lovetopleasewomen
81%er
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2012
- Posts
- 36,123
4 game suspension nullified in federal court. As it should have been.
This was a frame from the get go.
This was a frame from the get go.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Chances are it will get re-instated on appeal
Chances are it will get re-instated on appeal
And . . . I hope that the Pats then have to forfeit any game he played in.
Chances are it will get re-instated on appeal
This whole thing was a set up from the get go.Berman has a low rate of having his cases successfully appealed. His rulings are carefully crafted to avoid them. That said, it could happen. Of course there was no merit to the actual investigation so this is more a question of whether the union can give Goodell the ability to railroad any player he chooses.
Berman has a low rate of having his cases successfully appealed. His rulings are carefully crafted to avoid them. That said, it could happen. Of course there was no merit to the actual investigation so this is more a question of whether the union can give Goodell the ability to railroad any player he chooses.
He is certainly is not above the rules. I just haven't seen any evidence he did anything wrong. All I've heard is..."maybe, more probably then not" ......What's the point in having any rules at all if they can be broken without consequence?
It's like raising kids, or having laws. There needs to be a negative consequence for willful misconduct. In baseball, if you cork a bat or throw a spitter and you're caught, there are suspensions. Why shouldn't there be for Tom Brady - I really don't know why he, his owner and Boston fans feel that he's somehow above the rule book.
What's the point in having any rules at all if they can be broken without consequence?
It's like raising kids, or having laws. There needs to be a negative consequence for willful misconduct. In baseball, if you cork a bat or throw a spitter and you're caught, there are suspensions. Why shouldn't there be for Tom Brady - I really don't know why he, his owner and Boston fans feel that he's somehow above the rule book.
I doubt anyone believes that two parttime equipment employees deflated game balls without some sort of encouragement from the quarterback, particularly one as demanding as Brady. That said, the only question that Judge Berman should have ruled on is did the league follow the disciplinary format in the Collective Bargaining Agreement that both the owners and players agreed to. An agreement by the way, that only the players from one team, the Pittsburgh Steelers, rejected because they felt it gave the commissioner too much power. And the head negotiator for the owners: Robert Kraft.
And that's where the problems started. A loser of a player who doesn't start, who lost to the Patriots before & is losing to them again, catches a ball, the first one in who knows how long, and he decides something is wrong with the ball? And yet the officials, who handle the ball before and after each play, didn't notice anything?Berman's ruling was that it was implied that the Commissioner would implement discipline after due process and the league's prcocess was a joke.
Did the Patriot equipment guys also deflate the Colts balls? I mean before the game, not after the Pats lit up the Colts in the second half....after the balls were adjusted by the refs.
The question is did the league follow their procedure, not whether it was fair. It was an agreed upon procedure. And cheating has no basis in the result; if you cheated off the dumb kid in high school and got all wrong answers you still cheated.Berman's ruling was that it was implied that the Commissioner would implement discipline after due process and the league's prcocess was a joke.
Did the Patriot equipment guys also deflate the Colts balls? I mean before the game, not after the Pats lit up the Colts in the second half....after the balls were adjusted by the refs.
The question is did the league follow their procedure, not whether it was fair. It was an agreed upon procedure. And cheating has no basis in the result; if you cheated off the dumb kid in high school and got all wrong answers you still cheated.
Berman has a low rate of having his cases successfully appealed. His rulings are carefully crafted to avoid them. That said, it could happen. Of course there was no merit to the actual investigation so this is more a question of whether the union can give Goodell the ability to railroad any player he chooses.
The CBA grants him broad discretion...much broader than Berman seemed to acknowledge in his decision...taken to its logical conclusion, Berman seems to be saying unless something is explicitly written in the confines of the agreement the NFL has no ability to act...
And that's where the problems started. A loser of a player who doesn't start, who lost to the Patriots before & is losing to them again, catches a ball, the first one in who knows how long, and he decides something is wrong with the ball? And yet the officials, who handle the ball before and after each play, didn't notice anything?
And how come we never heard any testimony from the officials?
more whinny bullshit. It's called industrial espionage. If you're in competition with anybody in the same field with the same goal in mind, "it's what you do" . It happens everywhere, in business, in war, in love, in baseball, it happens between motorcycle clubs... we're all looking for some info to gain an advantage.Funny enough - I open ESPN.com today (gotta check on my fantasy team so I can make sure I kick some butt this week) and this story was on the front page.
http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/13533995/split-nfl-new-england-patriots-apart