ThrobDownSouth, genius, spellchecker and math savant, at it AGAIN...

I'm on Obama's half-breed team. They would hate me with all of Throb's enthusiasm too...




;) ;)

I didn't leave the Democrat Party. They LEFT me...

I was a black dude until LT figured out I was lying to him. I am a native American on all the school paper work I fill out.

My personal contribution to ethnic diversity.
 
The context:

No, I am not. I am looking at authors and methodology, one which they try to make purely mathematical thus we see why it is so terribly flawed. I think you misunderstand what is going on with the stimulus and the reports. There are several schools of economics and some tend to be input/output based. Here are the numbers, if I put in the numbers, then I will get these outputs. This is the bias of this report you so much like and the reason why it fails, as did the stimulus, to report accurately what has transpired economically. They did not go out and count beans, they used math, modeling and estimations. Now these things tend to work quite nicely when an economy is humming along smoothly, but their Diffy-Q methods (much the same as it is in Glowball Warning) fall apart in times of crises because they ignore so many of the small complex factors that go into a feedback loop (chaotic system) of an economy, the translation here being that they treat a chaotic problem with linear methods and they ignore the greatest single strange attractor all together, Human Action (Ludwig Elder von Mises)...

This is why Bernake throws his hands up. His math and his calculations say, this should be working, but it cannot, for it cannot measure in any possible way, the psychology of the traders, who are now living in a world of fear, uncertainty, and complexity of process in the sphere of the business world, which is why I implored you to look into Praxeology, and spend some time reading von Mises (if you want him in a nutshell, try "The Last Knight of Liberalism" by Hülsmann, downloadable at Mises.org).

You have embraced one school of economics for momentary benefit in an argument you rather wish to win (one which you declared yourself done with, what? three times now), for whatever reason I cannot fathom, for the reality of the news and the world bear unquestionable testimony as to the incorrectness of many of its basic assumptions such as the nebulous multipliers of government spending, which an Austrian would say should be not 1.57, but more like 0.57 for as posited by so many and which I referenced in Bastiat's parable, government spending retards in unseen ways by taking money that would have been spent by willing bettors and spending it in ways that have no detriment to government what-so-ever, for it can always inflate and tax its way out of bad bets.

I embraced a school of economics some time past, and will continue to look through its lens and will cite those who also share the same lens, because like von Mises, I came to my conclusions starting on the Left, with the Socialists of the Chair (although I would not have known the term at the time and would have bristled at the idea of actually being a Socialist instead of just thinking I could manage Capitalism "smarter") and began learning the arguments of my opposition (you remember G. H. W. B.'s "vodoo' economics) in order to destroy the arguments of the radical brain-dead rich guys and discovered that in all actuality, it was my positions that I could not defend, e.g., that demand makes and economy, that taxes have no impact because the rich can afford them, that businesses pay taxes, and so on and so forth.

This is why I knew the stimulus, and again, patiently, to point out my consistency, I said the same thing about G. W. B.'s stimulus, was actually a putative thing to a struggling economy and every temporary gain that you expect, and that does actually transpire for money is a wonderful veneer, with an economy as with people, but it eats away at the heart in so many unseen negative ways, that in the long run, the economy is hardly benefited, but rather harmed by having dollars raided from the pool of investment capital that would have been better utilized by studiers and gamblers than by politicians whose primary focus is on politics.

As to your next set of remarks, as pointed out in the rebuttals, it was done by Keynesian, therefore a proponent of government interventions in the market, a Middle-Way type at best, a Statist at worst and they clearly did not perform the study to show what happened, but how the jobs were created, and that, after-all was their intended purpose, for what ever reason, to sell you a laminated lemon. That which the veneer created was obviously destroyed and we can see that through the number of excuses being offered by the proponents of Interventionalism.

__________________
You loot the private sector, strip every dollar of 40¢ for overhead, and then give the other 60¢ to your political base in order to revitalize the looted.

What's not to like about that plan?


The Wealth of a Nation works best trickle-down. A Republic and an Economy work best trickle-up. A Socialist believes just the opposite.
A_J, the Stupid

(An Economy is the set of all transactions. Government is mutual cooperation for successful transacting. Wealth is the outcome of successful transactions.)

The response: http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=767582
 
I always spelled it "choad".



Can horny choads show you which way to go, too?
 
They can certainly advise you not to go near ThrobDownSouth.

You're either with him or fair game...

__________________
Contemporary leftists, on the other hand, view their opponents as people you send off to the Gulag, unworthy of any respect, deserving of any kind of low blow, no matter how foul. So you accuse Goldwater of insanity, slander Justice Thomas as a sexual monster, casually publish plays, books, and films calling for the assassination of President Bush, and assault the first serious Republican female candidate at her weakest point -- her family. And of course, you scream to high heaven if any form of turnabout occurs in your direction, as in the case of the Obama family, which was declared "off limits" early in the presidential campaign, at the same time that Palin's family was being stretched on the media rack.

This style of political loathing has become effectively innate. It has been systemized to such a degree as to become integral. Modern liberalism cannot do without it. An entire structure has been erected on the basis of political hatred, and from that structure a whole new strategy has arisen.

J.R. Dunn
 
He is quite the swine isn't he?

Yes...

__________________
“I always use the word extreme. That is what the caucus instructed me to use this week.”
Senator Chuck Schumer

“I used to think the left wing was the home of tolerance, open-mindedness, respect for all viewpoints…
But, now I’ve learned the truth the hard way.

Juan Williams
 
I spoke too soon; it seems Throb still believes in white niggers...


That [sic] Vetteman's proposed "Operation Sand Nigger" legislation in a nutshell, keepin' the US armed forces a Christian force, as the founding fathers envisioned. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Is there anyone who doesn't think Throb is a repugnant, vile piece of shit? Even he knows it.
 
Is there anyone who doesn't think Throb is a repugnant, vile piece of shit? Even he knows it.

Relishes it even!

He went on a real binge yesterday with at least half-a-dozen more comments similar to the one I chose.

I guess that was his liberal fireworks display...
 
Relishes it even!

He went on a real binge yesterday with at least half-a-dozen more comments similar to the one I chose.

I guess that was his liberal fireworks display...

Drawing negative attention to himself and encouraging personal abuse may be Rob's way of validating his self-hatred.

That's some fucked up shit.

Just think - if everyone treated him with kindness and respect his head would probably explode. Hmmmm.
 
Interesting characters in this thread:

A_J (entrepreneur, black belt, adopter of children)
Miles (cheats on his wife with chicks from Lit chat while she pays the bills)
Vette (too many bullshit things to list)

And you are all calling Rob a liar?
 
Hey Cap'n, if you asked Princess Rentagook how much $1.00 times 1.3 equals, what would she reply?
 
Back
Top