Toronto mass killer part of terrorist organization...of losers who can't get laid

[BotanyBoy]

No, I've been doing that for days now. You just realized it.

No you've been making implications by claiming I've been defending them.

Even though I've done no such thing.

That was the first time you've had the grit to come out and say it directly....then followed it up with name calling.

Sounds like you're mad....I'm guessing because you can't back up that lie.


You going to define anarchism or keep making up lies about me??

 

[psiberzerker]

No I don't see the inherent contradiction in coming to an agreed upon meaning for a word, it's the fundamental basis for all communication.

A single agreed apon definition of a word, instead of multiple usage of it in context? We also have sentences, so We the people can tell the difference between We, plural, and you talking to yourself.

We didn't agree on that definition. You picked the one to describe anarchists, without actually asking anarchists. That's not democratic agreement, that's totalitarian decree.

The fundimental basis of communication is we both talk, and we both listen. In any language, even without words. (All communication, ALL of it, doesn't all have words. I can still give you the finger. nlm. Those laughing boy memes didn't have any words.) Dogs can fucking do that. You can write, but you can't read. That's not literacy.

The anarchists define anarchism. That's the whole point. The statist discredit us, that's your whole ploy.

You can't force me to agree on what you decided. That's statist. Not freedom. You think you know what that word means, but it means I have some say in the matter, no matter how loudly you scream.

Now, about those other incels. The only difference I can see (Since you skipped past it, again) is you're not willing to admit you can't get laid.

 

[BotanyBoy]

A single agreed apon definition of a word, instead of multiple usage of it in context?

The context is political philosophy/ideology.

We didn't agree on that definition.

Yea I got that, so do you or do you not have a definition for the word?

Or are you just using it as a pretend term so you don't have to cop to your violent socialist, statist, authoritarian bullshit??

Now, about those other incels. The only difference I can see (Since you skipped past it, again) is you're not willing to admit you can't get laid.

I skipped it because it's a lie working on top of a false assumption that doesn't even apply to me because I'm not an incel (your lies notwithstanding) and I don't care about sex.

I tried it, didn't get the hype and after some soul searching decided to chase paper instead of pussy, best choice I ever made

 

[psiberzerker]

The context is political philosophy/ideology.

Yes, when we're talking about political philosophy/ideology. You can't do that, so the context is what single word you can focus on that invalidates me, so you can call me names again. Ad hominem semantics is not philosophical, it's not political. It doesn't make you sound more intellectual, it's just infantile.

Yea I got that,

No, you didn't. I spent an entire page trying to explain it to you, and you turned it into another vocabulary lesson. So, I'm not going through all that again. Go there, find it, do the reading, and understand it this time.

I skipped it because... I don't care about sex.

So, you're voluntarily celibate?

I tried it, didn't get the hype and after some soul searching decided to chase paper instead of pussy, best choice I ever made

Yeah, actually I respect the hell out of that. It only took you 3 fucking pages to GET that question. I shouldn't have to accuse you of being an incel to get that out of you.

 

[psiberzerker]

Look, this feeling of superiority is what underpins all of these terrorists. All of them, they're hate crimes on a grander scale. Calling themselves incels is an insult to truly celibate and assexual people (Like B-Boy, and myself.)

So, in this case, this word Incel is all Emotional meaning. The definition of a word would be paramount, stripped of all emotional context, if it doesn't have any emotional context.

For example, "Lady." To a Contessa, it is her title. Like Lord.

To a stranger, "Watch it, Lady!" is an insult. Just like "Mertyl, git th' hose, the dadblamed liberlz is at it agin!"

When an MRA says "Milady," holding the door, it's a lie. The trick with a lie is, you know it's not the truth, but it could mean ANYTHING else. It's possessive, "My Lady," but like "My nigga," there's a difference when a white guy says it, and a black guy says it. Kanye West is Donny's White-Housenigga. (I believe that his official term in the Cabinet is Secretary for Urban Outreach, and Hip-Hip. Also, he carries his golden toilet brush.)

So, back to celibacy. That used to mean a Choice, not to have sex. A vow of celibacy, or just someone who has something more important to worry about in her life.

Notice that. Women have a choice to say "No," to sex. Now, Incels are resenting not that they can't have sex. They can Hypathetically) or if they can't, they may feel some inadequacy from that, but they shift the blame to the women. This is something that was Done To Them, by women. Feminists ruined the dating scene, so nice guys can't get teh sexor.

My point is, forcing this on someone is taking your rights, from them. If she exercises her right to say "No, thank you," then they change the wording around to Play the Victim. (Not the voluntary celibates, that's a choice. The incels, that claim it's not their choice, but oppression.)

Now, if nobody else wants to Argue about this, hopefully We can Chose to discuss it. Rationally, without getting all emotional, and semantic about it.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Yes, when we're talking about political philosophy/ideology. You can't do that, so the context is what single word you can focus on that invalidates me, so you can call me names again. Ad hominem semantics is not philosophical, it's not political. It doesn't make you sound more intellectual, it's just infantile.

No, you didn't. I spent an entire page trying to explain it to you, and you turned it into another vocabulary lesson. So, I'm not going through all that again. Go there, find it, do the reading, and understand it this time.

1) you were the only one name calling.

2) So you're just using "anarchist" to mean whatever you want, but mostly "progressive" socialist because you don't want to own up to that even though that's what you seem to support.

So, you're voluntarily celibate?

Asexual.....I'm not against sex, I'm just not that interested.

Yeah, actually I respect the hell out of that. It only took you 3 fucking pages to GET that question. I shouldn't have to accuse you of being an incel to get that out of you.

You should have just asked directly instead of making up wild lies and accusations.

 

[psiberzerker]

1) you were the only one name calling.

Bullshit. I didn't even use the word statist until you found out I'm an anarchist, and hit the kneejerk button. You can't believe that you never resorted to namecalling. You're not that delusional.

So you're just using "anarchist" to mean whatever you want, but mostly...

Here's the strawman of my position:

"progressive" socialist because you don't want to own up to that even though that's what you seem to support.

You see it now? There it is, whatever I say, here it comes. I don't know what she's talking about, so therefore, ipso-facto, quid quo pro, ad nauseum, she doesn't know what she's talking about. Time to bring out the "Quotes."

Again, the basis of communication is WE talk. WE listen. That's a discussion, join it. I'm sick of corecting your strawman. Again, no I'm not a socialist.

Again.

I

Am

Not

Your

Straman.

Burn it. I had to change my Signature for you, and you still didn't fucking read it, did you? Start over, jerk off with the ashes, IDFK, but you will never randomly guess, and you will never know my political beliefs if

You

Don't

LISTEN.

Dumbfuck. Nobody else can tell you my political beliefs, and I can't tell you, shouting over you telling me MY political beliefs.

Stop it. Now.

Asexual.....I'm not against sex, I'm just not that interested.

I'm asexual too. Now, would you like to discuss this?

You should have just asked directly instead of making up wild lies and accusations.

I did, multiple times. You missed it, because you were too busy telling me what I believe. You missed the question, because of your lies, and accusations. You couldn't even READ it unless I reworded it as an accusation.

Get help.

 

[Taint_mAnn]

*chvckles*

 

[cowslinger64]

Bullshit. I didn't even use the word statist until you found out I'm an anarchist, and hit the kneejerk button. You can't believe that you never resorted to namecalling. You're not that delusional.



Here's the strawman of my position:



You see it now? There it is, whatever I say, here it comes. I don't know what she's talking about, so therefore, ipso-facto, quid quo pro, ad nauseum, she doesn't know what she's talking about. Time to bring out the "Quotes."

Again, the basis of communication is WE talk. WE listen. That's a discussion, join it. I'm sick of corecting your strawman. Again, no I'm not a socialist.

Again.

I

Am

Not

Your

Straman.

Burn it. I had to change my Signature for you, and you still didn't fucking read it, did you? Start over, jerk off with the ashes, IDFK, but you will never randomly guess, and you will never know my political beliefs if

You

Don't

LISTEN.

Dumbfuck. Nobody else can tell you my political beliefs, and I can't tell you, shouting over you telling me MY political beliefs.

Stop it. Now.



I'm asexual too. Now, would you like to discuss this?



I did, multiple times. You missed it, because you were too busy telling me what I believe. You missed the question, because of your lies, and accusations. You couldn't even READ it unless I reworded it as an accusation.

Get help.

Lol.. As long as you continue to reply to Captain Braindead, you'll see the same broken record stupidity..

In all the years I've been on message boards, I've never seen anyone so annoyingly persistent in proving what a pathetic idiot they are.

If you literally have nothing better to do.. Then by all means continue engaging.

 

[psiberzerker]

As long as you continue to reply to Captain Braindead, you'll see the same broken record stupidity.

I have interacted with him long enough to pick up on the pattern. He does "Actually" argue rationally to start, and as his assumptions (Sorry, "Truth") are examined, becomes Progressively emotional, and retarded. I started doing it to him intentionally, about 3 pages back.

He can't control his emotions, well enough to argue rationally. Therefore, the more rational the argument, the more "Right" it is. Inversely, the more Emotional the argument (In plaintext, I don't even use Smileys to differentiate the parody from a sincere crank) the more likely He is to lose.

However, He's led himself to believe that All arguments follow this pattern, because all the arguments he's been in regress to namecalling when he gets upset. So, he skips back to the beginning of the track...

"Circular logic, or recursive reason, is only internally consistent, Where it refers to itself. This is what I call a Strange Loop." ~Douglas R. Hoffstadter. (In an interview promoting his second book, Strange Loops, sequel to Gödel Escher Back: An endless golden braid.)

In all the years I've been on message boards, I've never seen anyone so annoyingly persistent in proving what a pathetic idiot they are.

Yeah, well I used to moderate a Usenet board for fans of Serial Killers. (Under the handle Agent_of_Evolution before I started playing Armored Core. ΨΒΣΡZΣΡK was my Raven name, until Master of Arena came out. Yes, I knew those were Sigmas, just like I knew those were Rhos.)

You think gamers, and reactionary antisocialists are trolls? You have no idea. He's not just a troll in denial, he's a BASIC troll. {Goto Start
endlf}
Among other things, Tanking them keeps them from humping other people's legs, (Actually, I've been kiting him around with a reverse joint, and a sniper rifle/rifle combo so he'll follow me around the track Wreck it Ralph made in his head.) until they find something better to do.

Why I keep trip-trapping on their bridge. I have plenty of time...

 

[BotanyBoy]

Bullshit. I didn't even use the word statist until you found out I'm an anarchist, and hit the kneejerk button. You can't believe that you never resorted to namecalling. You're not that delusional.

Well you advocated state authority.

You know the quote is there....why is it so hard for you to own it?

You called me dumbass because you got all mad when I caught you advocating state authority, then asked you to define anarchism for me.

Again, no I'm not a socialist.

Again.

I

Am

Not

Your

Straman.

If that's true then why do you advocate state authority over economic outcomes, education and "fore the greater good" ?

I have interacted with him long enough to pick up on the pattern. He does "Actually" argue rationally to start, and as his assumptions (Sorry, "Truth") are examined, becomes Progressively emotional, and retarded. I started doing it to him intentionally, about 3 pages back.

He can't control his emotions, well enough to argue rationally. /QUOTE]

I'm not the one who's getting emotional

 

[BotanyBoy]

Lol.. As long as you continue to reply to Captain Braindead, you'll see the same broken record stupidity..

In all the years I've been on message boards, I've never seen anyone so annoyingly persistent in proving what a pathetic idiot they are.

LOL coming from the guy who's got a total of 4 canned responses.

Tell us more about what a great deal Romney Care is!! It's only 5 times more expensive than UHC and disproportionately paid for on the backs of the poor/working class!! Extra regressive Republicanism turned into a holy miracle by (D)ear Leader Obama right???

 

[psiberzerker]

Why don't you tell about what a great deal Romney Care is!

Why don't you talk about how you feel about being misrepresented by incels, as a celibate asexual?

As a matter of fact, why can't you stay on topic whenever there's someone else to speak for?

Speak for yourself, or start learning how to. It's probably the only subject you're Actually an expert on here.

 

[psiberzerker]

I caught you advocating state authority, then asked you to define anarchism for me.

I don't define it for you. You don't define it for me.

 

[HisArpy]

I don't define it for you. You don't define it for me.

Uh huh. Good evasion Obvious but evasive none the less.

 

[cowslinger64]

LOL coming from the guy who's got a total of 4 canned responses.

Tell us more about what a great deal Romney Care is!! It's only 5 times more expensive than UHC and disproportionately paid for on the backs of the poor/working class!! Extra regressive Republicanism turned into a holy miracle by (D)ear Leader Obama right???

To the people in this country that have access to health care, it's awesome. The people that don't have to suffer and die needlessly, it's awesome. There is NO UHC, which even a dumbass like you is aware of.

Yep, we should have single payer in this country.. thank the assholes on the right for that. Keep on enjoying your gubmint paid healthcare while whining like a fuckin cunt constantly about others having access.. Hell, I pay taxes and if it goes to save lives, I'm good with that.

You can keep the broken record bullshit going as long as you like.. it's all you got.

 

[HisArpy]

To the people in this country that have access to health care, it's awesome. The people that don't have to suffer and die needlessly, it's awesome. There is NO UHC, which even a dumbass like you is aware of.

Yep, we should have single payer in this country.. thank the assholes on the right for that. Keep on enjoying your gubmint paid healthcare while whining like a fuckin cunt constantly about others having access.. Hell, I pay taxes and if it goes to save lives, I'm good with that.

You can keep the broken record bullshit going as long as you like.. it's all you got.

More narcissism.

YOU'RE ok with paying taxes to support someone else. Ok fine. WHY are you requiring me to do that same? Don't I have a say in how/where MY MONEY gets spent?

 

[psiberzerker]

Uh huh. Good evasion Obvious but evasive none the less.

It's part of the definition. The part you're going to accept, first. Anarchy means, among other things, freedom from Dictators who tell you how to live.

Without laws, we can abandon statist shit like the "No True Scottsman" phallusy. Stop calling each other "Statists," or telling each other what a "Real Anarchist" Believes.

We can just live our own lives. And worry about defending our private property from our Neighbors. Unfortunately, that also means giving up the protection of Socialist programs, like police, fire, and rescue. The Government pays for that, however at the same time, we don't have to worry about the Police breaking in, and arresting us for "Crimes against nature."

However, we can't have any of that, as long as we let statists tell us what we think, and believe. Get over that, and then we can talk...

 

[HisArpy]

It's part of the definition. The part you're going to accept, first. Anarchy means, among other things, freedom from Dictators who tell you how to live.

Without laws, we can abandon statist shit like the "No True Scottsman" phallusy. Stop calling each other "Statists," or telling each other what a "Real Anarchist" Believes.

We can just live our own lives. And worry about defending our private property from our Neighbors. Unfortunately, that also means giving up the protection of Socialist programs, like police, fire, and rescue. The Government pays for that, however at the same time, we don't have to worry about the Police breaking in, and arresting us for "Crimes against nature."

However, we can't have any of that, as long as we let statists tell us what we think, and believe. Get over that, and then we can talk...

So when it's all boiled down, what you're saying is that anarchists have rules against obeying rules...

 

[psiberzerker]

"what you're saying is"

No, I barely even started. I'm a progressive anarchist. So, this is going to take time. You want to start a thread on Statism, because this still has fuck-all to do with incels, and terror attacks.

 

[cowslinger64]

More narcissism.

YOU'RE ok with paying taxes to support someone else. Ok fine. WHY are you requiring me to do that same? Don't I have a say in how/where MY MONEY gets spent?

Narcissism? That doesn't make any fuckin sense. I believe in the greater good of the people in this country. IMO, healthcare is as important as the infrastructure that we pay taxes to fund

. ACA doesn't actually benefit me, I have healthcare and have since I was in the military.

The previous plan of "fuck you I got mine" is the height of selfish.. not caring if people suffer because of a lack of access is shitty. You're an American, suck it up and do the right thing and don't be a whiny cunt like botanydummy. So, do you have a say in how all your money gets spent? No. And you never have.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Why don't you talk about how you feel about being misrepresented by incels, as a celibate asexual?

I'm not being misrepresented.

Only bigots who think 1 asshole = entire demographic block would think such a thing.

Speak for yourself, or start learning how to. It's probably the only subject you're Actually an expert on here.

Plant science, small arms, explosives, guerrilla warfare and MOUT tactics.

But sure, keep making idiotic assumptions.

I don't define it for you. You don't define it for me.

So the word has NO MEANING WHATSOEVER.

Leaving me to the default consensus definition (what all the reference books written by the academics say it is)...where you are anything but an anarchist.

There is NO UHC, which even a dumbass like you is aware of.

No shit.....THANKS DEMOCRATS AND OBAMA!

Yep, we should have single payer in this country.

We should...especially for the ASTRO-FUCKING-NOMICAL price we pay thanks to your BELOVED Romneycare.

Hell, I pay taxes and if it goes to save lives, I'm good with that.

You can keep the broken record bullshit going as long as you like.. it's all you got.

At what point do you start to get pissed about how much money isn't going to save lives??

6....8...12 times the price of UHC?

How long are you gonna suck on Obama's wrinkle grommet and let (D)'s rat fuck the lower/working class?

Is there any amount they could be fucking you for that you wouldn't just LOVE???


Probably not....as long as it's a (D)emocrap there is no limit to what you wouldn't support and suck them off for.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Narcissism? That doesn't make any fuckin sense. I believe in the greater good of the people in this country. IMO, healthcare is as important as the infrastructure that we pay taxes to fund

And you think your opinion is so righteous you're justified in using force of violence to force it upon others....Narcissist.

The previous plan of "fuck you I got mine" is the height of selfish.. not caring if people suffer because of a lack of access is shitty.

But it is fair, it is freedom and it is the American way.

You want to be a totalitarian socialist don't be shocked when you get resistance...this is the USA not Soviet America you stupid twat.

You're an American, suck it up and do the right thing and don't be a whiny cunt like botanydummy.

Talks about being American, immediately promotes socialism and calls the capitalist a cunt.

So, do you have a say in how all your money gets spent? No. And you never have.

That doesn't make your advocating economic oppression somehow less un-American.

 

[ryan8558]

More narcissism.

YOU'RE ok with paying taxes to support someone else. Ok fine. WHY are you requiring me to do that same? Don't I have a say in how/where MY MONEY gets spent?

For that you have one vote for a representative, two senators and a president.

 

[psiberzerker]

Plant science, small arms, explosives, guerrilla warfare and MOUT tactics.

Which is more useful for an eco-terrorist than discussing Incels. I said Here. In this thread, if you could stay on Topic.

So the word has NO MEANING WHATSOEVER.

Quite the opposite. Ideally, it's meaning is like Happiness. It means different things to different people. If you want a family, there's no law against it. If you want to be husbands without kids, there's no law against that. It's basically freedom From governments, and Laws. It doesn't mean No Rules after the first stage of it. Progressive Anarchism is thinking Past the first stage... But first, you have to Accept that.

At what point do you start to get pissed about how much money isn't going to save lives?

I don't care about money, it's only worth what I can get from it. I don't care about sex, either, because i'm asexual. Your governemtn ensures that i need money to survive, and brands me a criminal for how i get it, but I only pay sales tax. So, they don't get much of mine in return.

The fact that you put a price on lives is a statement that our government values money over lives.

How long are you gonna suck on Obama's wrinkle grommet?

Depends on how much he pays me for my time.

Is there any amount they could be fucking you for that you wouldn't just LOVE?

I don't love it, it's a means to an end. It's a job, it's just work for me. For them? It's whatever they pay me for.

I don't have to kill anyone for it.