Toronto mass killer part of terrorist organization...of losers who can't get laid

[psiberzerker]

Gotta love how this is the one time people who make these arguments don’t apply a socioeconomic bell curve distribution to outcomes.

LOL, that might be a little too advanced for them. Baby steps...

I'm hoping they're busy reading their own scriptures right now.

 

[Antryg_Windrose]

Cut to the chase: loners with boners kill.

 

[psiberzerker]

Cut to the chase: loners with boners kill.

That is truly beautiful. Seriously. I love that.

 

[Oblimo]

Are you a chick? Then who did you hear this from? Was it a "Chick," or was it a dude that didn't want you to talk to his girlfriend?

I was on 4chan’s /d/ board debating who drew more man-positive futanari, kami tora or dimytris, when a MGTOW activist had a crisis of faith and went on a Jeremiad about the virtues of emotional dildonics.

 

[Oblimo]

I'm hoping they're busy reading their own scriptures right now.

I can’t see BotanyBoy being incel-sympathetic (in this conversation, at least) while making Ben Carson’s arguments about poverty and addiction. I can’t fathom him saying, for example, “abject poverty and drug addiction is a choice (albeit a tough one)” and “incels are alone and women are to blame.”

 

[psiberzerker]

I was on 4chan’s /d/ board debating who drew more man-positive futanari, kami tora or dimytris, when a MGTOW activist had a crisis of faith and went on a Jeremiad about the virtues of emotional dildonics.

LOL! Big fan of Dmitrys, especially "Peach."

Which is more "Man Positive" is up for debate, but when I left 4chan, Rule #34b was "And psiberzerker has seen it all." This was back when it was actually plausible to see all the pron on teh intawebz, but for reference, Rule #34a was: "And it's probably made in Japan."

Then, Anonymous hacked the boards, and hijacked the Rules of the Internet threads. I doubt much has changed.

(Also, back then Rule #16 was "There are no girls on the internet.")

 

[ThatsTheGuy]

So now we're supposed to treat crack whores and prostitutes with respect? Lol

Someone steal your credit card again?

 

[psiberzerker]

Crack whores, And prostitutes. Because strawberry isn't a real job. This is the problem with relationship advice from guys who can't tell the difference between junkies, and crackheads. (A junkie will steal from you. A crackhead will rob you, then help you look for it.)

 

[ThatsTheGuy]

Crack whores, And prostitutes. Because strawberry isn't a real job. This is the problem with relationship advice from guys who can't tell the difference between junkies, and crackheads. (A junkie will steal from you. A crackhead will rob you, then help you look for it.)

LOL! I thought I was the only one who experienced this.

 

[psiberzerker]

LOL! I thought I was the only one who experienced this.

Nope, Tweakers too. All that extra energy, but oddly enough Cokeheads don't.

 

[BotanyBoy]

That's what this site is for. People to read. If you can't do that, then shut the fuck up.

It's also a forum people to post their thoughts, ideas and opinions.

Sooooo...
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/wrng.gif

Gotta love how this is the one time people who make these arguments don’t apply a socioeconomic bell curve distribution to outcomes.

Oh is it the bell curve that confines psi to prostitution as the ONLY POSSIBLE means of generating an income?

I'm hoping they're busy reading their own scriptures right now.

I'm not into mythology/fantasy so much....so no.

I was actually out buying a new hoe.....
http://www.formalourd.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/pelle-hydraulique1.jpg

Should be at the yard wednesday afternoon

I can’t see BotanyBoy being incel-sympathetic (in this conversation, at least) while making Ben Carson’s arguments about poverty and addiction. I can’t fathom him saying, for example, “abject poverty and drug addiction is a choice (albeit a tough one)” and “incels are alone and women are to blame.”

No.

They are a choice...and incels are to blame for the incels shitty existence.

 

[psiberzerker]

incels are to blame for the incels shitty existence.

Well, nice point on the end. Better late than never? Also, great Excavator. That's damned near pornographic for me.

Yes, there's also a forum for people to talk about whatever. However, you have to understand that any illiterates at a literature forum are at a disadvantage.

Since you're not illiterate, I'm amazed that you missed that point, as you're obviously not in any hurry to get to yours.

 

[Oblimo]

Then, Anonymous hacked the boards, and hijacked the Rules of the Internet threads. I doubt much has changed.

It’s still filled with the “conservative” reactionary non-ironic counterculture exploitation that everyone on /pol/ fell for 6 years ago or so. It will take a while for irony to return.

 

[psiberzerker]

It’s still filled with the “conservative” reactionary non-ironic counterculture exploitation that everyone on /pol/ fell for 6 years ago or so. It will take a while for irony to return...

Funny how conservative have that affect. It's no fun not having any fun if someone else is having fun.

Okay, well at least they still have decent ecchi, so there's that?

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/StopHavingFunGuys

 

[BotanyBoy]

Conservative or liberal?

Not everything that doesn't toe the "progressive" line = conservative Nazis.

 

[psiberzerker]

Not everything that doesn't toe the "progressive" line = conservative Nazis.

HAHA! Really? Okay, telling girls to "Shut your whore mouth" on 4chan is liberal then? Left of center/ libertarian/ you tell me, I'm sure you have your Dictionary handy.

"I'm not defending incells. How dare you call them Conservative?"

If you start with well, you know, actually, we're much more likely to believe you.

 

[BotanyBoy]

HAHA! Really?

Really.

There is more than "progressive" and everything else "progressives" don't like = conservative.

No matter how tightly your wrap yourself up in warm ignorance and try to ignore it.

Okay, telling girls to "Shut your whore mouth" on 4chan is liberal then? Left of center/ libertarian/ you tell me, I'm sure you have your Dictionary handy.

Rude, and not a distinct political position.

The dictionary is online and just as handy for you as it is for me, you should try using it more often.

"I'm not defending incells. How dare you call them Conservative?"

If you start with well, you know, actually, we're much more likely to believe you.

I'm not defending incells, I'm stating facts.

But don't let that get in the way of your emotionally driven ascription and lies via misquoting me.

 

[psiberzerker]

Also, rape threats, appealing to authority, and terror attacks are attempts at emotional arguments (When you don't have a logical argument.) This is an emotional argument. How women feel about being threatened by conservative men to put them back in their place is the topic. Not a non-sequitor.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Also, rape threats, appealing to authority, and terror attacks are attempts at emotional arguments (When you don't have a logical argument.)

Threats and attacks aren't arguments.

You need to look up what those words mean.

This is an emotional argument.

No, it's not.

Arguments are inherently not emotional...thats why you loose your argument when you get emotional.

How women feel about being threatened by conservative men to put them back in their place is the topic.

That argument is flawed, the men being discussed (incells) are not conservative.

Misogyny =/= conservatism any more than misandry =/= progressivism.

 

[psiberzerker]

Arguments are inherently not emotional...thats why you loose your argument when you get emotional.

No. Arguments are intrinsically emotional, because the human beings that argue them are. A Valid argument may be rational, but look that up in the dictionary if you haven't already. I know you got one. It doesn't say anything about only pure-blood Vulcans arguing, Dr. Spoc.

Now, why are you pathologically incapable of even mentioning the topic you're derailing? Any topic you're derailing?

Our emotions don't make us wrong, they make us human.

 

[psiberzerker]

Misogyny =/= conservatism any more than misandry =/= progressivism.

I'm not making that equivalency. Conservatism=/=Climate Change Denial either, but it's a conservative view. Misandry isn't a progressive view, it's an accusation to invalidate progressives for wanting to vote for women. (Even ifshe's not really suited to the job she's nominated for. I have to admit, she was a good SoS, but then, Bernie would make a better SoI, and Donny can't manage a Casino.)

 

[RocketLauncher]

Misogyny =/= conservatism any more than misandry =/= progressivism.

They both equal hate, and we all know that hate is a cancer that eats at the soul.

 

[BotanyBoy]

No. Arguments are intrinsically emotional, because the human beings that argue them are.

They are not intrinsically emotional....people are, but arguments are not.

In fact the more emotional the person making the argument, the poorer the argument is.

Supporting the idea that arguments are intrinsically rational, and emotion the enemy of effective argumentation.

A Valid argument may be rational, but look that up in the dictionary if you haven't already. I know you got one. It doesn't say anything about only pure-blood Vulcans arguing, Dr. Spoc.

Yes, a VALID argument is rational.

Now, why are you pathologically incapable of even mentioning the topic you're derailing? Any topic you're derailing?

I'm not derailing, I'm saying you are either derailing or trying to push your lies by conflating misogyny with conservatism.

They aren't the same thing no matter how much feelz you have about it.

Our emotions don't make us wrong, they make us human.

A lot of times they do, there are endless examples of feels getting in the way of reality and fucking shit up.

 

[BotanyBoy]

They both equal hate, and we all know that hate is a cancer that eats at the soul.

Truth!!

“Fear is the path to the dark side…fear leads to anger…anger leads to hate…hate leads to suffering.” - Yoda, Jedi Master.

 

[psiberzerker]

In fact the more emotional the person making the argument, the poorer the argument is.

No. The emotion behind the argument has nothing to do with the truth behind it. Also, you just said that an argument isn't an argument, if it's emotional. Now it's the more emotional the argument? This is yet another way to invalidate me, and women incientally.

It's an incel tactic. They use it to invalidate feminists all the time.

If I ask you if you're pathologically incapable of mentioning the topic you're derailing, and your response is "I'm not derailing, you are!" without mentioning the topic you're derailing, you're not mentioning the topic you're derailing.

That, perfectly emotionless argument is invalid. It's not even Semantically valid. Ignoring the question, and returning with a strawman.

Now, if you're not defending incels, say something about them. Other than I'm wrong for talking about them. That wasn't the question.