Those IMPLAUSIBLE & IMPOSSIBLE cellphone calls

Pookie said:
Where in the article does it say Marion Britton's call was 13 minutes? I see where Todd Beamer's was 13 minutes, but that was on an airfone.

The only thing I've found for Marion Britton's cell phone call is that it was almost 4 minutes. http://911debunker.livejournal.com/ ...


1) show me evidence of Todd Beamer's call being on an airfone. every other report that I have read has said specifically that he was using a cellphone. I have read this multiple times. Can you show phone records of this call being an airfone call. Can you also show where Lisa Jefferson met and knew Todd Beamer and would be able to RECOGNISE HIS VOICE so as to actually identifiy him? As far as I know, they NEVER MET and she wouldn't have known Todd Beamer from a bar of soap, so what evidence is there thatit really wasTodd Beamer and not some bullshit liar pretending to be him, like so many of the other calls so obviously are are just actors and fake.

2) provide a scientific study that shows that it's possible to make a successful call with a constant connection upto 4 minutes long or more, from a passenger jet flying six miles up at over 450mph, without an onboard cellular basestation - technology which DIDN'T EXIST until 2004. Without this, it can be assumed that NONE of the calls were real, especially considering that NO PHONE RECORDS CAN BE PROVIDED.

By the way, I wouldn't place much credibility on that 911debunker site - they've been caught in outright lies and distortions before. Perhaps you could cite instead, a relevant news report from the NEWS SITES that reported Marion Britton's cell phone call. Please provide the same for Todd Beamer's call.
 
Last edited:
Pookie said:
She's a scam artis...

I notice that you are liar. You have been repeatedly caught out as such.

You again avoided backing your bullshit when you were caught out....
Lovelynice said:
Pookie said:
The McCormick Center in Chicago and the Sight and Sound Theater in Pennsylvania are examples of steel structures collapsing...

LOSE AGAIN, IT WAS NOT A TOWER BUILDING -- it was a low-rise building and nothing like a steel-framed hi-rise tower.

try again, dear.


Pookie said:
http://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/TR-068.pdf

The Kader Toy Factory also collapsed due to fires...

LOSE AGAIN, IT WAS NOT A TOWER BUILDING -- it was a low-rise 4-storey building and nothing like a steel-framed hi-rise tower..


Pookie's bullshit just dropped dead like a stone. :rolleyes:

You're not exactly the brainiest of the bunch are you, dear.....

and yet again, you idiots failed to answer the following

Lovelynice said:
WTC 7 wasn't hit by any plane.

and it's collapse was EXACTLY like any other controlled demolition. Explain that.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif


and WTC 1 & 2 both went STRAIGHT-DOWN just like controlled demolitions do.

3 steel-framed buildings doing on ONE DAY doing what can only be done with, and has only been done, with CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS.

Your excuse fails.


Do try again, dear. It isn't difficult to use your brain.

No plane hit this building - it's a typical controlled demolition
http://xs513.xs.to/xs513/07104/building-implosion-11.gif

So is this...
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/images/wtc7/oslo_demo_clips.jpg

and neither did a plane hit this building...and it's an obvious controlled demolition too...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/hsw_implosion.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/wtc7_collapse_lg.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/wtc7_cbs_lowman.gif


Just like this is a controlled demolition...
http://xs513.xs.to/xs513/07104/building-implosion-9.gif

and despite your bullshit excuses, this one is an obvious controlled demolition too...
http://xs513.xs.to/xs513/07104/image023.jpg

and NONE OF YOU moronic lying government trolls has ever been able to cite anything to back your 9/11 "Arabs did it with boxcutters" silliness with an answer to this;

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

For MONTHS, AND MONTHS, AND MONTHS you shills have never been able to answer this. Instead, like Pookie the nutter has done, the government trolls have tried to pass of LOW-RISE buildings as if they were hi-rises, tried to pass off CONCRETE buildings as if they were steel-framed (KRcummings did that), and one of the total losers even tried to pass off a 4-storey WOODEN-FRAMED BRICK TOWN-HOUSE as if it were a steel-framed tower building.
 
Last edited:
KRCummings said:
I tried to explain how buildings work once. Didn't do a damn bit of good.

That's because you're the fuckwit who tried to claim that hi-rise buildings with steel frames ALWAYS fell STRAIGHT-DOWN THROUGH THEIR OWN STRUCTURE....
but you have NEVER been able to cite a SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE to show this

You know absolutely fuck-all about buildings.

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.


when are you going to back your BULLSHIT, KR-the-liar?
 
Pookie said:
How many copies of "Loose Change" ...


I've never seen "Loose Change"

It's not available in Japan as far I know. I've mentioned this many times already, so surely if you don't know that by now, isn't it about time that you started using that single braincell of yours to pay attention to reality?

Even so, when Acanthus began citing from a poorly researched troll site in an effort to debunk the claims in the film, it was extremely easy to catch him out with every one of his excuses as being crap. He ran away. I kept copies of the debate, do you want to see them? :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:
 
Last edited:
Pookie said:
*

Hey, LN. I was just wondering if you got anymore "Zogby" polls to post, LN? Heh. :)
What's wrong, dear?

Still sore because I pointed out that the Zogby poll didn't show that only 1% of Americans disbelieved the USA government's lies about 9/11. One of you fools tried to make such a claim that only 1% of Americans disbelieved the USA government's lies about 9/11 ....and I showed their bullshit to be a made up pile of nonsense.

Afterall what I said was true. It certainly wasn't only 1% - I was right, you liars were wrong, and your silly attempt to misrepresent my answer ended up blowing up in your own face :rolleyes:

Of course, we all know that now the 9/11 sceptics - those who don't believe USA government's lies about 9/11 - are now far into the majority. There are numerous polls showing this. You fools who defend the USA government's lies about 9/11 are in the increasingly small and useless minority. :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:
 
Last edited:
Lavared said:
Polls don't prove scientific fact; they only show opinions...

I never stated otherwise.

What's wrong dear? Not only have you LOST the debate repeatedly because SCIENTIFIC FACTS don't support you....but you also LOSE in the polls, because these days, the VAST MAJORITY DON'T BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT'S LIES.

9/11 was an Inside Job - and despite all the propaganda from shills like you and the USA government, the majority of the world knows it.
 
Lovelynice said:
all she managed to do was show off what an idiot she is.

No, she points out evidence, all you do is repeat the same discredited info. I almost pity you.
 
Lovelynice said:
I never stated otherwise.

What's wrong dear? Not only have you LOST the debate repeatedly because SCIENTIFIC FACTS don't support you....but you also LOSE in the polls, because these days, the VAST MAJORITY DON'T BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT'S LIES.

9/11 was an Inside Job - and despite all the propaganda from shills like you and the USA government, the majority of the world knows it.
Despite the vast majority supposedly believing in the Magic Covert Explosive Planters And Remote-Controlled Jets theory, no credible testimony has surfaced from either witnesses or collaborators. And no action has been taken against any alleged perpetrators.

And you're still misspelling "occasion".
 
phrodeau said:
Despite the vast majority ...

Well oddly enough, they are OBVIOUSLY CORRECT and YOU ARE NOT...because on EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

So far, despite ALL OF YOUR STUPID LIES and even more stupid defense of the USA government's silly bullshit story, none of you nutcases have been able to do so.

:nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:
 
Last edited:
catfish said:
No, she points out evidence...

Really???

Funny how on EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

When asked to provide some evidence showing otherwise, Pookie FAILED UTTERLY TO DO SO but cited 2 low-rise buildings instead.

When asked to provide a scientific study that shows that it's possible to make a successful cellphone call from a passenger jet flying six miles up at over 450mph, without an onboard cellular basestation - technology which DIDN'T EXIST until 2004.

Yet again, Pookie FAILED UTTERLY TO DO SO

What a total loser she is, just like you :rolleyes:

Try again, dear...this time with feeling.
 
Last edited:
Lovelynice said:
Funny how on EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Do you have any evidence that any collapsed outside of their footprint for ANY reason in the whole history of STEEL-FRAMED towers?

I mean, as far as engineering goes, it's not likely to happen, otherwise, we'd still be building pyramids.
 
In the whole history of Islam, how many times did they try to blow up the Twin Towers?

Was it more or less than the number of times Monica blew Bill while Osama was telling him, "We're going to defeat you so we can kill all the Jews in the Middle East?"
 
phrodeau said:
Despite the vast majority supposedly believing in the Magic Covert Explosive Planters And Remote-Controlled Jets theory, no credible testimony has surfaced from either witnesses or collaborators. And no action has been taken against any alleged perpetrators.

And you're still misspelling "occasion".


Where were you when Hillary exposed the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy...
 
Lovelynice said:
1) show me evidence of Todd Beamer's call being on an airfone. every other report that I have read has said specifically that he was using a cellphone. I have read this multiple times. Can you show phone records of this call being an airfone call.

I debunked this lie of yours months ago. Are my recent spankings of your credibility causing you to forget? Here's a friendly reminder then ...


Pookie said:
But Todd Beamer didn't call from a cellphone. He called from an airphone. How do we know this? Because he talked to Lisa Jefferson, a Verizon Airfone operator.

Can't you conspiracy nutjobs get anything right, LN?

Consider yourself debunked ... again. :)

Lovelynice said:
Link? Source? Quoted article???

ANYTHING TO BACK YOUR BULLSHIT????

To which I replied ...

Pookie said:
Are you going to claim Lisa Jefferson wasn't an Airfone operator? I would think someone so well versed in "the truth" could at least get something right.

From a few of the numerous articles on the web ...

The Verizon Airfone operator was the last person to talk to United Flight 93 passenger Todd Beamer before he and other passengers rushed the cockpit to try to take the plane back from hijackers. She listened as he talked about his family, his fears and his faith, and she prayed the Lord's Prayer and the 23rd Psalm with him.
http://www.post-gazette.com/nation/20020911jefferson0911P6.asp

Verizon Airfone Supervisor Lisa Jefferson Recognized for Her Outstanding Performance and Humanitarian Spirit
http://newscenter.verizon.com/press-releases/verizon/2002/page.jsp?itemID=29721512

I mean, he talked to a Verizon Airfone operator. The Verizon Airfone operator was recognized for her outstanding performance. I just can't imagine where I got the silly impression that she was an airfone operator. I mean, every other article you've read says he was using a cellphone, and we know you've done lots and lots of in depth research into this whole 911 thingie. *nods*

*ponders*

:)


Again, LN. Why such a need to make up things when you supposedly have truth on your side? *shakes head in disgust*
 
Because that's what the Left does on every issue, because you won't be here every morning with reason...

Even the one you champion.



:devil:
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Because that's what the Left does on every issue, because you won't be here every morning with reason...

Even the one you champion.



:devil:


Stop picking on me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fucker


:rose:


:D


Dammit, it's catching! :eek:
 
Lovelynice said:
2) provide a scientific study that shows that it's possible to make a successful call with a constant connection upto 4 minutes long or more, from a passenger jet flying six miles up at over 450mph, without an onboard cellular basestation - technology which DIDN'T EXIST until 2004. Without this, it can be assumed that NONE of the calls were real, especially considering that NO PHONE RECORDS CAN BE PROVIDED.

Ahhh, the goal posts move again. When I burn up one strawman, you build another. Again, your Prof Dewdney said it was possible. Are you going to call your own source a liar?

It's fun watching the conspiracy nutters turn on each other to save their own hides. It's why Prof Jones isn't a "Scholar For Truth" anymore. The same is happening with the "PentaCON" video makers now. LOL

Poor, poor Prof Dewdney. LN doesn't wuv him anymore. He's no longer a twoofer. *sad look*

Lovelynice said:
By the way, I wouldn't place much credibility on that 911debunker site - they've been caught in outright lies and distortions before. Perhaps you could cite instead, a relevant news report from the NEWS SITES that reported Marion Britton's cell phone call. Please provide the same for Todd Beamer's call.

Feel free to point out something "credible" that contradicts that then. I mean, a recording of her call was used in the Moussaoui trial. There should be something out there to credibly debunk me with. LOL

Actually, 911debunker seems to be using data from "Killtown" in the very same post. Heh. But I almost forgot. "Killtown" is another of your own that the nutters are turning on now too. LOL

But then, you've used this "13 minutes" misquote for Marion Britton all over the frickin' intrawebs. And when I say "all over", I do mean "ALL OVER". It's amazing how much I run into your posts while googling now and then. You C&P this same ... uhhh ... stuff ... all over the frickin' place ... over and over and over and over .... LOL



You so funny, LN. *pinches your cheek*


Oh, and do I really need to repost my "Verizon airfone" post again? I will, if you insist. Heh.

:) <----- *Makes note to cut back on the freakin' smilies*
 
Lovelynice said:
I notice that you are liar. You have been repeatedly caught out as such.

You again avoided backing your bullshit when you were caught out....

LOL

Too funny. :)
 
The world is ending in nine days, so it's probably about time for you all to start thinking in terms of wrapping this thing up.
 
Byron In Exile said:
The world is ending in nine days, so it's probably about time for you all to start thinking in terms of wrapping this thing up.

Fucking deadlines. The world is going to end because of them. Just you wait and see.
 
Pookie said:
Ahhh, the goal posts move again...

when? Sounds like you just have a major problem backing your stupid excuses, so all you do is make up more stupid excuses.
 
Pookie said:
I debunked this ...

No, all you did was claim that you did.

Si I repeat the problem that you have;

1) show me evidence of Todd Beamer's call being on an airfone. every other report that I have read has said specifically that he was using a cellphone. I have read this multiple times. Let's repeat this little problem of yours with more clarity since apparently you don't get it - Can you show phone records of this call being an airfone call?

Surely if somebody called Verizon there would be a record of that call??? Yet there isn't. Not a thing. Nothing to show that the call came from the aircraft it is claimed to have come from, nothing to show that the call even occurred at all.

Also - show when and HOW Lisa Jefferson got to personally know, and could therefore identify Todd Beamer's voice from anyone else. She never knew him. You can not therefore show that it was Todd Beamer.

You showed no links. Not a one, from any news site.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top