ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 64,650
There is.There is no evidence
There is no evidence supporting your statements. (Or those of white_bB)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is.There is no evidence
Show me evidence there is, andThere is.
There is no evidence supporting your statements. (Or those of white_bB)
Already posted earlier in this thread. Statements from family and friends about her being bullied.Show me evidence there is, and
LolWhat is white bB
Family n friends are not credible sources, especially since the family lied with full view of allAlready posted earlier in this thread. Statements from family and friends about her being bullied.
Lol
That's an incorrect statement and you'd fail as a detective.Family n friends are not credible sources, especially since the family lied with full view of all
She dies of a drug overdose.That's an incorrect statement and you'd fail as a detective.
If there were statements by others that opposed their statements on bullying, the their credibility may come into question, but there aren't. There are corroborative statements of bullying of Nex. There are corroborative statements of Nex's head being slammed to the ground.
You saying "nu uh" isn't a credible statement and your buddy agreeing with you actually makes it less credible.
There is no evidence of anythingThat's an incorrect statement and you'd fail as a detective.
If there were statements by others that opposed their statements on bullying, the their credibility may come into question, but there aren't. There are corroborative statements of bullying of Nex. There are corroborative statements of Nex's head being slammed to the ground.
You saying "nu uh" isn't a credible statement and your buddy agreeing with you actually makes it less credible.
No one here would give two shits if you chose to off yourself. Some might even celebrate.Nex claims bullying, also says it was she would poured water on them, so she was the aggressive one
No credible evidence she was bullied, and even if true, don't kill yourself
So the Trump kids lied?Family n friends are not credible sources, especially since the family lied with full view of all
So you believe squirting water at people is bullying.Nex claims bullying, also says it was she would poured water on them, so she was the aggressive one
No credible evidence she was bullied, and even if true, don't kill yourself
Ya learn something new every day: Today I learned that Benadryl is the ONLY over-the-counter decongestant you can technically "overdose" on. It's a first-generation cold remedy and pharmacists have been pleading for years to have it taken off the shelf."Suicide by Mixing Incompatible Medications"
Found in her stomach: One Prozac tablet. One Benadryl tablet.
So you think simple assertions and statements from multiple people is any kind of credible evidence?If there were statements by others that opposed their statements on bullying, the their credibility may come into question, but there aren't. There are corroborative statements of bullying of Nex. There are corroborative statements of Nex's head being slammed to the ground.
If we don't need witness testimony, why do we have courts?So you think simple assertions and statements from multiple people is any kind of credible evidence?
I take it you're religious, and you find millions of people claiming personal experience and making statements about the existence of some god is quite convincing evidence then, right?
I suggest you educate yourself on how extremely unreliable witness testimony and claims are.If we don't need witness testimony, why do we have courts?
And yet....and yet... the courts allow witnesses to testify!I suggest you educate yourself on how extremely unreliable witness testimony and claims are.
You can start here:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-the-eyes-have-it/
Who said they don't?And yet....and yet... the courts allow witnesses to testify!
Because a lot of people falsely think witness testimony is reliable, which is clearly false.Why is that?
Since the 1990s, when DNA testing was first introduced, Innocence Project researchers have reported that 73 percent of the 239 convictions overturned through DNA testing were based on eyewitness testimony.
no physical evidence of that, the video after the so called alleged event showed no trauma at all. walking out with no obvious injury and the cam interview in the hospital showed no damage, you are brain dead and bran washedDoesn't change the fact that Nex was stomped to death by transphobic students, but I thought I'd share that nonetheless.
Let's wait for the full autopsy report, then we can make fun of your assumptions.no physical evidence of that, the video after the so called alleged event showed no trauma at all. walking out with no obvious injury and the cam interview in the hospital showed no damage, you are brain dead and bran washed
The autopsy is out. I have no doubt it will be altered by Stasi to fit the must adhered to narrative. The videos are clear, your mind isntLet's wait for the full autopsy report, then we can make fun of your assumptions.
How many of those religious folk take a witness stand and get cross examined?Who said they don't?
Because a lot of people falsely think witness testimony is reliable, which is clearly false.
For example, from my earlier source:
And if you're still not convinced, refer to the fact we have billions of people on the planet who claim to believe in god, and happily testify to their own experiences and statements on the issue.
Take a wild guess how seriously I entertain the testimony of billions of people claiming god exists.
Absolutely. That's why police take statements like the one taken from Nex.So you think simple assertions and statements from multiple people is any kind of credible evidence?
This is a dumb take.I take it you're religious, and you find millions of people claiming personal experience and making statements about the existence of some god is quite convincing evidence then, right?