.
And the same logic plays out not just on the streets, but in geopolitics.
–“Sign this deal on your minerals.”
–“Ok.”
–“Well… then we’ll punch you because you didn’t wear a suit.”
It’s not about the minerals, or the elections, or any of it.
It’s about submission.
That was true in 1939, when the Soviet Union signed a Mutual Assistance Pact with Lithuania and stationed 20,000 troops in our country. A year later, the Soviets said there was an "incident" involving some Soviet soldiers. This was used as the pretext for an ultimatum. The Soviets demanded the resignation of Lithuania’s government within 48 hours or surrender to occupation. But at the time the Foreign Minister received this ultimatum, a Soviet invasion force was already marching towards our border. The occupation was a fait accompli.
We didn’t know then that it had all been agreed in advance in the secret Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
Today, we have no excuse for such naivety. It’s a safe bet that the Trump-Putin Pact already exists—and we should act accordingly.
It was never about what Zelenskyy did, said or wore. It was always a fabricated pretext to justify an already under way alignment with russia.
ChloeTzang
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Posts
- 18,224
MajorRewrite
Iffy
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
- Posts
- 8,080
Similar threads
