rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
i KNOW they are straight. I'm not into lesbians-just girls that have that lesbionic, righteous, hippy-punk vibe. With advanced degrees.
Top-opolis
- Thread starter rosco rathbone
- Start date
Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
A Netzach? I don't get a title, just a Netzach?
Temple Whore? Royal consort? Most-Valuable-Terrorist? Chair of the subcommittee on gender abberation? Nooooo...not even van driver.
I don't know about Jew vs. Aryan cosmologies, but I definitely always thought there was something distinctly ecumenical Xtian about transgression/punishment/there don't we feel better now D/s dynamics.
That never made sense to me. When I was a submissive, I was much more comfortable being beaten because I liked it, being beaten because the Top felt like it being beaten because I *was there.*
The Job story releases us from this sense of boy-scout morality, be good and good things happen, you get heaven-points and gold stars.
No, you just be as good as you can because you should, and that's it, you still might end up fucked over or, at worst, someone's bar of soap.
In an Xtian sensibility the bars of soap deserved theirs somehow, the poor sinners. Majorly creepy.
Temple Whore? Royal consort? Most-Valuable-Terrorist? Chair of the subcommittee on gender abberation? Nooooo...not even van driver.
I don't know about Jew vs. Aryan cosmologies, but I definitely always thought there was something distinctly ecumenical Xtian about transgression/punishment/there don't we feel better now D/s dynamics.
That never made sense to me. When I was a submissive, I was much more comfortable being beaten because I liked it, being beaten because the Top felt like it being beaten because I *was there.*
The Job story releases us from this sense of boy-scout morality, be good and good things happen, you get heaven-points and gold stars.
No, you just be as good as you can because you should, and that's it, you still might end up fucked over or, at worst, someone's bar of soap.
In an Xtian sensibility the bars of soap deserved theirs somehow, the poor sinners. Majorly creepy.
Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
rosco rathbone said:
Ok, ok, I'll stop being glib. Although I think if you were not attracted to her you'd be mental or totally gay.
I don't know. Is this a recent development? I've always been primarily attracted to this subset of human species - sex female.
They are high maintenance emotionally, but definitely keep you on your toes intellectually. They are wonderfully crumbly in the bedroom if you push a bit, which they don't want you to know.
They never get pushed by the boys of their peer group (human species, sex male, indie rock twerp prototype) and realize that other girls may be more alpha. Older butch men are either:
A. scary but neat
or
B. Gross.
Danger Will Robinson: as they approach 30, some will be very life-partner oriented, and this can create frenzy. Bad bad frenzy. Some have this crisis early (mine was at 26) and it usually irons itself out in a few years, thereby paving a path of potentially OK life partnerships to actually occur.
I think you like them for the same reasons I like them other than the hottie factor:
advanced degrees and too much internal speculation and self-absorbtion make me wet.
I also like a girl who could be a boy for me if I wanted her to. Flexibility is a must.
rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
See, this is the inside information I'm getting here. The good stuff.
It has often been poignant for me to fall into the "potentially scary-yet-neat; yet considerably more likely to be just-plain-gross" category with the chicks I dig. That is why I never approach people who seem attractive from afar. I've learned from too many burns that those aren't the ones I'll end up with.
I had a feeling you might know exactly the kind of girl I was talking about.
As far as your town title, I don't know yet. Since I am on jews this week, maybe you could be the Town Overbearing Jewish Mother? Have to meditate upon it after TOrah class today.
It has often been poignant for me to fall into the "potentially scary-yet-neat; yet considerably more likely to be just-plain-gross" category with the chicks I dig. That is why I never approach people who seem attractive from afar. I've learned from too many burns that those aren't the ones I'll end up with.
I had a feeling you might know exactly the kind of girl I was talking about.
As far as your town title, I don't know yet. Since I am on jews this week, maybe you could be the Town Overbearing Jewish Mother? Have to meditate upon it after TOrah class today.
rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
Well since the hat fits then you shall wear it. I hereby dub you town jewish overbearing dominatress mother with all rights and privileges heretofore pertaining.
rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
Sitting in an exhausted trance at work today, I began to speculate on the mysteries of sexual disgust. I have noticed that my personal definition of "attractive" has been expanding very rapidly in the last several years. Women that I once would have found fat and therefore foul now seem do-able.
Once, I only wanted to fuck beauty queens because it was very important to my ego. I had a lot of bad sex with a lot of pretty faces.
But today, my mind really started wandering. If I can be into fucking fat bitches, why not guys? WIth hairy asses and all. Why not, in fact, anything with a warm orifice? I am not joking; this was the trend of my specualtions. I even looked over at Ritchie, my 60-year-old partner and thought.." why not"?? If you close your eyes, an orifice is an orifice. The rest is all mental.
I was thinking of the scene in Blood Meridian where the Apaches rape the asses of their fallen enemies. It seemed so disgusting. Who'd want to have sex with the butt of some dying, bloody, hairy, unbathed man? But why not?
Once, I only wanted to fuck beauty queens because it was very important to my ego. I had a lot of bad sex with a lot of pretty faces.
But today, my mind really started wandering. If I can be into fucking fat bitches, why not guys? WIth hairy asses and all. Why not, in fact, anything with a warm orifice? I am not joking; this was the trend of my specualtions. I even looked over at Ritchie, my 60-year-old partner and thought.." why not"?? If you close your eyes, an orifice is an orifice. The rest is all mental.
I was thinking of the scene in Blood Meridian where the Apaches rape the asses of their fallen enemies. It seemed so disgusting. Who'd want to have sex with the butt of some dying, bloody, hairy, unbathed man? But why not?
rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
Interesting:
If there was such a thing as a hardcore "2nd Wave" feminist sumbissive; it seems almost certain that she would require as dominate-master a man of perfect character. One who avoided every single typical male patriarchal fault; or at least acted the part well.
If there was such a thing as a hardcore "2nd Wave" feminist sumbissive; it seems almost certain that she would require as dominate-master a man of perfect character. One who avoided every single typical male patriarchal fault; or at least acted the part well.
Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
rosco rathbone said:
You are a twisted fucking fuck. I enjoy it to the core. If I could spooge I like to think I'd be like you.
Wartime necro-fucking could there be any more ultimate hatefuck?
A new orientation: reptile-brain-driven-bisexuality. Bonobo bisexuality. It was there, it had to be fucked.
rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
Re: Bump
My favorites can have other titles.
Pats her head affectionately and patronistico-mayorially.
Netzach said:
My favorites can have other titles.
Pats her head affectionately and patronistico-mayorially.
Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
You've been waiting to do that since I got here, haven't you?
So? <i> nu? </i>
Any bilous jacking? Any sick insight? I'm coming down with a cold and I'm sick of playing the part of Dagny Taggart in the scarlet A threads.
My fiance's tits arrived today, in the mail. I've not had much experience with X dressing up close, to be totally honest. That actually surprises me. The tits are really nice, I'm amazed at their versimilitude. He makes a lovely girl, the tits, being the investment they are, were one of the things we waited before getting.
He jacked off as soon as they arrived. There's a litmus test, if something still sounds good after jacking off to the idea it's a real desire. Tits passed the test, the PA pierce did not. Although I think a PA is still floating around the deep sea of his conscience, he may take a year to want it again, but probably will.
I thought about his M/m encounters just now and I realized he's also the other woman. I'm marrying another homewrecker.
M de Sade and Bataille would approve, no doubt. I think so anyway.
So? <i> nu? </i>
Any bilous jacking? Any sick insight? I'm coming down with a cold and I'm sick of playing the part of Dagny Taggart in the scarlet A threads.
My fiance's tits arrived today, in the mail. I've not had much experience with X dressing up close, to be totally honest. That actually surprises me. The tits are really nice, I'm amazed at their versimilitude. He makes a lovely girl, the tits, being the investment they are, were one of the things we waited before getting.
He jacked off as soon as they arrived. There's a litmus test, if something still sounds good after jacking off to the idea it's a real desire. Tits passed the test, the PA pierce did not. Although I think a PA is still floating around the deep sea of his conscience, he may take a year to want it again, but probably will.
I thought about his M/m encounters just now and I realized he's also the other woman. I'm marrying another homewrecker.
M de Sade and Bataille would approve, no doubt. I think so anyway.
Pure
Fiel a Verdad
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2001
- Posts
- 15,135
Ms. Netzach:
This town doesn't really deal with self conferred titles, but as Rabbi, I do believe your contribution to amorality and sexual warfare deserves some acknowledgement, at least in the religious sphere.
The town's synagogue has a number of Leagues, like the Hadassah, and local 'chapters' of national groups. I'd be happy if you became Head Jezebel in the League of Unruly Clitorises, and in the local Topopolis chapter of the Society of the Abrahamic Dildo, Chief Curator of Ark of Sexual Artifacts.
Please note that this is a religiously based conferring and office, not having to do with the civil administration and mayoralty of the town.
J
This town doesn't really deal with self conferred titles, but as Rabbi, I do believe your contribution to amorality and sexual warfare deserves some acknowledgement, at least in the religious sphere.
The town's synagogue has a number of Leagues, like the Hadassah, and local 'chapters' of national groups. I'd be happy if you became Head Jezebel in the League of Unruly Clitorises, and in the local Topopolis chapter of the Society of the Abrahamic Dildo, Chief Curator of Ark of Sexual Artifacts.
Please note that this is a religiously based conferring and office, not having to do with the civil administration and mayoralty of the town.
J
Last edited:
Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
*LMAO*
Needed that, thank you.
Personally, I consider the golden stream I direct at holy matrimony my greatest oeuvre, comparable to the hateful jizz toward the Mom of RR. I even included a line in a work I made about wanting to fuck a married woman:
"I wanted to fuck her marriage. I wanted to fuck her marriage hard. I wanted to fuck her marriage till the paint on the walls peeled, and the neighbors called up to complain."
The consummation of this piss, will be, of course, my own marraige. I see this as the culmination of the war with the beast, the final showdown, and ultimately my triumph over it. If I engage in it, it can only bend to my will.
Needed that, thank you.
Personally, I consider the golden stream I direct at holy matrimony my greatest oeuvre, comparable to the hateful jizz toward the Mom of RR. I even included a line in a work I made about wanting to fuck a married woman:
"I wanted to fuck her marriage. I wanted to fuck her marriage hard. I wanted to fuck her marriage till the paint on the walls peeled, and the neighbors called up to complain."
The consummation of this piss, will be, of course, my own marraige. I see this as the culmination of the war with the beast, the final showdown, and ultimately my triumph over it. If I engage in it, it can only bend to my will.
rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
Netzach said:
rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
Qlipotic Times Despatch late ed.
"Smileys at large in topopolis"
Some smileys were recently seen harrasing citizens of our fair city. They appear to hav eescaped in a jailbreak from the general dullnormalboard. Witnesses report both a regular smiley and his sidekick the infamous lickey frog. If you see these nasty characters report them at once. The mayor is on record saying "I dont know what the fuck overcame me, twas like a psychic viral infection that made me click on them".
Editor says: "We cannot have any smileys here. Ignore all previous use of smileys and lickey frogs by the oh so charismatic leadership and do not do as he does. No smileys and no chatting in topopolis. "
"Smileys at large in topopolis"
Some smileys were recently seen harrasing citizens of our fair city. They appear to hav eescaped in a jailbreak from the general dullnormalboard. Witnesses report both a regular smiley and his sidekick the infamous lickey frog. If you see these nasty characters report them at once. The mayor is on record saying "I dont know what the fuck overcame me, twas like a psychic viral infection that made me click on them".
Editor says: "We cannot have any smileys here. Ignore all previous use of smileys and lickey frogs by the oh so charismatic leadership and do not do as he does. No smileys and no chatting in topopolis. "
rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
rosco rathbone said:
mug shots of the suspects
qp9325yb12948y59134
and
e59086unyw[857
rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
the first blowjob
Although animals and even our primate ancestors are known to lick each other's parts- and there is no reason why their primitive nervous systems should not find this pleasurable-as far as I know; there are no observed instances in the animal kingdom of one animal organisming in the mouth of another. In other words, there had to be a first blowjob. Or perhaps blowjobs sprung up simultaneously in all corners of the primitive world; much as fire and tools are said to have done.
twas a brave (wo)man who first ate the oyster
The First Blowjob. Was it in caveman days? Or was some level of civilization necessary before man first required his mate to perform wifely duties and mouth a member? It certainly requires some notion of sex-as-pleasure; although on the other hand, I can imagine that primitive man might have had ideas about mana or mojo inherent in the cock and balls if not the seed itself, and so might have performed the first acts of oral servitude as a primitive religious or shamanic rite. Perhaps it was the Medicine Man-the first dominate master-for whom this act was reserved. (Pure speculation here).
Although animals and even our primate ancestors are known to lick each other's parts- and there is no reason why their primitive nervous systems should not find this pleasurable-as far as I know; there are no observed instances in the animal kingdom of one animal organisming in the mouth of another. In other words, there had to be a first blowjob. Or perhaps blowjobs sprung up simultaneously in all corners of the primitive world; much as fire and tools are said to have done.
twas a brave (wo)man who first ate the oyster
The First Blowjob. Was it in caveman days? Or was some level of civilization necessary before man first required his mate to perform wifely duties and mouth a member? It certainly requires some notion of sex-as-pleasure; although on the other hand, I can imagine that primitive man might have had ideas about mana or mojo inherent in the cock and balls if not the seed itself, and so might have performed the first acts of oral servitude as a primitive religious or shamanic rite. Perhaps it was the Medicine Man-the first dominate master-for whom this act was reserved. (Pure speculation here).
