Top-opolis

[WriterDom]

So you have a cute side. The Dom Lounge served its purpose. Even though it has been dormant for nine months, if I had shamelessly bumped it up every day, I'm sure that it would kick Topfelloff in both views and posts. I just think you have real potential and could have an identity other than my troll if you worked at it.

 

[rosco rathbone]

So you have a cute side. The Dom Lounge served its purpose. Even though it has been dormant for nine months, if I had shamelessly bumped it up every day, I'm sure that it would kick Topfelloff in both views and posts. I just think you have real potential and could have an identity other than my troll if you worked at it.

Negro, please. The Dom Lounge slid off the charts because you really don't have anything to say. Although you are knowledgeable and thoughtful on pervy issues, you've no charisma.

I'm sure that you could turn the ol' DL into one of the regular ersatz-chat-rooms if you felt like it; but so what? There's no point to an archived chat-room. Topopolis shall always thrive, and be consulted by the youth, because it is full of juice. Ideas, dreams, fantasy, originality, humor, thought-provoking discussion. Simply put, Topopolis is where the bdsm elite meet to eat and greet.

That said, your term as my straw-man and bdsm whipping boy is up, I think. Pure took the wind out of my sails when he called you a "sensitive mild sadist". Now I see your chubby flogger arm and feel like kicking a can, aw shucks, I never shoulda been mean to the guy. @#$% male menopause making me all weepy.

 

[WriterDom]

Negro, please. The Dom Lounge slid off the charts because you really don't have anything to say. Although you are knowledgeable and thoughtful on pervy issues, you've no charisma.

I'm sure that you could turn the ol' DL into one of the regular ersatz-chat-rooms if you felt like it; but so what? There's no point to an archived chat-room. Topopolis shall always thrive, and be consulted by the youth, because it is full of juice. Ideas, dreams, fantasy, originality, humor, thought-provoking discussion. Simply put, Topopolis is where the bdsm elite meet to eat and greet.

That said, your term as my straw-man and bdsm whipping boy is up, I think. Pure took the wind out of my sails when he called you a "sensitive mild sadist". Now I see your chubby flogger arm and feel like kicking a can, aw shucks, I never shoulda been mean to the guy. @#$% male menopause making me all weepy.

I have struck a heavy Nerve. Continue to honor me with your av, bitch.

 

[Ebonyfire]

As you must be aware, my man, thread popularity-which as we all know is measured by number of flirtatious, emoticon-laden posts by people such as Fungi Ungi, Miss Taken, Ebonyfire and James G5; as well as the lumpenproletariat of faceless, personality-free female sumbissives-was never my aim. I quote from my preamble to this Topopolis thread of ours....

".....Thus, I have created Topopolis as an alternative to the Dominate's Lounge and a forum for anyone else who feels like me.
If there are no such people here, I will just carry on tal++++ to myself, safe in the confines of the Topopolis city limits."

Now be a sport, Nick, and admit that my little four-sided conversation with Nutsack, Pure, Evesdream and the QBF is considerably more interesting and idea-laden than your ol' Dom Lounge ever was. Perhaps I shall even take down the No-Nick Stone Zone sign and let you come play, as token dominate master.

Leave MY name out of your mudfest. Rosco.

You thread is about as interesting as any or all science fiction.

 

[WriterDom]

. Pure took

pure is a bigger joke than you. As hard as that is to believe

 

[Ebonyfire]

Negro, please. The Dom Lounge slid off the charts because you really don't have anything to say. Although you are knowledgeable and thoughtful on pervy issues, you've no charisma.

I'm sure that you could turn the ol' DL into one of the regular ersatz-chat-rooms if you felt like it; but so what? There's no point to an archived chat-room. Topopolis shall always thrive, and be consulted by the youth, because it is full of juice. Ideas, dreams, fantasy, originality, humor, thought-provo++++ discussion. Simply put, Topopolis is where the bdsm elite meet to eat and greet.

That said, your term as my straw-man and bdsm whipping boy is up, I think. Pure took the wind out of my sails when he called you a "sensitive mild sadist". Now I see your chubby flogger arm and feel like kic++++ a can, aw shucks, I never shoulda been mean to the guy. @#$% male menopause ma++++ me all weepy.

Negro please?

 

[Ebonyfire]

Negro please?

There is nothing like a white boy trying to talk black that resonates the word "bullshit".

 

[rosco rathbone]

I have struck a heavy Nerve. Continue to honor me with your av, bitch.

Ho ho! Up on the old hind legs, eh Nicholas?


giggle.

You've no charisma, brother. No flair. But I have been overly mean to you and I am sorry.

 

[Ebonyfire]

pure is a bigger joke than you. As hard as that is to believe

I have to agree with ya there.

 

[WriterDom]

but mommy says...

 

[zipman]

Negro, please. The Dom Lounge slid off the charts because you really don't have anything to say. Although you are knowledgeable and thoughtful on pervy issues, you've no charisma.

I'm sure that you could turn the ol' DL into one of the regular ersatz-chat-rooms if you felt like it; but so what? There's no point to an archived chat-room. Topopolis shall always thrive, and be consulted by the youth, because it is full of juice. Ideas, dreams, fantasy, originality, humor, thought-provoking discussion. Simply put, Topopolis is where the bdsm elite meet to eat and greet.

That said, your term as my straw-man and bdsm whipping boy is up, I think. Pure took the wind out of my sails when he called you a "sensitive mild sadist". Now I see your chubby flogger arm and feel like kicking a can, aw shucks, I never shoulda been mean to the guy. @#$% male menopause making me all weepy.

Roscoe has Charisma?

As for this being the place where the bdsm elite meet to eat and greet, then I must be reading the wrong thread. I've enjoyed some of the posts made by the non-regulars, but for me, I've grown tired of your blurty-style anger management issues and Pure's deconstructing every post for this thread to be an enjoyable read.

Be well!

 

[Pure]

Making arguments that this is, or is not, a substantial and interesting thread is a waste of time. The proof of the pudding is in what's here (leaving aside my stuff, ftsoa): 100s of interesting postings, made by dozens of posters, and enjoyed by a great many people as shown in the 'views'.

Passing visitors' critiques, should be treated as in any other thread, as either ignorant, and whether or not intended, as lapses of common courtesy.

It's pretty calm, here, too,and there's a reason: this area is generally free of the usual strutting, but so-vulnerable, 'empathic' cyberdom/mes {and their OAOs and worshippers} who cannot bear anything but Hosannas. Zip being one of the few exceptions to the rule. Further he and Eb share the common charcteristic of being gracious and beneficent to the non-elect. These two take their valuable time to drop by, read a bit, and inform the lowly and unscrubbed how boring they are.

 

[zipman]

Making arguments that this is, or is not, a substantial and interesting thread is a waste of time. The proof of the pudding is in what's here (leaving aside my stuff, ftsoa): 100s of interesting postings, made by dozens of posters, and enjoyed by a great many people as shown in the 'views'.

Passing visitors' critiques, should be treated as in any other thread, as either ignorant, and whether or not intended, as lapses of common courtesy.

It's pretty calm, here, and there's a reason: this area is generally free of the usual strutting, but so-vulnerable, 'empathic' cyberdom/mes {and their OAOs and worshippers} who cannot bear anything but Hosannas. Zip being one of the few exceptions to the rule. Further he and Eb share the common charcteristic of being gracious and beneficent to the non-elect. These two take their valuable time to drop by, read a bit, and inform the lowly and unscrubbed how boring they are.

I forgot to mention how accepting you are of alternate views.

You can classify me as a Daddy-Dom or any other way that you want, it wouldn't be the first time you were wrong about me. The truth is, my thoughts and feelings change with the posts I read and the introspection that I bring to my life.

Obviously, as I am not a regular poster on the thread, I am not one of the "bdsm elite" and therefore, my opinions are not valid.

How many posts does it take to reach elite status, or must one first swear that they do not care at all for their subs before being accepted here. My sub is my fiancee, so I do care for her well-being, both in and out of the bedroom.

If that makes me persona non grata, then so be it!

 

[Quint]

Blithely ignoring everything...

Someone who takes herself as seriously as I do is a prime target for "bad" humiliation. I've been pondering--sure, I call myself a humiliation slut, but if I'm picky or controlling about anything that happens to me, it's humiliation. Pain I take in whatever form T wants to give, up until I simply can't take anymore. Yet I've spelled out the differences between "good" and "bad" humiliation and feel like there's a stern uberdisciplinary-type Jiminy Cricket on T's shoulder, making sure he never crosses that tangible line.

Examples to break up the ramble.

I'm told to call myself a cunt. My voice trembles but I'll do it--the word is harsh still, but sexy in my mind. Same thing with slut, whore, bitch. I can do those. I'll blush a little, squirm a little, and move on. Even with the addition of uglier words (filthy, worthless, sick) I'll get through it--I don't really believe them and they are easy to say.

Now let's say I'm told to call myself a twat. I don't like that word. I don't like it at all. I doubt I've ever said it comfortably. It makes me feel childish and very unsexy. Definitely humiliated. No enjoyment whatsoever on my end.

What about laughter? Why is it pleasurable in a dirty, shameful way for T to laugh in my face because he's just slapped me and I can't do anything about it? Yet if I'm trying to be sexy and trip and fall, I do NOT want to be laughed at. That reduces me to a small, insecure child.

That's what I get coming from Rosco. The obscenely childish, the ridiculous or bordering on, the "bad" humiliation. That which would require me to lose my sense of self--because it's a self that I take very seriously. I talk with T about being pushed and hurt and humiliated until I lose my "I." That would be it for me.

Maybe it's better on that side. I'll let you all know when I get there.

 

[Pure]

Quint,
incredibly well said, and moving.



you're into the essence of sm and areas little talked about, making your own way. ever read St. John of the Cross?

 

[rosco rathbone]

Blithely ignoring everything...

Someone who takes herself as seriously as I do is a prime target for "bad" humiliation. I've been pondering--sure, I call myself a humiliation slut, but if I'm picky or controlling about anything that happens to me, it's humiliation. Pain I take in whatever form T wants to give, up until I simply can't take anymore. Yet I've spelled out the differences between "good" and "bad" humiliation and feel like there's a stern uberdisciplinary-type Jiminy Cricket on T's shoulder, making sure he never crosses that tangible line.

Examples to break up the ramble.

I'm told to call myself a cunt. My voice trembles but I'll do it--the word is harsh still, but sexy in my mind. Same thing with slut, whore, bitch. I can do those. I'll blush a little, squirm a little, and move on. Even with the addition of uglier words (filthy, worthless, sick) I'll get through it--I don't really believe them and they are easy to say.

Now let's say I'm told to call myself a twat. I don't like that word. I don't like it at all. I doubt I've ever said it comfortably. It makes me feel childish and very unsexy. Definitely humiliated. No enjoyment whatsoever on my end.

What about laughter? Why is it pleasurable in a dirty, shameful way for T to laugh in my face because he's just slapped me and I can't do anything about it? Yet if I'm trying to be sexy and trip and fall, I do NOT want to be laughed at. That reduces me to a small, insecure child.

That's what I get coming from Rosco. The obscenely childish, the ridiculous or bordering on, the "bad" humiliation. That which would require me to lose my sense of self--because it's a self that I take very seriously. I talk with T about being pushed and hurt and humiliated until I lose my "I." That would be it for me.

Maybe it's better on that side. I'll let you all know when I get there.

Just reading George Orwell essay on the humiliations of his school-days "Such, Such , Such Were The Joys" that totally reminds me of this.

 

[Pure]

from a list of pervy Jap'y fetish activities (thanks perdita)

why did I think of Top when I read this.

------
http://www.harmful.org/homedespot/Adictionary.html

GANMEN KOOGEKI- (ganmen 'face' + koogeki 'attack') - seen in catfighting and s/m play. . . a 'face attack' involves the sadist smooshing the cheeks or hooking their fingers in the nostrils of the masochist, to give her a 'pig nose'. . . or other, more creative ways to deform the woman's face. The point of 'face attack' is to make a beautiful woman ashamed, by making her face look ugly.

------

 

[rosco rathbone]

Uglifying and shaming the beautiful-that's hot.

 

[Quint]

The female orgasm.

What is its place and value, if any? Discuss.

 

[evesdream]

The female orgasm.

What is its place and value, if any? Discuss.

I would say "sound and fury signifying nothing", Quint but i'd just be playing teacher's pet.
I really think that the female O in the context of the decidedly unloving rough sex we like...is the paradox of our times.
What do YOU think?

 

[Caitlynne]

I would say "sound and fury signifying nothing", Quint but i'd just be playing teacher's pet.
I really think that the female O in the context of the decidedly unloving rough sex we like...is the paradox of our times.
What do YOU think?

Ah another teacher's pet!

I'd have to agree, the paradox of our times, given the context.

 

[Impish]

The female orgasm.

What is its place and value, if any? Discuss.

Positive reinforcement, the continuation of easier procreation.

 

[Pure]

O (f)

It provides for a means of control: gives the sadistic, imperious partner and father/mother figure something to withhold, to deprive or otherwise torture; to use for manipulations and mindfucking.

 

[Caitlynne]

O (f)

It provides for a means of control: gives the sadistic, imperious partner and father/mother figure something to withhold, to deprive or otherwise torture; to use for manipulations and mindfucking.

Well yes, there is that!

 

[Pure]

O (f)


It's a real puzzle since most animals don't seem to have/need orgasms; reproduction carries on; one presumes it's not unpleasant to copulate.

I bet most of us here were conceived without female orgasm; pretty likely your parents were. So what the hell is this thing that isn't even so absolutely common now, if you read some of the younger posters who are honest?

Another avenue by which a woman may become a bacchante? a way to frenzy that aint necessary but has less hangover.

A last thought is that probably the majority of occurences are solitary, as with men. So I wouldn't stress the 'bonding' function very much.