Top-opolis

Netzach,

I also have to say that the hardest strain on any of the largely functional and cool relationships I've been in is living together, and that I'm always happiest when I see a person on weekends. Why did M and I get an apartment then? I don't regret it, I just sometimes miss my own space with my own stamp on it entirely, even if the stamp is unholy mess, it's MINE.

I like the idea of a lover who lives next door. Maybe in a duplex or something. That's the Hepburn solution, right?

-B
 
bridgeburner said:
I love the idea of a network. I haven't had one single best friend since I was in grade school. Why should the romantic ideal be based on such an immature model? You get different things from different things in non-sexual relationships, why should it suddenly be that one person is able to satisfy all your sexual and romantic needs?

That just doesn't make a whole lot of sense. If monogamy works for you, great! But if not, great!

Go and do your thing.

Someone just told me that "a fascination with polyamory was a sure sign of inability to commit to a relationship" and I said hell yes. Never again am I going to restrict the flow of my love to one person. The very word "commit" gives me hackles.
 
bridgeburner said:
Netzach,



I like the idea of a lover who lives next door. Maybe in a duplex or something. That's the Hepburn solution, right?

-B

Next door is a little bit close.

I'd like the less-needy, clingy, problematical ones to live within booty-call walking distance. The rest ranged out from me in an orbital pattern with distance in inverse proportion to their demandingness; some living airline distance away.:p :p
 
I imagine the person who told you that could not possibly have a job and a lover, or a child and a job, or a dog and a houseplant...the ability to commit to something completely null once you commit to anything else....a notion I find humorous when trotted out by those freaked out by the sluts among us.

I'm perfectly able to commit to things. I even have enough attention span to walk and chew gum and distinguish between a fuck friend and a lover.
 
Bump.

Rant:


I'm extremely disappointed in a video that I was really looking forward to. It's a futuristic Women in Prison (WiP) flick that seemed to promise lots of fun but failed to deliver.

I've seen this a LOT in sexploitation films and it bugs the shit out of me. I think some of it is due to lousy acting, but a great deal of it is due to lousy scripting and plotting. Why can't people get it right?

Frex: What is the point of having the main warden of a women's prison act like a flaming homosexual buffoon? There are a couple of scenes in the film where it is made clear that he is not uninterested in taking advantage of the women in his prison, but he's still this big, fruity guy who talks like a Queen and there is never any sense of sexual menace from him at all --- even when he's feeling up the heroine. It's very obviously a body double and you only see it in silhouette and all he does is half-heartedly grab her ass a couple times.

Of course, this is nothing compared to the swaggering idiotic menace of most of the girl gang-members in the film. They're supposed to be tough and domineering but they never really show any real dominant personalities ---- you get a lot of mouthy bitches who couldn't dominate a french poodle if it weren't in the script.

I suppose this will teach me not to try and get my fetish kicks from softcore sexploitation films, but still, what's the point in toying around with shit if you're not going to do it right? It isn't that hard to do it right. I think it's a fear of committment.

They want to make a WiP film but they don't want to make anyone uncomfortable so they fudge and satisfy no one. Why not make a film and be comfortable that some people just won't like it? I mean, if Aunt Martha doesn't want to see naked, chained women pulling a train then she shouldn't be renting films with titles like Caged Heat 3000. Honestly!

But if somebody does rent a film called Caged Heat 3000 and it stars a Playmate and the back of the box talks about how much everyone is trying to get into her pants all the time then, dammit, I want to see it! Don't give me half-hearted ass grabbing by fat queens in silver bathrobes. If you're going to go to the trouble of fliming a gang rape and putting the actress through it then don't show it to me grainy, out of focus and cut to ribbons. Just fucking show me---- it's why I rented the movie in the first place you idiots!


Or perhaps, I'm just more of a pervert than they meant to market to?

Whatever. I'm mad and I will pout until I don't feel like pouting any more.


/rant

-B

P.S. Oh, and Happy New Year btw!
 
I just looked through the entire "Fetish" inventory of my local smut factory. Women dominating men, women in latex, women in carefully thought out and structured scenes involving lots of clothespins and "You will be begging me for more!" dialogue. Where are the women getting smacked repeatedly in the face and taking it like a whore? Where is the real degradation and unapologetic sadism? Are they not allowed to make those, or am I just searching in the wrong state? Graag. I feel your poutitude, bb.

rosco, awhile ago you asked for good violent hentai. Did you find anything else of worth?
 
You can always rent GI Jane and watch a shaved Demi Moore eating out of a garbage can.

*shrug*

Works for me.
 
To newcomers, what the fuck is this thread?

this thread is about all the perversions and debased leanings that do NOT fall under traditional 'dominance' and 'submission' labels, esp. insofar as those selfsaid 'doms' and 'subs' claim to offer respect or selffulfillment to a person that is basically the object of one's evil, selfish or asocial urges.

welcome,

J.
 
Is that it? I thought it was just where people with some badass and weird fantasies got together for mutual hugs and circlejerk.

I don't heap my selfish and asocial self out onto every bottom I find, but I'll tell you one thing, if I find another D/s site that looks like a Hallmark design I'll go postal.
 
you're asocial self does not need to be heaped to do its work.

:rose:

scalpel, m'dear?
 
Quint said:
Where are the women getting smacked repeatedly in the face and taking it like a whore? Where is the real degradation and unapologetic sadism? Are they not allowed to make those, or am I just searching in the wrong state? Graag. I feel your poutitude, bb.

rosco, awhile ago you asked for good violent hentai. Did you find anything else of worth?

Really, you might as well just go with rocco and Max.

There's probably a fortune to be made in the cinematization of my fantasies.

Q, I have been far too busy staring at my ceiling to do anything strenous like look for porn.
 
Quint,

I recommend Urotsukidoji: Legend of the Overfiend --- but you have to get the right version otherwise it's incomprehensible and edited to hell.

Unlike a lot of hentai that I've seen (not really all that much but enough that I feel confident in making a judgement) Urotsukidoji has a fairly interesting and well-done plot. I mean, it's still hentai, but I found it far more compelling than the all-hailed Akira which bored me to tears when I wasn't laughing in derision.

I was extremely disappointed to find I had an edited version of Kite with all the sexy bits taken out. This one also had a decent plot, however, so I will continue my search for an unedited version.

Cool Devices has some good stuff, but it feels a bit dated and sometimes the animation is sub-par. I got very excited during one episode where it seemed that our heroine was going to be made to service an entire shop full of leering drooling men. She does, but you don't see as much of it as you want to.

Besides, you get the impression that she likes it and that's not really my bag. I mean, yeah, it has it's place, but, honestly, there's too much "rape me so good, big fella" stuff.

I recently rented the first episode of Imma Yogu and it had great potential but lacked real penetration shots --- or they were edited out. Hard to tell sometimes.

So I keep looking. What I'd really like to find is a video store that specializes in these films. I want to rent, not buy --- unless I find a film worth buying. It's too expensive to buy sight unseen and just hope for the best.

Jeeze, I live in LA. I'm sure this stuff is around I just have to be braver about finding it. I hate the weird looks I get when I walk up to the counter with a bunch of this ultra-un PC stuff.


-B
 
Rosco,

From what I've read I'd definitely pay money to see some of your fantasies enacted on film.

I'm coming to the conclusion that if I want to see what I really want to see, then I'm going to have to find a way to produce it myself.


-B
 
if I find another D/s site that looks like a Hallmark design I'll go postal.


Hear! Hear!


I saw some interesting Trailer Dom footage once. Hard to get past the "Yayus Master Danyul" and the mullet/mustache combo on the Dom, but he did give her over to his ugly neighbor before whipping her pussy and then torturing her with hot wax on all her little pink bits. Nice bit of amateur vid.


-B
 
What one really wants to see on the face of someone being raped or forced to perform acts of forcible oral servitude, ie for the leering masses, is horror and woe.

There's a strong split in me.While my cock and balls thrill to such ideas, I would be unbearably sad if I actually made someone feel like this.

It is not easy to require, as jacking fodder, images that betoken karmic suicide. In order to achieve satisfactory orgasms, I must disable my moral compass.

Perhaps something else is going on here...the subconcious reminding me that horror and woe are as important to the functioning of things as anything else.
 
In order to achieve satisfactory orgasms, I must disable my moral compass.

I hear you. But can't one hope to run into, occasionally, an object/prey/other of similarly disabled compass?

What one really wants to see on the face of someone...is horror and woe.

Do it not help the conscience that this face, in story or in photos, is not (usually) an actual person in actual, real woe?
 
I think that's why humans create fiction - to explore things that we have a dinosaur-brain need for even though they make the modern conscience shudder. I mean, who doesn't love Conan's list of what is good in life?

"To crush your enemy, see him driven before you and hear the lamentation of his women."

Does thrilling over this line make one a likely candidate for Marauders R Us? It's a pretty basic human desire - to win, to conquer, to be the boss, to watch the bad guys suffer for all they've done to you.


I get tired of the Thought Police and their insistance that if you fantasize about an act you are not only capable but likely to perform such an act at the slightest opportunity.

It's one of the more ridiculous things I've ever heard.

What I can't figure out is if people are uncomfortable because they have those urges themselves and think to mediate their guilty consciences by denouncing others or if they're so simple minded that they truly believe fantasies are wishes waiting to become reality.

Grrrrrr.



-B
 
Prize goes to whoever can tell, without looking it up, who actually said the quote used by Conan.....

There ARE no porns with the look I need;see discussion above.

My fiction has been undergoing a mini-revival; thanks pure & bridge for the commentary.
 
By the way, rampaging, raping, baby-impaling marauder would be my ideal job description; whether Viking, Mongol or Goth.
 
Hmmmm.....I'd never heard it before it was in the movie. In the film it's taught to him by his owner when he's a gladiator slave after being promoted from grist-mill-turning slave.


I feel your pain about the lack of porn with the right look.



-B
 
Sorry, I just got an image of Rosco in black lipstick and a mohawk wielding a battle axe.


I know, I know, NOT that kind of Goth.


-B
 
Two handed sword, weilded one handed. (I am big)...giant black horse...horned helm, clawlike gauntlets....black hooded cloak...horde of horny gnome like rapists in my wake...."save the Kings daugter for me, boys, and bring her to my yurt!"


aaaaaand it's off to geeksville we go
 
Back
Top