Britva415
"Alabaster," my ass
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2022
- Posts
- 6,751
And they say the Oxford (read: unnecessary) Capital is for enhancing clarity.I for real thought there was such a thing as like a Polandish manicure or something we were talking about.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And they say the Oxford (read: unnecessary) Capital is for enhancing clarity.I for real thought there was such a thing as like a Polandish manicure or something we were talking about.
Curious that there are Proper Adjectives, but not Proper Adverbs. We don’t have Polishly, Germanly, or Americanly.I think it's one of those Proper Adjectives. The capitalization gives it away to me.
GrammarlyCurious that there are Proper Adjectives, but not Proper Adverbs. We don’t have Polishly, Germanly, or Americanly.
Right, I suppose all the foo.ly startups realized you could do this back in the Roaring Ruby-on-Rails 2010s.Grammarly
Except most of them weren't capitalized even though they were proper names!Right, I suppose all the foo.ly startups realized you could do this back in the Roaring Ruby-on-Rails 2010s.
But they sure were venture-capitalized!Except most of them weren't capitalized even though they were proper names!
As well as Pierogly, Bratwurstly, and Croissantly.Yankily?
Pointed what?Reworded?
"I lifted my short dress, pulled my thong aside and freed my rigid cock. My freshly-manicured nails glittered as I pointed it at my naked sisters." (I'm assuming you already told the reader the speaker has two sisters earlier in the story. If this is the opening line, you might or might not have to drop that in.)
It wouldn't be, It would be well into the story after a lot of detail in how they got there.If it's the opening line,
A missing Oxford comma in a Maine labor law cost a dairy a $5 million settlement regarding overtime.Back in the dark ages, I was taught the following with respect to lists and commas. A comma is NOT needed before the word “and.”
I wore a blouse and skirt. No comma needed. I believe most everyone would agree with this.
I wore a hat, a blouse and skirt. Only one comma needed to separate hat and blouse. The word “and” separates the blouse/skirt pair already, thus a comma is not needed before the “and.”
Now, I know that I will get slammed for this, but if you look at why the comma is there in the first place, the logic and instructions from my junior high school English teacher do make sense.
I will go to my bunker now.
It occurs to me that pointing one penis at two people is interesting, unless it bifurcates. "Pointed it at Lucy, then at Marilyn"?It wouldn't be, It would be well into the story after a lot of detail in how they got there.
I'm sure other people put in good suggestions, but I'm too lazy to read them right now.It wouldn't be, It would be well into the story after a lot of detail in how they got there.
With as much intact as possible:'With my freshly manicured hand, I lifted my short dress, pulled my thong aside, freed my rigid cock and pointed it at my two naked sisters.'
Brother snake pointing his hemipenes at his naked sisters, obviously.It occurs to me that pointing one penis at two people is interesting, unless it bifurcates. "Pointed it at Lucy, then at Marilyn"?
Brother snake pointing his hemipenes at his naked sisters, obviously.
More likely: General direction, sisters huddled together.
But I'd definitely be more interested in hemipenes. That's just me, though. And we all know what sort of smut I like.*
*Snakes.
"Our spelling may be stupid and have many, many letters that you don't pronounce, but at least we're consistent (mostly) in how we spell stupidly."This is why English is such a stupid language and we should all speak French.
The two sisters could be really, really close. Entwined even ...It occurs to me that pointing one penis at two people is interesting, unless it bifurcates. "Pointed it at Lucy, then at Marilyn"?
You're just not using the stack properly.Physics come before commas.
You can't point one cock at two sisters.
I sense you might be advocating for abusing some compiler internals that will result in undefined behavior. I’d suggest one not be clever and simply make an array of sisters and point at its first element.You're just not using the stack properly.
Common programming mistake.
Nah, you set up a message queue identifying both sisters as readers post your cock to the queue and both sisters can access it. It then falls to them to fight over who gets to read the message. Hopefully, brother is capable of posting more than just the one message.I sense you might be advocating for abusing some compiler internals that will result in undefined behavior. I’d suggest one not be clever and simply make an array of sisters and point at its first element.